Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tracheal Autotransplantation for Functional Reconstruction of Extended Hemilaryngectomy Defects: A Single-Center Experience in 30 Patients

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tracheal autotransplantation is a reconstructive technique that allows for organ-sparing treatment of selected patients with advanced cricoid cartilage chondrosarcoma and T2 or T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (unilateral T2 with impaired vocal fold mobility; T3 with subglottic extension and/or arytenoid cartilage fixation). This study evaluated the functional and oncologic outcomes of an optimized autotransplant technique that the authors have been using since 2003.

Methods

The study retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent tracheal autotransplantation at the authors’ center between 2003 and 2015.

Results

The cohort included 30 patients: 7 with cricoid chondrosarcoma and 23 with laryngeal SCC. The median age of the patients was 60.5 years. The median follow-up period was 78 months. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 92 and 80 %, and the cause-specific survival rates were respectively 100 and 96 %. Only one patient experienced tumor recurrence. The temporary tracheostomy was closed in 22 patients (73 %). The laryngeal preservation rate was 90 %, with 25 patients (83 %) obtaining a functional voice and 25 patients (83 %) resuming normal oral feeding. The univariate analysis showed advanced age (>65 years) as a negative prognostic factor for functional outcome but exhibited no statistical influence of gender, tumor type or stage, or previous radiotherapy. Strikingly, all chondrosarcoma patients experienced optimal functional outcomes.

Conclusion

For this particular group of patients, the authors’ tracheal autotransplantation technique provides excellent functional results for respiration, speech, and swallowing without compromising the oncologic outcome. This is particularly true for patients younger than 65 years and for those with cricoid chondrosarcoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lagha A, Chraiet N, Labidi S, Rifi H, Ayadi M, Krimi S, et al. Larynx preservation: what is the best nonsurgical strategy? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88:447–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramakrishnan Y, Drinnan M, Kwong FNK, Grant DG, Mehanna H, Jones T, Paleri V. Oncologic outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery for radiorecurrent laryngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language literature. Head Neck. 2014;36:280–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delaere PR, Hermans R. Tracheal autotransplantation as a new and reliable technique for the functional treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:1244–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delaere P, Vander Poorten V, Vranckx J, Hierner R. Laryngeal repair after resection of advanced cancer: an optimal reconstructive protocol. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;262:910–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delaere P, Goeleven A, Vander Poorten V, Hermans R, Hierner R, Vranckx J. Organ preservation surgery for advanced unilateral glottic and subglottic cancer. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1764–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Delaere PR, Vranckx JJ, Dooms C, Meulemans J, Hermans R. Tracheal autotransplantation: guidelines for optimal functional outcome. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2091–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS, et al. Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:845–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartl DM. Evidence-based practice: management of glottic cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012;45:1143–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartl DM, Brasnu DF, Shah JP, Hinni ML, Takes RP, Olsen KD, et al. Is open surgery for head and neck cancers truly declining? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:2793–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schultz P. Vocal fold cancer. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128:301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Canis M, Ihler F, Martin A, Wolff H, Matthias C, Steiner W. Results of 226 patients with T3 laryngeal carcinoma after treatment with transoral laser microsurgery. Head Neck. 2014;36:652–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baatenburg RJ, Jong D, Lent S Van, Hogendoorn PCW. Chondroma and chondrosarcoma of the larynx. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauter A, Bersch C, Lambert KL, Hörmann K, Naim R. Chondrosarcoma of the larynx and review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:2925–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rinaldo A, Howard DJ, Ferlito A, et al. Laryngeal chondrosarcoma: a 24-year experience at The Royal National Throat, Nose, and Ear Hospital. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:680–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maclean J, Cotton S, Perry A. Postlaryngectomy: it’s hard to swallow: an Australian study of prevalence and self-reports of swallowing function after a total laryngectomy. Dysphagia. 2009;24:172–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweeny L, Golden JB, White HN, Magnuson JS, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL. Incidence and outcomes of stricture formation postlaryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146:395–402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maclean J, Szczesniak M, Cotton S, Cook I, Perry A. Impact of a laryngectomy and surgical closure technique on swallow biomechanics and dysphagia severity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144:21–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward EC, Bishop B, Frisby J, Stevens M. Swallowing outcomes following laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:181–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moon S, Raffa F, Ojo R, Landera Ma, Weed DT, Sargi Z, et al. Changing trends of speech outcomes after total laryngectomy in the 21st century: a single-center study. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:2508–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leong SC, Upile N, Lau A, Lancaster J, Praveen P, Rogers SN, et al. Extended vertical hemilaryngectomy and reconstruction with a neovascularised tracheal autograft for advanced unilateral laryngeal tumours: a learning curve. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:1729–3522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Delaere P, Vranckx J, Verleden G, De Leyn P, van Raemdonck D. Tracheal allotransplantation after withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:138–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Delaere PR, Vranckx JJ, Meulemans J, Vander Poorten V, Segers K, Van Raemdonck D, et al. Learning curve in tracheal allotransplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2538–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Delaere MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loos, E., Meulemans, J., Vranckx, J. et al. Tracheal Autotransplantation for Functional Reconstruction of Extended Hemilaryngectomy Defects: A Single-Center Experience in 30 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 1674–1683 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5033-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5033-y

Keywords

Navigation