Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 818–828 | Cite as

Comparative Effectiveness of Preoperative Paravertebral Block for Post-Mastectomy Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Anaeze C. OffodileII
  • Mario A. Aycart
  • Jodi B. Segal
Reconstructive Oncology
  • 185 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Paravertebral block (PVB) has emerged as a viable strategy for improving postoperative outcomes in breast surgery; however, it is unclear whether these benefits extend to recipients of post-mastectomy reconstruction (PMR).

Methods

A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library electronic databases was conducted for all studies matching the a priori inclusion criteria (inception to 1 March 2017). Independent assessment by two reviewers, in stages, of the title/abstract and full text was performed. Data relating to study design, patient characteristics, PVB medications and technique, and outcomes, including pain, opioid consumption, length of stay (LOS), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and PVB-related complications was abstracted.

Results

Of the 1243 identified articles, nine met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 936 patients (PVB, n = 518; non-PVB, n = 418) in two randomized controlled trials (RCT) and seven retrospective cohort studies. Of these studies, six described PVB for prosthetic PMR, and three described PVB for autologous PMR. Overall, there is a subtle trend towards improved pain control, less opioid requirement and shorter LOS, while PONV was largely unchanged in patients receiving PVB for PMR. In two studies, technical failure was reported at 7.4 and 10%, although no study reported a PVB-related complication. Study quality varied, and risk of bias in the included studies was high. Heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Although recent reports and RCTs advocate for PVB use in PMR, our review highlights significant heterogeneity and knowledge gaps that must be addressed in order for PVB to become part of the optimal anesthetic protocol in PMR.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Charalampos Siotos for his technical assistance in preparing this article.

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Terkawi AS, Tsang S, Sessler DI, et al. Improving Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Mixed-Effects Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E757–80.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010;105:842–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desai S, Jena AB. Do celebrity endorsements matter? Observational study of BRCA gene testing and mastectomy rates after Angelina Jolie’s New York Times editorial. BMJ. 2016;355:i6357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donovan CA, Bao J, Gangi A, et al. Bilateral Mastectomy as Overtreatment for Breast Cancer in Women Age Forty Years and Younger with Unilateral Operable Invasive Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2017. 24(8):2168–2173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy R, Wahhab S, Rovito P, et al. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;2003:333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roughton MC, DiEgidio P, Zhou L, Stitzenberg K, Meyer AM. Distance to a Plastic Surgeon and Type of Insurance Plan Are Independently Predictive of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;138:203e–11e.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2000;106:1014–25; discussion 26-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ journal of surgery. 2005;75:940–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2013;131:15–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaffe SM, Campbell P, Bellman M, Baildam A. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in women following breast surgery: an audit. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2000;17:261–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolf O, Clemens MW, Purugganan RV, et al. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Paravertebral Block versus General Anesthesia Alone for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;137:660e–6e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell M, Tan M, et al. Concensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017;139:1056e–71e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parikh RP, Sharma K, Guffey R, Myckatyn TM. Preoperative Paravertebral Block Improves Postoperative Pain Control and Reduces Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2016;23:4262–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heesen M, Klimek M, Rossaint R, Imberger G, Straube S. Paravertebral block and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:1471–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62:e134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silverman SR, Schertz LA, Yuen HK, Lowman JD, Bickel CS. Systematic review of the methodological quality and outcome measures utilized in exercise interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:718–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buggy DJ, Kerin MJ. Paravertebral analgesia with levobupivacaine increases postoperative flap tissue oxygen tension after immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction compared with intravenous opioid analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:375–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coopey SB, Specht MC, Warren L, Smith BL, Winograd JM, Fleischmann K. Use of preoperative paravertebral block decreases length of stay in patients undergoing mastectomy plus immediate reconstruction. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2013;20:1282–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abdelsattar J, Boughey J, Aodhnait F, et al. Comparative Study of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Paravertebral Block for Pain Control Following Mastectomy with Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2016;23:465-70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glissmeyer C, Johnson W, Sherman B, Glissmeyer M, Garreau J, Johnson N. Effect of paravertebral nerve blocks on narcotic use after mastectomy with reconstruction. Am J Surg 2015;209:881-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aufforth R, Jain J, Morreale J, Baumgarten R, Falk J, Wesen C. Paravertebral blocks in breast cancer surgery: is there a difference in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting? Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2012;19:548-52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Unkart JT, Padwal JA, Ilfeld BM, Wallace AM. Treatment of Post-Latissimus Dorsi Flap Breast Reconstruction Pain With Continuous Paravertebral Nerve Blocks: A Retrospective Review. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2016;6(5):e39476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fahy AS, Jakub JW, Dy BM, et al. Paravertebral blocks in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction provides improved pain control and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2014;21:3284–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vila H, Liu J, Kavasmaneck D. Paravertebral block: new benefits from an old procedure. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:316–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naja Z, Lonnqvist P. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1184–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richardson J, Lonnqvist P. Thoracic paravertebral block. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:230–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tahiri Y, Tran DQ, Bouteaud J, et al. General anaesthesia versus thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery: a meta-analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2011;64:1261-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62:1013–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samargandi OA, Hasan H, Thoma A. Methodologic Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;137:225e–36e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taichman DB, Sahni P, Pinborg A, et al. Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials - A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2277-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ng TT, McGory ML, Ko CY, Maggard MA. Meta-analysis in surgery: methods and limitations. Archives of Surgery. 2006;141:1125-30; discussion 31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Egger M, Smith GD. Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise. BMJ. 1997;315:1371–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chiappelli F, Caldeira Brant X, Neagos N, Oluwadara O, Ramchandani M, eds. Evidence-Based Practice: Toward Optimizing Clinical Outcomes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anaeze C. OffodileII
    • 1
  • Mario A. Aycart
    • 2
  • Jodi B. Segal
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations