Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colorectal Specialization Increases Lymph Node Yield: Evidence from a National Database

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Current guidelines recommend the evaluation of at least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) in the pathologic specimen following surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). We sought to examine the role of colorectal specialization on nodal identification.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER-Medicare data to examine the association between colorectal specialization and LN identification following surgery for colon and rectal adenocarcinoma between 2001 and 2009. Our dataset included patients >65 years who underwent surgical resection for CRC. We excluded patients with rectal cancer who had received neoadjuvant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the number of LNs identified in the pathologic specimen following surgery for CRC. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the association between surgical specialization and LN identification in the pathologic specimen.

Results

In multivariate analysis, odds of an adequate lymphadenectomy following surgery with a colorectal specialist were 1.32 and 1.41 times greater for colon and rectal cancer, respectively, than following surgery by a general surgeon (p < 0.001). These odds increased to 1.36 and 1.58, respectively, when analysis was limited to board-certified colorectal surgeons. Hospital factors associated with ≥12 LNs identified included high-volume CRC surgery (colon OR 1.84, p < 0.001; rectal OR 1.78, p < 0.001) and NCI-designated Cancer Centers (colon OR 1.75, p < 0.001; rectal OR 1.64; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Colorectal specialization and, in particular, board-certification in colorectal surgery, is significantly associated with increased LN identification following surgery for colon and rectal adenocarcinoma since the adoption of the 12-LN guideline in 2001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2011. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/ (Based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site). Accessed Apr 2014.

  2. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;327:1479–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T. Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(4):335–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(6):433–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):602–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, Haller DG. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(15):2912–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM, Begun JW, McGovern PM, Virnig BA. Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years. JAMA. 2011;306:1089–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nathan H, Shore AD, Anders RA, Wick EC, Gearhart SL, Pawlik TM. Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:471–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbas A, Turley R, Mantyh C, Migaly J. Advanced fellowship training is associated with improved lymph node retrieval in colon cancer resections. J Surg Res. 2011;170:e41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholl MB, Wright BE, Conway WC, Aarnes-Leong T, Sim MS, Faries MB. Does specialized surgical training increase lymph node yield in colon cancer? Am Surg. 2009;10:887–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40(8):3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wichmann MW, Müller C, Meyer G, et al. Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2002;137(2):206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(12):1258–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Talamonti MS, Winchester DP, Russell TR, Ko CY. Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(18):1310–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Parsons HM, Begun JW, McGovern PM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM, Virnig BA. Hospital characteristics associated with maintenance or improvement of guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation for colon cancer. Med Care. 2013;51(1):60–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Waters JA, Chihara R, Moreno J. Laparoscopic colectomy: does the learning curve extend beyond colorectal surgery fellowship? JSLS. 2010;14:325–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 28:272–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):821–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Monson JR, Probst CP, Wexner SD, et al. Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: the association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann Surg. 2014;260(4):625–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: E.C.P. and S.S.; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data: all authors; drafting of manuscript: E.C.P. and A.N.J.; critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content: all authors; statistical analysis: E.C.P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjun N. Jeganathan MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeganathan, A.N., Shanmugan, S., Bleier, J.I.S. et al. Colorectal Specialization Increases Lymph Node Yield: Evidence from a National Database. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 2258–2265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5122-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5122-6

Keywords

Navigation