Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most mutilating procedures, with important postoperative morbidity, an altered body image, and long-term physical and psychosocial concerns. This study aimed to assess quality of life (QOL) during the first year after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy performed with curative intent.

Methods

A French multicentric prospective study was performed by including patients who underwent pelvic exenteration. Quality of life by measurement of functional and symptom scales was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires before surgery, at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.

Results

The study enrolled 97 patients. Quality of life including physical, personal, fatigue, and anorexia reported in the QLQ-C30 was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively and improved at least to baseline level 1 year after the procedure. Body image also was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively. Global health, emotional, dyspnea, and anorexia items were significantly improved 1 year after surgery compared with baseline values. Unlike younger patients, elderly patients did not regain physical and social activities after pelvic exenteration.

Conclusions

Therapeutic decision on performing a pelvic exenteration can have a severe and permanent impact on all aspects of patients’ QOL. Deterioration of QOL was most significant during the first 3 months after surgery. Elderly patients were the only group of patients with permanent decreased physical and social function. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up evaluation should include health-related QOL instruments, counseling by a multidisciplinary team to cover all aspects concerning stoma care, sexual function, and long-term concerns after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marnitz S, Köhler C, Müller M, Behrens K, Hasenbein K, Schneider A. Indications for primary and secondary exenterations in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:1023–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maggioni A, Roviglione G, Landoni F, et al. Pelvic exenteration: ten-year experience at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:64–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ungar L, Palafavi L, Novak Z. Primary pelvic exenteration in cervical cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:S9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Westin SN, Rallapalli V, Fellman B, Urbauer DL, Pal N, Frumovitz MM, et al. Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:546–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiva LM, Lapuente F, González-Cortijo L, González-Martín A, Rojo A, García JF, Carballo N. Surgical treatment of recurrent cervical cancer: state of the art and new achievements. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(3 Suppl 2):S60–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferron G, Gangloff D, Querleu D, Frigenza M, Torrent JJ, Picaud L, et al. Vaginal reconstruction with pedicled vertical deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) after pelvic exenteration: a consecutive case series. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jurado M, Bazán A, Alcázar JL, Garcia-Tutor E. Primary vaginal reconstruction at the time of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer: morbidity revisited. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harji DP, Griffiths B, Velikova G, Sagar PM, Brown J. Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1132–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rezk YA, Hurley KE, Carter J, Dao F, Bochner BH, Aubey JJ, et al. A prospective study of quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: interim results. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128:191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez A, Filleron T, Vitse L, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: is there any advantage? Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:374–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cull A, Howat S, Greimel E, et al. Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire module to assess the quality of life of ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials: a progress report. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:47–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greimel E, Bottomley A, Cull A, et al. An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-OV28) in assessing the quality of life of patients with ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Magrina JF. Types of pelvic exenterations: a reappraisal. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;37:363–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Höckel M. Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER): principles and practice. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:S13–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawighorst-Knapstein S, Fusshoeller C, Franz C, Trautmann K, et al. The impact of treatment for genital cancer on quality of life and body image: results of a prospective longitudinal 10-year study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:398–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roos EJ, de Graeff A, van Eijkeren MA, et al. Quality of life after pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:610–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vera MI. Quality of life following pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 1981;12:355–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Breetvelt IS, Van Dam FS. Underreporting by cancer patients: the case of response-shift. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:981–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Esnaola NF, Cantor SB, Johnson ML, et al. Pain and quality of life after treatment in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Young JM, Badgery-Parker T, Masya LM, King M, Koh C, Lynch AC, et al. Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:277–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Austin KK, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Quality of life of survivors after pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dale W, Hemmerich J, Kamm A, Posner MC, Matthews JB, Rothman R, et al. Geriatric assessment improves prediction of surgical outcomes in older adults undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2014;259:960–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dessole M, Petrillo M, Lucidi A, et al. Quality of life in women after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a multicentric study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016. https:doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dutta SC, Chang SC, Coffey CS, et al. Health-related quality of life assessment after radical cystectomy: comparison of ileal conduit with continent orthotopic neobladder. J Urol. 2002;168:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hart S, Skinner EC, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients with an ileal conduit, cutaneous or urethral kock pouch. J Urol. 1999;162:77–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Forner DM, Lampe B. Ileal conduit and continent ileocecal pouch for patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: comparison of complications and quality of life. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:403–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gerharz EW, Mansson A, Hunt S, et al. Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: an evidence-based analysis. J Urol. 2005;174:1729–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiva LM, Lapuente F, Nunez C, Ramirez PT. Ileal orthotopic neobladder after pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, et al. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987–2003). Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:261–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith HO, Genesen MC, Runowicz CD, et al. The rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: modifications, complications, and sexual function. Cancer. 1998;83:510–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ratliff CR, Gershenson DM, Morris M, et al. Sexual adjustment of patients undergoing gracilis myocutaneous flap vaginal reconstruction in conjunction with pelvic exenteration. Cancer. 1996;78:2229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Corney RH, Crowther ME, Everett H, Howells A, Shepherd JH. Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Andersen BL, Hacker NF. Psychosexual adjustment following pelvic exenteration. Obstet Gynecol. 1983:61:331–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, et al. Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res. 2007:138:79–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Watson PG. The effects of short-term postoperative counseling on cancer/ostomy patients. Cancer Nurs. 1983;6:21–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pomel C, Rouzier R, Pocard M, et al. Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer relapse. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:616–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Puntambekar S, Sharma V, Jamkar AV, Gadkari Y, Joshi G, Puntambekar S, et al. Our experience of laparoscopic anterior exenteration in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de la GJ, Wilson SS, Behbakht K. Total pelvic exenteration with a split-thickness skin graft neovagina, continent orthotopic neobladder, and rectal reanastomosis, resulting in no external ostomies and adequate sexual function. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:312–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Chantal Franco and Vincent Mauries for their valuable help in data management. This study was financially supported by the STIC (support for innovative and expensive techniques) from the Institute National du Cancer (INCA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Martinez PhD, MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez, A., Filleron, T., Rouanet, P. et al. Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 535–541 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6120-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6120-z

Keywords

Navigation