Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Singular Hope: How the Discussion Around Cancer Surgery Sometimes Fails

  • Palliative Care
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with cancer often have an overly optimistic view of prognosis, as well as potential benefits of treatment. Patient–surgeon communication in the preoperative period has not received as much attention as communicating prognosis or bad news in the postoperative setting.

Methods

The published literature on patient–physician communication in the preoperative setting among patients considering surgery for a malignant indication was reviewed. PubMed was queried for MESH terms including “surgery,” “preoperative,” “discussion,” “treatment goals,” “patient perceptions,” and “cure.” Information on how surgeons and patients may be empowered to improve communication about goals of care was also outlined.

Results

Physicians tended not to dwell on prognosis in early discussions, instead emphasizing the uniqueness of individuals and the uncertainty of statistics. The treatment plan often became the dominant feature of the conversation and functioned to deflect attention from discussions of prognosis. Surgeons tended to understate possible complications and provided little detail regarding potential severity or long-term consequences. While most patients wished to be informed of their prognosis, only a subset actually received an estimate of life expectancy. Because optimism with respect to prognosis (often simplified as “hope”) has been largely considered essential for positivity and optimism—even a false or inappropriate optimism—many providers have created, tolerated, or enabled it. Several studies have emphasized, however, that hope can be maintained with truthful discussion, even if the topic is a bad prognosis or eventual death.

Conclusions

Open, honest, and patient-driven discussions before surgery will lead to more robust shared decision making and create more engaged and satisfied patients (and caregivers). Enhanced preoperative discussion can also facilitate clarity about the possibility of cancer recurrence, cure, preferences about advance care planning, and formation of advance directives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kim Y, Winner M, Page A, et al. Patient perceptions regarding the likelihood of cure after surgical resection of lung and colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2015;121:3564–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, et al. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4575–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weeks JC, Catalano PJ, Cronin A, et al. Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1616–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen AB, Cronin A, Weeks JC, et al. Expectations about the effectiveness of radiation therapy among patients with incurable lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2730–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Slevin ML, Stubbs L, Plant HJ, et al. Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ. 1990;300:1458–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Blazeby JM, Macefield R, Blencowe NS, et al. Core information set for oesophageal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102:936–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McNair AG, Brookes ST, Kinnersley P, Blazeby JM. What surgeons should tell patients with oesophago-gastric cancer: a cross sectional study of information needs. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:1278–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ejaz A, Kim Y, Winner M, et al. Associations between patient perceptions of communication, cure, and other patient-related factors regarding patient-reported quality of care following surgical resection of lung and colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:812–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Enzinger AC, Zhang B, Schrag D, Prigerson HG. Outcomes of prognostic disclosure: associations with prognostic understanding, distress, and relationship with physician among patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3809–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300:1665–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith TJ, Dow LA, Virago E, Khatcheressian J, Lyckholm LJ, Matsuyama R. Giving honest information to patients with advanced cancer maintains hope. Oncology. 2010;24:521–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith TJ, Dow LA, Virago EA, Khatcheressian J, Matsuyama R, Lyckholm LJ. A pilot trial of decision aids to give truthful prognostic and treatment information to chemotherapy patients with advanced cancer. J Support Oncol. 2011;9:79–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. The AM, Hak T, Koeter G, van Der Wal G. Collusion in doctor–patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ. 2000;321:1376–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kruser JM, Pecanac KE, Brasel KJ, et al. “And I think that we can fix it”: mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making. Ann Surg. 2015;261:678–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pecanac KE, Kehler JM, Brasel KJ, et al. It’s big surgery: preoperative expressions of risk, responsibility, and commitment to treatment after high-risk operations. Ann Surg. 2014;259:458–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuster RA, Hong SY, Arnold RM, White DB. Do physicians disclose uncertainty when discussing prognosis in grave critical illness? Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2012;2:125–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Back AL, Arnold RM. Discussing prognosis: “how much do you want to know?” Talking to patients who are prepared for explicit information. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4209–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies E, Clarke C, Hopkins A. Malignant cerebral glioma—II: perspectives of patients and relatives on the value of radiotherapy. BMJ. 1996;313:1512–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough DL, Meropol NJ, Maynard K, Emanuel EJ. Patients’ decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4479–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McNair AG, MacKichan F, Donovan JL, et al. What surgeons tell patients and what patients want to know before major cancer surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:791–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ. Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2389–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alston C, Paget L, Halvorson GC, et al. Communicating with patients on health care evidence. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2012. http://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/evidence.

  24. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, et al. Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients’ views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1278–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA, SCRN Communication Team. The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology. 2005;14:831–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanco K, Rhondali W, Perez-Cruz P, et al. Patient perception of physician compassion after a more optimistic vs a less optimistic message: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:176–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller DL, Manne SL, Taylor K, Keates J, Dougherty J. Psychological distress and well-being in advanced cancer: the effects of optimism and coping. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1996;3:115–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedman LC, Kalidas M, Elledge R, et al. Optimism, social support and psychosocial functioning among women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carver CS, Pozo-Kaderman C, Harris SD, et al. Optimism versus pessimism predicts the quality of women’s adjustment to early stage breast cancer. Cancer. 1994;73:1213–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kodish E, Post SG. Oncology and hope. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1817.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Helft PR. Necessary collusion: prognostic communication with advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3146–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Groopman J. The anatomy of hope. New York: Random House; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Back AL, Arnold RM, Quill TE. Hope for the best, and prepare for the worst. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:439–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Breslin TM, Hess KR, Harbison DB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: treatment variables and survival duration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Norals TE, Smith TJ. Advance care planning discussions: why they should happen, why they don’t, and how we can facilitate the process. Oncology. 2015;29:567–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lagarde SM, Franssen SJ, van Werven JR, et al. Patient preferences for the disclosure of prognosis after esophagectomy for cancer with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hudak PL, Armstrong K, Braddock C 3rd, Frankel RM, Levinson W. Older patients’ unexpressed concerns about orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1427–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper Z, Koritsanszky LA, Cauley CE, et al. Recommendations for best communication practices to facilitate goal-concordant care for seriously ill older patients with emergency surgical conditions. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobsen J, Jackson V, Dahlin C, et al. Components of early outpatient palliative care consultation in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer. J Palliat Med. 2011;14:459–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:907–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Megan Winner MS, MD, Ana Wilson DO & Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly MD

  2. Program in Palliative Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Thomas J. Smith MD

  3. Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Thomas J. Smith MD

  4. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

    Timothy M. Pawlik MD, MPH, PhD

Authors
  1. Megan Winner MS, MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Wilson DO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas J. Smith MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Timothy M. Pawlik MD, MPH, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy M. Pawlik MD, MPH, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winner, M., Wilson, A., Ronnekleiv-Kelly, S. et al. A Singular Hope: How the Discussion Around Cancer Surgery Sometimes Fails. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 31–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5564-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5564-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation