Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Pancreas-Compressionless Gastrectomy”: A Novel Laparoscopic Approach for Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In radical operations for gastric cancer, a balance between the quality of lymph node dissection and safety of surgery must be ensured. During suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), an adequate operative field should be safely and effectively established to reduce pancreas-related complications. We present a novel approach that avoids direct compression of the pancreas in LG and describe the surgical outcomes of this method.

Methods

We historically compressed the pancreas during suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in LG to obtain an adequate operative field but have since modified our operative technique. In our new method introduced in March 2016, the operative field is established by pulling and controlling the connective tissues along the inferior border of the pancreas and the nerves along the common hepatic and splenic arteries, instead of directly compressing the pancreas itself. We compared 51 patients in the compression group (January 2015–February 2016) and 45 patients in the compressionless group (March 2016–January 2017) in terms of surgical outcomes, including the amylase concentration in the drainage fluid and postoperative complications.

Results

The amylase concentrations in the compressionless group were significantly lower on postoperative days 1 and 3 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively) compared with the compression group. The rates of severe postoperative pancreatic fistula and intra-abdominal infectious complications decreased from 11.8 to 2.2% (p = 0.116) and from 17.6 and 2.2% (p = 0.018), respectively.

Conclusions

Our approach, termed “pancreas-compressionless gastrectomy,” can be considered a safe and useful method to prevent postoperative infectious complications in LG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(2):146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):446–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hosono S, Arimoto Y, Ohtani H, Kanamiya Y. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(47):7676–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yakoub D, Athanasiou T, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an alternative to the open approach? Surg Oncol. 2009;18(4):322–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):39–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(4):238–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y. Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications. Surgery. 2011;149(1):15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujita T, Ohta M, Ozaki Y, et al. Collateral thermal damage to the pancreas by ultrasonic instruments during lymph node dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(3):281–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao XF, Jung MR, Kim KY, Park YK. Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(12):3418–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC, van der Tweel I, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1509–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. Excellent long-term prognosis and favorable postoperative nutritional status after laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5828-0

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Tokunaga M, et al. Left-sided approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy without duodenal transection. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(2):106–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Kubota T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2676–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Irino T, Hiki N, Ohashi M, Nunobe S, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):245–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1427–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao T, Lau BE, Yamaguchi T, et al. Experimental analyses of the cavitation generated by ultrasonically activated surgical devices. Surg Today. 2016;47(1), 122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, et al. The anatomical location of the pancreas is associated with the incidence of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12): 5481–5489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi N, Shinohara H, Haruta S, et al. Process of pancreas head as a risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

No grant support or institutional/corporate affiliations are associated with this study.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoki Hiki MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsujiura, M., Hiki, N., Ohashi, M. et al. “Pancreas-Compressionless Gastrectomy”: A Novel Laparoscopic Approach for Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3331–3337 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5974-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5974-4

Keywords

Navigation