Skip to main content

Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases in Apparent Stage I Low-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine oncological outcomes and incidence of lymph node (LN) metastases in women who underwent systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of apparent stage I low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (LGEOC).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was performed at nine institutions across Europe and the US, and patients who underwent surgical staging for presumed stage I LGEOC between 2000 and 2016 were included. To ensure surgical quality, a minimum number of ≥10 pelvic and ≥10 paraaortic LNs was required. Patients with preoperative radiologic or clinical evidence of extraovarian or LN disease, and those with nonepithelial histology, were excluded.

Results

The overall incidence of LN metastases was 4.3% in the 163 evaluated patients, and the incidence of LN involvement in serous, endometrioid, and mucinous subtypes was 10.7, 1.5, and 0%, respectively. However, Upstaging due to LN involvement alone occurred in only 2.4% of the patients. Eighty-nine (54.6%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy due to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC or higher disease. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.4–97.1%) and 94.5% (95% CI 90.9–98.0%), respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between LN-negative and LN-positive patients. However, fewer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy in the LN-negative group. Multivariate analysis did not identify any independent prognostic factor of survival.

Conclusion

The risk of LN involvement in nonserous apparent stage I LGEOC appears low, with a rate of <1% in this retrospective analysis, raising questions about the value of lymphadenectomy in those patients. Larger-scale prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the oncologic safety of omitting systematic LN staging in apparent stage I nonserous LGEOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al. Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28:496–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bonome T. Expression profıling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2005;65(22):10602–10612.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al. Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:361–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Colombo N, Peiretti M, Parma G, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl. 5: v23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Berek J, Crum C, Friedlander M. FIGO Cancer Report. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;119 Suppl 2;S118–S129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T, et al. Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer. 2006;18;95(6):699–704.

  7. 7.

    Powless CA, Aletti GD, Bakkum-Gamez JN, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):536–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K, et al. Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):656–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T, et al. Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):305–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lago V, Minig L, Fotopoulou C. Incidence of lymph node metastases in apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(8):1407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Prat J; FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 124(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK, et al. Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(1):12–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ho CM, Chien TY, Shih BY, et al. Evaluation of complete surgical staging with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy for improvement of survival in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88:394–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Oshita T, Itamochi H, Nishimura R, et al. Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18(6):1107–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhou J, Shan G, Chen Y. The effect of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(8):718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nasioudis D, Chapman-Davis E, Witkin SS, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy and prevalence of lymph node metastasis in clinically-apparent stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(2):414–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D, et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol.2009;114(1):48–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Lucas Minig, Florian Heitz, David Cibula, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Anna Germanova, Sean C. Dowdy, Eleftheria Kalogera, Ignacio Zapardiel, Kristina Lindemann, Philip Harter, Giovanni Scambia, Marco Petrillo, Cristina Zorrero, Vanna Zanagnolo, José Miguel Cárdenas Rebollo, Andreas du Bois, and Christina Fotopoulou declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Minig MD, PhD, MBA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minig, L., Heitz, F., Cibula, D. et al. Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases in Apparent Stage I Low-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 2720–2726 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5919-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Apparent Stage
  • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
  • Presumed Stage
  • Surgical Staging
  • Nonepithelial Histology