Skip to main content
Log in

Melanoma Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes Following Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion Lymphadenectomy, and Adjuvant Interferon: Results from the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Quality of life (QOL) and physical condition (PC) outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), completion lymph node dissection (CLND), and adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b (IFN) were evaluated in this study.

Methods

Self-reported QOL and PC scores were evaluated in patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial evaluating adjuvant IFN. After SLN biopsy, patients with a positive SLN underwent CLND then were randomized to adjuvant IFN or observation. QOL and PC scores were compared between patients who underwent SLNB alone, CLND without IFN, and CLND with IFN. Time to return to baseline QOL and PC scores reported at the time of SLNB was recorded and compared.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in time to return to baseline QOL (p = 0.0018) and PC (p = 0.0018) scores across the three treatment groups. The time to return to baseline QOL and PC scores was similar for SLND and CLND alone. Differences in time to return to baseline QOL and PC were sustained when stratified by recurrence status but did not differ significantly for different lymph node regions. There was a delay in return to baseline QOL and PC condition scores that was sustained beyond the cessation of IFN therapy.

Conclusions

CLND is well-tolerated with a similar effect on self-reported QOL outcomes in both the short- and long-term compared with SLNB alone. IFN therapy is associated with worse QOL outcomes compared with SLNB and CLND, an effect that may be sustained following cessation of adjuvant IFN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(7):599–609.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown RE, Ross MI, Edwards MJ, et al. The prognostic significance of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3330–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiener M, Acland KM, Shaw HM, et al. Sentinel node positive melanoma patients: prediction and prognostic significance of nonsentinel node metastases and development of a survival tree model. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(8):1995–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ariyan C, Brady MS, Gonen M, Busam K, Coit D. Positive nonsentinel node status predicts mortality in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(1):186–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murali R, Desilva C, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. Factors predicting recurrence and survival in sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma patients. Ann Surg. 2011;253(6):1155–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bilimoria KY, Balch CM, Bentrem DJ, et al. Complete lymph node dissection for sentinel node-positive melanoma: assessment of practice patterns in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(6):1566–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong SL, Morton DL, Thompson JF, et al. Melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(6):809–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kingham TP, Panageas KS, Ariyan CE, Busam KJ, Brady MS, Coit DG. Outcome of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node who do not undergo completion lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(2):514–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Egger ME, Callender GG, McMasters KM, et al. Diversity of stage III melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):956–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McMasters KM, Egger ME, Edwards MJ, et al. Final results of the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial: a multi-institutional prospective randomized phase III study evaluating the role of adjuvant high-dose inteferon alfa-2b and completion lymph node dissection for patients staged by sentinely lymph node biopsy. J Clin Oncol. in press.

  11. Kirkwood JM, Strawderman MH, Ernstoff MS et al. Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(1):7–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mocellin S, Pasquali S, Rossi CR, Nitti D. Interferon alpha adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(7):493–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eggermont AM, Suciu S, Testori A, et al. Long-term results of the randomized phase III trial EORTC 18991 of adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus observation in resected stage III melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(31):3810–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grob JJ, Jouary T, Dreno B, et al. Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b (36 months) versus low-dose interferon alfa-2b (18 months) in melanoma patients without macrometastatic nodes: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 European Association for Dermato-Oncology (EADO) study. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(1):166–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garbe C, Radny P, Linse R, et al. Adjuvant low-dose interferon {alpha}2a with or without dacarbazine compared with surgery alone: a prospective-randomized phase III DeCOG trial in melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(6):1195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dixon S, Walters SJ, Turner L, Hancock BW. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha in malignant melanoma: results from randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(4):492–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bottomley A, Coens C, Suciu S, et al. Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus observation in resected stage III melanoma: a phase III randomized controlled trial of health-related quality of life and symptoms by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(18):2916–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brandberg Y, Aamdal S, Bastholt L, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with high-risk melanoma randomised in the Nordic phase 3 trial with adjuvant intermediate-dose interferon alfa-2b. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(13):2012–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McMasters KM, Noyes RD, Reintgen DS, et al. Lessons learned from the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86(4):212–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wrightson WR, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(6):676–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):302–11; discussion 311–3

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Vries M, Hoekstra HJ, Hoekstra-Weebers JE. Quality of life after axillary or groin sentinel lymph node biopsy, with or without completion lymph node dissection, in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2840–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziefle S, Egberts F, Heinze S, et al. Health-related quality of life before and during adjuvant interferon-alpha treatment for patients with malignant melanoma (DeCOG-trial). J Immunother. 2011;34(4):403–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pectasides D, Dafni U, Bafaloukos D, et al. Randomized phase III study of 1 month versus 1 year of adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b in patients with resected high-risk melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(6):939–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cormier JN, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prospective assessment of the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma questionnaire. Cancer. 2008;112(10):2249–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

This is a study of the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, which was sponsored by a grant from Schering Oncology Biotech. All data management and subsequent analysis has been performed independently at the University of Louisville. Schering Oncology Biotech was not involved in conduct of the trial, data analysis, or production of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly M. McMasters MD, PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1

Comparison of self-reported Physical Condition and Quality of Life Scores associated with the presence or absence of specific complaints (all p values for test of differences < 0.0001, error bars represent 95% confidence intervals). Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 68 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Time to return to baseline quality of life (A) and physical condition (B) scores in patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection. Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egger, M.E., Kimbrough, C.W., Stromberg, A.J. et al. Melanoma Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes Following Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion Lymphadenectomy, and Adjuvant Interferon: Results from the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 1019–1025 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5074-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5074-2

Keywords

Navigation