Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Wire-localized excision of nonpalpable breast cancer is imprecise, resulting in positive margins 25–30% of the time.

Methods

Patients underwent preoperative supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A radiologist outlined the tumor edges on consecutive images, creating a three-dimensional (3D) view of its location. Using 3D printing, a bra-like plastic form (the Breast Cancer Locator [BCL]) was fabricated, with features that allowed a surgeon to (1) mark the edges of the tumor on the breast surface; (2) inject blue dye into the breast 1 cm from the tumor edges; and (3) place a wire in the tumor at the time of surgery.

Results

Nineteen patients with palpable cancers underwent partial mastectomy after placement of surgical cues using patient-specific BCLs. The cues were in place in <5 min and no adverse events occurred. The BCL accurately localized 18/19 cancers. In the 18 accurately localized cases, all 68 blue-dye injections were outside of the tumor edges. Median distance from the blue-dye center to the pathologic tumor edge was 1.4 cm, while distance from the blue dye to the tumor edge was <5 mm in 4% of injections, 0.5–2.0 cm in 72% of injections, and >2 cm in 24% of injections. Median distance from the tumor center to the BCL-localized wire and to the clip placed at the time of diagnosis was similar (0.49 vs. 0.73 cm) on specimen mammograms.

Conclusions

Information on breast cancer location and shape derived from a supine MRI can be transferred safely and accurately to patients in the operating room using a 3D-printed form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barth R, Gibson G, Carney P, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP, et al. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:324–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong J, Kaelin C, Troyan S, Gadd MA, Gelman R, Lester SC, et al. Prospective study of wide excision alone for DCIS of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1031–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lovrics P, Goldsmith C, Hodgson N, McCready D, Gohla G, Boylan C, et al. A multicentered, randomized controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schnabel F, Boolbol S, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margiin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1589–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapgar A, Killelea B, Tsangaris T, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heil J, Breitkruz K, Golatta M, Czink E, Dahlkamp J, Rom J, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breats conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective study cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abe S, Hill J, Han Y, Walsh K, Symanowski JT, Hadzikadic‐Gusic L, et al. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:443–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manell J, Morris E, Dershaw D, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L, et al. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and MRI. Breast J. 2005;11:382–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang E, Kinkel K, Esserman L, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM, et al. MRI in patients diagnosed with DCIS: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1207–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boetes C, Mus R, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis P, Staiger M, Harris K, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS, et al. Breast cancer measurements with MRI, ultrasonography and mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 1996;37:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakakibara M, Yokomizu J, Shima N, Kazama T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto R, et al. MRI guided quadrantectomy in patients with DCIS detected pre-operatively by mammographic calcifications. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pallone M, Poplack S, Avutu H, Paulsen KD, Barth RJ. Supine breast MRI and 3D optical scanning: a novel approach to improve tumor localization for breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2203–08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibson G, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ, et al. A comparison of ink directed and traditional whole cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krekel N, Haloua M, Lopes Cardozo A, de Wit RH, Bosch AM, de widt-Levert LM, et al. Intra-op US guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2103; 14: 448–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore M, Whitney L, Cerilli L, Imbrie JZ, Bunch M, Simpson VB, et al. Intra-operative US is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable intraductal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Drs. Barth, Krishnaswamy and Paulsen have ownership interest in CairnSurgical LLC. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) Grant R43 CA210810 to CairnSurgical LLC, and a Synergy Clinician Entrepreneur Fellowship to Richard J. Barth. Timothy B. Rooney, Wendy A. Wells, Elizabeth Rizzo, Christina V. Angeles, Jonathan D. Marotti, Rebecca A. Zuurbier, and Candice C. Black have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Barth Jr. MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barth, R.J., Krishnaswamy, V., Paulsen, K.D. et al. A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 2950–2956 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5979-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5979-z

Keywords

Navigation