Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Moderately and Poorly Differentiated Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: Survival Outcomes and Patient Selection

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the appendix represents an aggressive histological variant with a high risk of recurrence and death.

Methods

Overall, 178 patients with moderately and poorly differentiated appendiceal adenocarcinoma were identified from a prospective database. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors were analyzed for outcomes.

Results

Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) identified radiographic occult peritoneal metastasis in 25 (42%) patients. These patients had a significantly lower peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and improved overall survival (OS) compared with those with radiographic disease. Twenty-seven (41%) patients were excluded from cytoreductive surgery (CRS) because of findings on DL, while 116 (65%) patients underwent CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 23 months. Mucinous histology (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, p = 0.04) and PCI (HR 1.054, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of DFS. The median OS following CRS and HIPEC was 48 months. Mucinous histology (HR 0.352, p = 0.018), signet ring cells (HR 3.34, p = 0.02), positive peritoneal cytology (HR 0.081, p = 0.04), and PCI (HR 1.076, p = 0.004) were independently associated with OS. Eight-five (73.3%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 40 (47.1%) patients achieved a radiographic response; 36 (42.3%) had stable disease, while 9 (10.6%) had progressive disease. Stable or responsive disease was associated with improved median OS of 44 months, compared with 21 months for those with progressive disease (p = 0.011).

Conclusions

In selected patients, long-term survival can be obtained. Mucinous histology, absence of signet ring cells, negative peritoneal cytology, PCI ≤ 20, and response/stable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are important selection criteria for CRS and HIPEC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chua TC, et al. Early- and long-term outcome data of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendiceal origin treated by a strategy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(20):2449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Votanopoulos KI, et al. Peritoneal surface disease (PSD) from appendiceal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): overview of 481 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(4):1274–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart JH, et al. Appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination: outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(5):624–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugarbaker PH, Chang D. Results of treatment of 385 patients with peritoneal surface spread of appendiceal malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(8):727–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Austin F, et al. Aggressive management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from mucinous appendiceal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(5):1386–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Davison JM, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: identification of factors predicting survival and proposed criteria for a three-tiered assessment of tumor grade. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(11):1521–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shetty S, et al. Proposed classification of pseudomyxoma peritonei: influence of signet ring cells on survival. Am Surg. 2013;79(11):1171–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Overman MJ, et al. Improving the AJCC/TNM staging for adenocarcinomas of the appendix: the prognostic impact of histological grade. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):1072–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lieu CH, et al. Systemic chemotherapy and surgical cytoreduction for poorly differentiated and signet ring cell adenocarcinomas of the appendix. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(3):652–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polanco PM, et al. Outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion in patients with high-grade, high-volume disseminated mucinous appendiceal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Asare EA, et al. The impact of stage, grade, and mucinous histology on the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the appendix: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2016;122(2):213–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choe JH, et al. Improved survival with anti-VEGF therapy in the treatment of unresectable appendiceal epithelial neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2578–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Sweringen HL, et al. Predictors of survival in patients with high-grade peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surgery. 2012;152(4):617–24 (discussion 624–5).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grotz TE, et al. Intrathoracic chemoperfusion decreases recurrences in patients with full-thickness diaphragm involvement with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(9):2914–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jayakrishnan TT, et al. Role of laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal metastases considered for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tabrizian P, et al. Incorporation of diagnostic laparoscopy in the management algorithm for patients with peritoneal metastases: a multi-institutional analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015; 111(8):1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iversen LH, Rasmussen PC, Laurberg S. Value of laparoscopy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg. 2013;100(2):285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dineen SP, et al. A simplified preoperative assessment predicts complete cytoreduction and outcomes in patients with low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3640–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Flicek K, et al. Correlation of radiologic with surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index scores in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei and peritoneal carcinomatosis: how well can we predict resectability? J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(2):307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. El Halabi H, et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in patients with high-grade appendiceal carcinoma and extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):110–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Omohwo C, et al. Complete cytoreduction offers longterm survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal tumors of unfavorable histology. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(3):308–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugarbaker PH. Epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. Cancer J. 2009;15(3):225–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro JF, et al. Modern systemic chemotherapy in surgically unresectable neoplasms of appendiceal origin: a single-institution experience. Cancer. 2010;116(2):316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gough DB, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Long-term patient survival with an aggressive regional approach. Ann Surg. 1994;219(2):112–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith JW, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 1992;70(2):396–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baumgartner JM, et al. Predictors of progression in high-grade appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1716–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baratti D, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: clinical pathological and biological prognostic factors in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(2):526–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Halabi HE, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in patients with high-grade appendiceal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):122–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trilling B, et al. Intraperitoneal-free cancer cells represent a major prognostic factor in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):615–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yonemura Y, et al. Treatment failure following complete cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2016;43(12):1435–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge Harold Allen, Sun and Do Lee, and Andrew Shroeder for their contribution to gastrointestinal cancer research at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Disclosures

Travis E. Grotz, Michael J. Overman, Cathy Eng, Kanwal P. Raghav, Richard E. Royal, Paul F. Mansfield, Gary N. Mann, Kristen A. Robinson, Karen A. Beaty, Safia Rafeeq, Aurelio Matamoros, Melissa W. Taggart, and Keith F. Fournier have no disclosures to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith F. Fournier MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grotz, T.E., Overman, M.J., Eng, C. et al. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Moderately and Poorly Differentiated Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: Survival Outcomes and Patient Selection. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 2646–2654 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5938-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5938-8

Keywords

Navigation