Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Factors for Locoregional Recurrence in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radical Two-Field Lymph Node Dissection: Results from Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To aim of this study was to determine the clinical and biological prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing radical two-field lymph node dissection (2FLD).

Methods

A total of 462 patients diagnosed with thoracic ESCC underwent radical esophagectomy between March 2001 and May 2010 at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. Clinical characteristics, CD44 expression, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels were evaluated in 198 patients who underwent R0 dissection with long-term follow-up. Partial Cox regression analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to validate the selected risk factors.

Results

With a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS) rate of 198 patients was 62.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage (p = 0.043), pathological positive tumor above the carina (p = 0.000), CD44 expression level (p = 0.045) and TIL level (p = 0.007) were prognostic factors for LFFS, while the Cox model with risk scores had an area under the curve value of 83.6% for the prediction of 5-year LFFS. The best cut-off value (sum score = 11.19) was used to determine the high- and low-risk groups, with patients at high risk having a significantly shorter 5-year LFFS than patients at low risk (p = 0.000). The LRR pattern revealed significantly high incidences of recurrent disease at the supraclavicular and cervical sites, mediastinum (above the carina), and anastomosis.

Conclusions

Our predictive model was able to distinguish between patients at high risk for LRR and patients at low risk for LRR. LRR primarily involved the upper thorax and this area must be considered in future study designs for radical trimodality treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakagawa S, Kanda T, Kosugi S, Ohashi M, Suzuki T, Hatakeyama K. Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Zhang Y, Cai H, Xiang J. Pattern of lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang W, Li B, Gong H, Yu J, Sun H, Zhou T, et al. Pattern of lymph node metastases and its implication in radiotherapeutic clinical target volume in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a report of 1077 cases. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:229–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Liu S, Pan J, Zheng X, Zhu K, Zhu J, et al. The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:480–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding X, Zhang J, Li B, Wang Z, Huang W, Zhou T, et al. A meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis rate for patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer and its implication in delineation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e1110–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ronellenfitsch U, Schwarzbach M, Hofheinz R, Kienle P, Kieser M, Slanger TE, et al. Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: systematic review with meta-analysis combining individual patient and aggregate data. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:3149–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Daly JM, Fry WA, Little AG, Winchester DP, McKee RF, Stewart AK, et al. Esophageal cancer: results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:562–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zoller M. CD44: Can a cancer-initiating cell profit from an abundantly expressed molecule? Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:254–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao JS, Li WJ, Ge D, Zhang PJ, Li JJ, Lu CL, et al. Tumor initiating cells in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas express high levels of CD44. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e21419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Biddle A, Gammon L, Fazil B, Mackenzie IC. CD44 staining of cancer stem-like cells is influenced by down-regulation of CD44 variant isoforms and up-regulation of the standard CD44 isoform in the population of cells that have undergone epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e57314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Minato T, Yamamoto Y, Seike J, Yoshida T, Yamai H, Takechi H, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:209–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Bras GF, Allison GL, Richards NF, Ansari SS, Washington MK, Andl CD. CD44 upregulation in E-cadherin-negative esophageal cancers results in cell invasion. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e27063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Näsman A, Nordfors C, Grün N, Munck-Wikland E, Ramqvist T, Marklund L, et al. Absent/weak CD44 intensity and positive human papillomavirus (HPV) status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma indicates a very high survival. Cancer Med. 2013;2:507–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko YH, Won HS, Jeon EK, Hong SH, Roh SY, Hong YS, et al. Prognostic significance of CD44s expression in resected non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2011;11:340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohtani H. Focus on TILs: prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Immun. 2007;7:4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Adams S, Gray RJ, Demaria S, Goldstein L, Perez EA, Shulman LN, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2959–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dieci MV, Mathieu MC, Guarneri V, Conte P, Delaloge S, Andre F, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1698–1704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, et al. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:203–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas NE, Busam KJ, From L, Kricker A, Armstrong BK, Anton-Culver H, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte grade in primary melanomas is independently associated with melanoma-specific survival in the population-based genes, environment and melanoma study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4252–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zingg U, Montani M, Frey DM, Dirnhofer S, Esterman AJ, Went P, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:670–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cho Y, Miyamoto M, Kato K, Fukunaga A, Shichinohe T, Kawarada Y, et al. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells cooperate to improve prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1555–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schumacher K, Haensch W, Roefzaad C, Schlag PM. Prognostic significance of activated CD8(+) T cell infiltrations within esophageal carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3932–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ikeguchi M, Saito H, Katano K, Tsujitani S, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Correlation between the lymphocytic infiltration of tumors and the proliferative activity of cancer cells from surgically treated esophageal carcinoma. Oncology 1997;54:311–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. Clinicopathological aspects. In: Guidelines for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus. 9. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd; 1999. pp. 1–34.

  28. Tachimori Y, Nagai Y, Kanamori N, Hokamura N, Igaki H. Pattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage system. Dis Esophagus 2011;24:33–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nishihira T, Hirayama K, Mori S. A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Surg. 1998;175:47–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Extended esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1383–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rizk N, Venkatraman E, Park B, Flores R, Bains MS, Rusch V, American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1374–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Urba SG, Orringer MB, Strawderman M, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):305–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Denham JW, Gebski V, Fitzgerald L, Simes RJ, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: A randomized controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(9):659–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, Van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.

  35. Oppedijk V, Van der Gaast A, Van Lanschot JJ, Van Hagen P, Van Os R, Van Rij CM, et al. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bourguignon LY. Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 activation of RhoGTPase signaling and cytoskeleton function promotes tumor progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu H, Tian Y, Yuan X, Liu Y, Wu H, Liu Q, et al. Enrichment of CD44 in basal-type breast cancer correlates with EMT, cancer stem cell gene profile, and prognosis. Oncotargets Ther. 2016;9:431–44.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li X, Ma X, Chen L, Gu L, Zhang Y, Zhang F, et al. Prognostic value of CD44 expression in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gooden MJ, de Bock GH, Leffers N, Daemen T, Nijman HW. The prognostic influence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2011;105:93–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ténière P, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, et al. Postoperative radiation therapy does not increase survival after curative resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle and lower esophagus as shown by a multicentered controlled trial. French University Association for Surgical Research. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;173:123–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fok M, Sham JS, Choy D, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Surgery 1993;113:138–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zieren HU, Muller JM, Jacobi CA, et al. Adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy after curative resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a prospective randomized study. World J Surg. 1995;19:444–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schreiber D, Rineer J, Vongtama D, et al. Impact of postoperative radiation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(2):244–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen J, Zhu J, Pan J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy improved survival of poor prognostic squamous cell carcinoma esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(2):435–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. SongRan Liu and Dr. Li Ma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center for data collection, Dr. ZhongXin Liao, MD Anderson Cancer Center for coordination of the international study, and Ms. YiXin Xiong for managing the samples.

Funding

This research was supported by (i) Funds from the University Cancer Foundation via the Sister Institution Network Fund at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and, in part, by the National Institutes of Health through University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672, as a portion of these studies were performed at the North Campus Flow Cytometry and Cellular Imaging Core (Principal Investigator: Ronald A. DePinho), and (ii) Funds from the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Liu MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None.

Additional information

ShiLiang Liu, Simone Anfossi and Bo Qiu contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Anfossi, S., Qiu, B. et al. Prognostic Factors for Locoregional Recurrence in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radical Two-Field Lymph Node Dissection: Results from Long-Term Follow-Up. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 966–973 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5652-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5652-y

Keywords

Navigation