Skip to main content

Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis

An Erratum to this article was published on 16 August 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Bowel function in long-term rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis has not been characterized adequately. We hypothesized that bowel function is associated with patient, disease, and treatment characteristics.

Methods

The cohort study included Kaiser Permanente members who were long-term (≥5 years) rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis. Bowel function was scored using the self-administered, 14-item Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Index. Patient, cancer, and treatment variables were collected from the electronic medical chart. We used multiple regression to assess the relationship of patient- and treatment-related variables with the bowel function score.

Results

The study included 381 anastomosis patients surveyed an average 12 years after their rectal cancer surgeries. The total bowel function score averaged 53 (standard deviation, 9; range, 31–70, higher scores represent better function). Independent factors associated with worse total bowel function score included receipt of radiation therapy (yes vs. no: 5.3-unit decrement, p < 0.0001), tumor distance from the anal verge (≤6 cm vs. >6 cm: 3.2-unit decrement, p < 0.01), and history of a temporary ostomy (yes vs. no: 4.0-unit decrement, p < 0.01). One factor measured at time of survey was also associated with worse total bowel function score: ever smoking (2.3-unit decrement, p < 0.05). The regression model explained 20% of the variation in the total bowel function score.

Conclusions

Low tumor location, radiation therapy, temporary ostomy during initial treatment, and history of smoking were linked with decreased long-term bowel function following an anastomosis. These results should improve decision-making about surgical options.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Change history

  • 16 August 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

  1. American Cancer Society, Fact Sheet Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2011–2013, http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-028312.pdf. Accessed 29 Jun 2016.

  2. Altekruse S, Kosary C, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2007. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute (2010).

  3. Kosinski L, Habr-Gama A, Ludwig K, Perez R. Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management: a review of contemporary primary rectal cancer treatment strategies. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(3):173–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, et al. Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life: an international multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:994–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1377–87.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai X, Wong FK, Ching SS. Review of bowel dysfunction of rectal cancer patients during the first five years after sphincter-preserving surgery: a population in need of nursing attention. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:681–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen TY, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, et al. Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:106–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Desnoo L, Faithfull S. A qualitative study of anterior resection syndrome: the experiences of cancer survivors who have undergone resection surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006;15:244–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knowles, G, Haigh R, McLean C, et al. Long term effect of surgery and radiotherapy for colorectal cancer on defecatory function and quality of life, Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(5):570–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pucciarelli S, Del Bianco P, Efficace F, et al. Health-related quality of life, faecal continence and bowel function in rectal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:601–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells CI, Vather R, Chu MJ, Robertson JP, Bissett IP. Anterior resection syndrome—a risk factor analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:350–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrinton LJ, Altschuler A, McMullen CK, et al. Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016. Doi: 10.3322/caac.21345.

  14. Wendel CS, Grant M, Herrinton L, et al. Reliability and validity of a survey to measure bowel function and quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:2831–40.

  15. Sun V, Grant M, Wendel CS, et al. Dietary and behavioral adjustments to manage bowel dysfunction after surgery in long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4317–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincterpreserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1353–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, et al. Revision and psychometric testing of the City of Hope Quality of Life—Ostomy Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1445–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. SF-12v2™: How to score version 2 of the SF-12® health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kenig J, Richter P. Definition of the rectum and level of the peritoneal reflection—still a matter of debate? Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013;8:183–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards and the journal. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Downing A, Morris EJ, Richards M, et al. Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12–36 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:616–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lange MM, den Dulk M, Bossema ER, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. Brit J Surg 2007;94;1278–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2012;255:922–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ekkarat P, Boonpipattanapong T, Tantiphlachiva K, Sangkhathat S. Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection: a study in Thai patients. Asian J Surg. 2015 Doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.07.003

  26. Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1130–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Bruin AF, Schouten SB, de Kort PP, Gosselink MP, van der Harst E. The impact of chronic smoking on rectal mucosal blood flow. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13(4):269–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mary Wagner, Administrative Assistant, University of Arizona Cancer Center, for help with this work.

Funding

Supported by Grant R01 CA106912, “Health-Related Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Survivors With Stomas,” from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with resources and the use of facilities provided at the Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Tucson, Arizona, and Kaiser Permanente.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Arizona or Kaiser Permanente.

Disclosures

Dr. Herrinton has had research contracts in the past 3 years with MedImmune that was unrelated to this study. The other authors have no disclosures.

Ethical Approval

All studies were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Arizona and Kaiser Permanente.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa J. Herrinton PhD.

Additional information

The original article has been updated: Mark C. Hornbrook's last name has been corrected as reflected in the erratum.

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6056-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alavi, M., Wendel, C.S., Krouse, R.S. et al. Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3596–3603 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6017-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6017-x

Keywords

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Long-term Cancer Survivors
  • Temporary Ostomy
  • Bowel Function Index (BFI)
  • Anal Verge