Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery: Evaluation of Influencing Factors

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) can be associated with significant blood loss. Previous studies did not provide comprehensive data on blood loss in MSTS. Thorough study elaborating the blood loss, transfusion requirement, and their influencing factors is required. This study aimed to investigate the estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements associated with various surgical approaches and surgically managed vertebral levels for spinal metastases from different primary tumors.

Methods

The study retrospectively evaluated 243 patients who underwent surgery for metastatic spine tumors at the authors’ institution between 2005 and 2014. Estimated intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement were assessed for different primary tumors including lung, breast, prostate, gastrointestinal, renal, liver, thyroid, myeloma/lymphoma, and others; types of surgical procedure (cervical corpectomy ± stabilization, thoracolumbar posterior decompression ± instrumentation, thoracolumbar corpectomy, minimally invasive surgery); and levels of instrumentation and decompression. Multivariate linear regression was attempted to investigate the factors influencing blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Results

The mean blood loss was 870 ± 720 ml, and the average blood transfusion was 1.5 ± 1.9 U. The mean blood loss was 1103 ml for patients who received blood transfusion and 597 ml for those who did not. Multivariate analysis showed that the significant factors influencing blood loss were primary tumor, type of surgery, and prolonged operative time. The influencing factors for blood transfusion were primary tumor, type of surgery, preoperative hemoglobin, and prolonged operative time.

Conclusions

Significant variations in blood loss and transfusion requirement were based on primary tumor of spinal metastases, surgical approaches, and operative time. These findings will help clinicians in preoperative planning to address the problem of blood loss during MSTS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen Y, Tai BC, Nayak D, et al. Blood loss in spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease: a meta-analysis. Bone Jt J. 2013;95-B:683–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holman PJ, Suki D, McCutcheon I, Wolinsky JP, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL. Surgical management of metastatic disease of the lumbar spine: experience with 139 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:550–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu R, Garces-Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, et al. Thoracic vertebrectomy and spinal reconstruction via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches: clinical outcomes in 91 consecutive patients with metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:272–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt R, Rupp-Heim G, Dammann F, Ulrich C, Nothwang J. Surgical therapy of vertebral metastases: are there predictive parameters for intraoperative excessive blood loss despite preoperative embolization? Tumori. 2011;97:66–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kouritas V, Graham S, Marwah G, Papastefanou SL. Can we reduce routine blood ordering in spinal surgery? Transfus Altern Transfus Med. 2010;11:138–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar N, Zaw AS, Reyes MR, et al. Versatility of percutaneous pedicular screw fixation in metastatic spine tumor surgery: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1604–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilsky MH, Fraser JF. Complication avoidance in vertebral column spine tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006;17:317–29-vii.

  8. Hu SS. Blood loss in adult spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S3–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs WB, Perrin RG. Evaluation and treatment of spinal metastases: an overview. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;11:e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abe E, Kobayashi T, Murai H, Suzuki T, Chiba M, Okuyama K. Total spondylectomy for primary malignant, aggressive benign, and solitary metastatic bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. J Spinal Disord. 2001;14:237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen YJ, Chang GC, Chen HT, et al. Surgical results of metastatic spinal cord compression secondary to non-small cell lung cancer. Spine Phila 1976. 2007;32:E413–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho DC, Sung JK. Palliative surgery for metastatic thoracic and lumbar tumors using posterolateral transpedicular approach with posterior instrumentation. Surg Neurol. 2009;71:424–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Street J, Fisher C, Sparkes J, et al. Single-stage posterolateral vertebrectomy for the management of metastatic disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective study of an evolving surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Technol. 2007;20:509–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka M, Nakahara S, Ito Y, et al. Surgical treatment of metastatic vertebral tumors. Acta Med Okayama. 2009;63:145–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Olerud C, Jonsson H Jr, Lofberg AM, Lorelius LE, Sjostrom L. Embolization of spinal metastases reduces peroperative blood loss: 21 patients operated on for renal cell carcinoma. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64:9–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berkefeld J, Scale D, Kirchner J, Heinrich T, Kollath J. Hypervascular spinal tumors: influence of the embolization technique on perioperative hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:757–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manke C, Bretschneider T, Lenhart M, et al. Spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma: effect of preoperative particle embolization on intraoperative blood loss. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:997–1003.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deutsch H, Boco T, Lobel J. Minimally invasive transpedicular vertebrectomy for metastatic disease to the thoracic spine. J Spinal Disord Technol. 2008;21:101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheufler KM. Technique and clinical results of minimally invasive reconstruction and stabilization of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine with expandable cages and ventrolateral plate fixation. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:798–808 (Discussion 808–799).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau D, Chou D. Posterior thoracic corpectomy with cage reconstruction for metastatic spinal tumors: comparing the mini-open approach to the open approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:217–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alshryda S, Mason J, Sarda P, et al. Topical (intra-articular) tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion rates following total hip replacement: a randomized controlled trial (TRANX-H). J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2013;95:1969–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sukeik M, Alshryda S, Haddad FS, Mason JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol. 2011;93:39–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Badeaux J, Hawley D. A systematic review of the effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid administration in managing perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Perianesthes Nurs. 2014;29:459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang F, Wang K, Li FN, et al. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in spinal surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Clausen C, Dahl B, Frevert SC, Hansen LV, Nielsen MB, Lonn L. Preoperative embolization in surgical treatment of spinal metastases: single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of efficacy in decreasing intraoperative blood loss. JVIR J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:402–12; e401.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kawai A, Kadota H, Yamaguchi U, Morimoto Y, Ozaki T, Beppu Y. Blood loss and transfusion associated with musculoskeletal tumor surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:52–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Blajchman MA, Bordin JO. The tumor growth-promoting effect of allogeneic blood transfusions. Immunol Investig. 1995;24:311–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Blumberg N. Allogeneic transfusion and infection: economic and clinical implications. Semin Hematol. 1997;34(3 Suppl 2):34–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar N, Ahmed Q, Lee VK, et al. Can there be a place for intraoperative salvaged blood in spine tumor surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2436–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar N, Ahmed Q, Lee VK, Zaw AS, Goy R, Wong HK. Are we ready for the use of intraoperative salvaged blood in metastatic spine tumour surgery? Eur Spine J. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4112-x.

  31. Kumar N, Chen Y, Nath C, Liu EH. What is the role of autologous blood transfusion in major spine surgery? Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 2012;41:E89–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar N, Chen Y, Zaw AS, et al. Use of intraoperative cell-salvage for autologous blood transfusions in metastatic spine tumour surgery: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar N, Lam R, Zaw AS, et al. Flow cytometric evaluation of the safety of intraoperative salvaged blood filtered with leucocyte depletion filter in spine tumour surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4330–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank A/Prof Gabriel Liu, A/Prof Joseph Thambiah, A/Prof Hwan Tak Hee and Prof Hee-Kit Wong for contributing the cases. We also thank Chan Ee, K Perini, Amreet Kaur, Amanda, Yi Linn and Hilary for their contribution in data collection of the spine tumour patients.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naresh Kumar DM (Orth).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, N., Zaw, A.S., Khine, H.E. et al. Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery: Evaluation of Influencing Factors. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 2079–2086 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5092-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5092-8

Keywords

Navigation