Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 837–843 | Cite as

Perioperative Risk Calculator Predicts Long-Term Oncologic Outcome for Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma

  • Masashi Takeuchi
  • Hiroya Takeuchi
  • Hirofumi Kawakubo
  • Eisuke Booka
  • Shuhei Mayanagi
  • Kazumasa Fukuda
  • Rieko Nakamura
  • Koichi Suda
  • Norihito Wada
  • Yuko Kitagawa
Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Background

Few risk models have been provided to predict long-term prognosis after esophagectomy. This study investigated the reliability of a risk calculator as well as classification and regression trees analysis for predicting long-term prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Methods

The study enrolled 438 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between July 2000 and June 2016. Patients who underwent R0 or R1 resection or esophagectomy with combined resection of other organs were included. The authors investigated the usefulness of a risk model for 30-day mortality and operative mortality described in their previous report for predicting long-term prognosis after esophagectomy.

Results

The 438 patients (377 men and 61 women) in this study had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 62.8% and a disease-free survival rate of 54.3%. The OS was higher for the patients with 30-day mortality risk model values lower than 0.675% than for those with values higher than 0.675% (p < 0.001). The cutoff values for prediction were shown to be significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis. The risk calculator was validated by comparing the cutoff values with Harrell’s C-index values of clinical stage. For overall risk, the C-index of operative mortality was 0.697, and the C-index of cStage was 0.671.

Conclusions

The risk calculator was useful for predicting recurrence and death after esophagectomy. Furthermore, because the C-index of the risk model for operative mortality was higher than for clinical tumor-node-metastasis stage, this risk-scoring system may be more useful clinically.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Kumiko Motooka, who belongs to the staff at the Department of Surgery in Keio University School of Medicine, for her help in the preparation of this report.

Disclosure

There are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10434_2017_6311_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kidane B, Sulman J, Xu W, et al. Baseline measure of health-related quality of life (functional assessment of cancer therapy-esophagus) is associated with overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:1571–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Ability of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1132–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takeuchi H, Saikawa Y, Oyama T, et al. Factors influencing the long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg. 2010;34:277–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Booka E, Takeuchi H, Nishi T, et al. The impact of postoperative complications on survivals after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Med Baltim. 2015;94:e1369.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Cumulative prognostic scores based on plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels in esophageal cancer patients treated with transthoracic esophagectomy: comparison with the Glasgow prognostic score. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:302–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M WC, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed Wiley-Liss, New York, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Clinical outcome of transthoracic esophagectomy with thoracic duct resection: number of dissected lymph node and distribution of lymph node metastasis around the thoracic duct. Med Baltim. 2016;95:e3839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:410–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takesue T, Takeuchi H, Ogura M, et al. A prospective randomized trial of enteral nutrition after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:802–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breiman L, Friedman JH, Stone CJ, et al. Classification and regression trees. 1984;1:368.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garzotto M, Beer TM, Hudson RG, et al. Improved detection of prostate cancer using classification and regression tree analysis. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4322–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loh W-Y. Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. 2011;1:14–23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okamura A, Takeuchi H, Matsuda S, et al. Factors affecting cytokine change after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3130–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogura M, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Clinical significance of CXCL-8/CXCR-2 network in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery. 2013;154:512–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. Potential prophylactic measures against postoperative immunosuppression: could they reduce recurrence rates in oncological patients? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:972–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hogan BV, Peter MB, Shenoy HG, et al. Surgery-induced immunosuppression. Surgeon. 2011;9:38–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldfarb Y, Sorski L, Benish M, et al. Improving postoperative immune status and resistance to cancer metastasis. Ann Surg. 2011;253:798–810.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abramovitch R, Marikovsky M, Meir G, et al. Stimulation of tumour growth by wound-derived growth factors. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1392–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferri LE, Law S, Wong KH, et al. The influence of technical complications on postoperative outcome and survival after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:557–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng JF, Huang Y, Lu WS CQ. Preoperative platelet count in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: is it a prognostic factor? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398:1115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shimada H, Oohira G, Okazumi S, et al. Thrombocytosis associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:737–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tsuruo T, Fujita N. Platelet aggregation in the formation of tumor metastasis. Proc Japan Acad Ser B, Phys Biol Scienes. 2008;84:189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reeh M, Metze J, Uzunoglu FG, et al. The PER (Preoperative Esophagectomy Risk) Score: a simple risk score to predict short-term and long-term outcome in patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer. Medicine Baltimore. 2016;95:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masashi Takeuchi
    • 1
  • Hiroya Takeuchi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hirofumi Kawakubo
    • 1
  • Eisuke Booka
    • 1
  • Shuhei Mayanagi
    • 1
  • Kazumasa Fukuda
    • 1
  • Rieko Nakamura
    • 1
  • Koichi Suda
    • 1
  • Norihito Wada
    • 1
  • Yuko Kitagawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHamamatsu University School of MedicineShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations