Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 1843–1851 | Cite as

Opioid Prescribing After Curative-Intent Surgery: A Qualitative Study Using the Theoretical Domains Framework

  • Jay S. Lee
  • Vartika Parashar
  • Jacquelyn B. Miller
  • Samantha M. Bremmer
  • Joceline V. Vu
  • Jennifer F. Waljee
  • Lesly A. Dossett
Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Abstract

Background

Excessive opioid prescribing is common after curative-intent surgery, but little is known about what factors influence prescribing behaviors among surgeons. To identify targets for intervention, we performed a qualitative study of opioid prescribing after curative-intent surgery using the Theoretical Domains Framework, a well-established implementation science method for identifying factors influencing healthcare provider behavior.

Methods

Prior to data collection, we constructed a semi-structured interview guide to explore decision making for opioid prescribing. We then conducted interviews with surgical oncology providers at a single comprehensive cancer center. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, then independently coded by two investigators using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify theoretical domains relevant to opioid prescribing. Relevant domains were then linked to behavior models to select targeted interventions likely to improve opioid prescribing.

Results

Twenty-one subjects were interviewed from November 2016 to May 2017, including attending surgeons, resident surgeons, physician assistants, and nurses. Five theoretical domains emerged as relevant to opioid prescribing: environmental context and resources; social influences; beliefs about consequences; social/professional role and identity; and goals. Using these domains, three interventions were identified as likely to change opioid prescribing behavior: (1) enablement (deploy nurses during preoperative visits to counsel patients on opioid use); (2) environmental restructuring (provide on-screen prompts with normative data on the quantity of opioid prescribed); and (3) education (provide prescribing guidelines).

Conclusions

Key determinants of opioid prescribing behavior after curative-intent surgery include environmental and social factors. Interventions targeting these factors are likely to improve opioid prescribing in surgical oncology.

Notes

Funding

Dr. Lee is a National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellow supported by the National Cancer Institute (5T32 CA009672-23), and Dr. Waljee receives funding from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1 DA042859), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1K08 HS023313-01). The contents of this study are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.

References

  1. 1.
    Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2010–2015. MMWR. 2016;65(5051):1445–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levy B, Paulozzi L, Mack KA, Jones CM. Trends in opioid analgesic-prescribing rates by specialty, U.S., 2007–2012. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(3):409–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):e170504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee JS, Hu HM, Edelman AL, et al. New persistent opioid use among patients with cancer after curative-intent surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4042–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jung BF, Herrmann D, Griggs J, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH. Neuropathic pain associated with non-surgical treatment of breast cancer. Pain. 2005;118(1–2):10–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Land SR, Kopec JA, Cecchini RS, et al. Neurotoxicity from oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2205–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mols F, Beijers T, Lemmens V, van den Hurk CJ, Vreugdenhil G, van de Poll-Franse LV. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and its association with quality of life among 2–11 year colorectal cancer survivors: results from the population-based PROFILES registry. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(21):2699–707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Portenoy RK. Treatment of cancer pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2236–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swarm RA, Abernethy AP, Anghelescu DL, et al. Adult cancer pain. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(8):992–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fann JR, Ell K, Sharpe M. Integrating psychosocial care into cancer services. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1178–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10(1):19–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brummett CM, Janda AM, Schueller CM, et al. Survey criteria for fibromyalgia independently predict increased postoperative opioid consumption after lower-extremity joint arthroplasty: a prospective, observational cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(6):1434–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Janda AM, As-Sanie S, Rajala B, et al. Fibromyalgia survey criteria are associated with increased postoperative opioid consumption in women undergoing hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):1103–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dreyer T, Rontal R, Gabriel K, Udow-Phillips M. Uncoordinated Prescription Opioid Use in Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Healthcare Research and Transformation; Dec 2015. http://www.chrt.org/publication/uncoordinated-prescription-opioid-use-in-michigan/. Accessed 20 Feb 2017.
  15. 15.
    Hill MV, McMahon ML, Stucke RS, Barth RJ Jr. Wide variation and excessive dosage of opioid prescriptions for common general surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2017;265(4):709–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Islam R, Tinmouth AT, Francis JJ, et al. A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians’ beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duncan EM, Francis JJ, Johnston M, et al. Learning curves, taking instructions, and patient safety: using a theoretical domains framework in an interview study to investigate prescribing errors among trainee doctors. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McSherry LA, Dombrowski SU, Francis JJ, et al. ‘It’s a can of worms’: understanding primary care practitioners’ behaviours in relation to HPV using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Michie S, Pilling S, Garety P, et al. Difficulties implementing a mental health guideline: an exploratory investigation using psychological theory. Implement Sci. 2007;2:8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patey AM, Islam R, Francis JJ, Bryson GL, Grimshaw JM. Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biezen R, Brijnath B, Grando D, Mazza D. Management of respiratory tract infections in young children: a qualitative study of primary care providers’ perspectives. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017;27:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walker AE, Grimshaw J, Johnston M, Pitts N, Steen N, Eccles M. PRIME—PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research: selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2003;3(1):22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Soneji N, Clarke HA, Ko DT, Wijeysundera DN. Risks of developing persistent opioid use after major surgery. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1083–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clarke H, Soneji N, Ko DT, Yun L, Wijeysundera DN. Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g1251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alam A, Gomes T, Zheng H, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Bell CM. Long-term analgesic use after low-risk surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):425–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee JS, Hu HM, Brummett CM, et al. Postoperative opioid prescribing and the pain scores on hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey. JAMA. 2017;317(19):2013–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bartels K, Mayes LM, Dingmann C, Bullard KJ, Hopfer CJ, Binswanger IA. Opioid use and storage patterns by patients after hospital discharge following surgery. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147972.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bates C, Laciak R, Southwick A, Bishoff J. Overprescription of postoperative narcotics: a look at postoperative pain medication delivery, consumption and disposal in urological practice. J Urol. 2011;185(2):551–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bicket MC, Long JJ, Pronovost PJ, Alexander GC, Wu CL. Prescription opioid analgesics commonly unused after surgery: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(11):1066–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harris K, Curtis J, Larsen B, et al. Opioid pain medication use after dermatologic surgery a prospective observational study of 212 dermatologic surgery patients. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(3):317–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maughan BC, Hersh EV, Shofer FS, et al. Unused opioid analgesics and drug disposal following outpatient dental surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;168(1879-0046):328–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rodgers J, Cunningham K, Fitzgerald K, Finnerty E. Opioid consumption following outpatient upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(4):645–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steinmo SH, Michie S, Fuller C, Stanley S, Stapleton C, Stone SP. Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement “Sepsis Six”. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hill MV, Stucke RS, McMahon ML, Beeman JL, Barth RJ Jr. An Educational Intervention Decreases Opioid Prescribing After General Surgical Operations. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(3):468.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Howard RA, Waljee JF, Brummett CM, Englesbe MJ, Lee JS. Reduction in opioid prescribing through implementation of evidence-based prescribing guidelines. JAMA Surg. 2017.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arabi YM, Al-Dorzi HM, Alamry A, et al. The impact of a multifaceted intervention including sepsis electronic alert system and sepsis response team on the outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock. Ann Intensiv Care. 2017;7(1):57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Steinmo S, Fuller C, Stone SP, Michie S. Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the ‘Sepsis Six’ clinical care bundle. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chiu AS, Healy JM, DeWane MP, Longo WE, Yoo PS. Trainees as agents of change in the opioid epidemic: optimizing the opioid prescription practices of surgical residents. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(1):65–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay S. Lee
    • 1
  • Vartika Parashar
    • 1
  • Jacquelyn B. Miller
    • 2
  • Samantha M. Bremmer
    • 1
  • Joceline V. Vu
    • 1
  • Jennifer F. Waljee
    • 3
  • Lesly A. Dossett
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer CenterAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Division of Surgical OncologyUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer CenterAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations