Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Retrospective Analysis from 2005 to 2012 in the National Cancer Data Base

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) has been shown to reduce the risk of second breast cancer events in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). There is no population-level evaluation of AET use in DCIS patients after standardized reporting of estrogen receptor (ER) status in cancer registries in 2004.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with DCIS in the National Cancer Data Base between 2005 and 2012. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as well as temporal trends associated with receipt of AET were evaluated by generalized linear regression.

Results

Among 206,255 DCIS patients, 36.5 % received AET. Fewer than half of ER-positive patients (n = 62,146, 46.4 %) received AET, with a modest but significant increase over time (43.6 % in 2005 to 47.5 % in 2012; unadjusted p trend <0.001). AET decreased among ER-negative patients (8.9–6.5 %, p trend <0.001) over the same time period. On multivariate analysis, younger (<40 years) and older (≥70 years) women were less likely to receive AET than 50- to 59-year-old women (<40 years: relative risk 0.86, 95 % confidence interval 0.82–0.89; ≥70 years: relative risk 0.79, 95 % confidence interval 0.77–0.81). ER-positive status conferred a 6.15-fold higher likelihood of receiving AET compared to ER-negative status (95 % confidence interval 5.81–6.50). Women who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy were most likely to receive AET.

Conclusions

Receipt of AET is relatively low in the group of women most likely to benefit from its use, namely ER-positive patients who underwent BCS. Significant variation exists with respect to patient, tumor, site, and treatment factors. More tolerable drugs or clearer guideline recommendations may increase use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:52–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes LL, Wang M, Page DL, et al. Local excision alone without irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5319–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wehner P, Lagios MD, Silverstein MJ. DCIS treated with excision alone using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3175–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:478–88.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee LA, Silverstein MJ, Chung CT, et al. Breast cancer–specific mortality after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg. 2006;192:416–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falk RS, Hofvind S, Skaane P, Haldorsen T. Second events following ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a register-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129:929–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Pinder SE, et al. Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:21–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):1993–2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, Breast Cancer (Version 2.2013). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2014.

  10. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, et al. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2381–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ceilley E, Jagsi R, Goldberg S, Kachnic L, Powell S, Taghian A. The management of ductal carcinoma in situ in North America and Europe. Results of a survey. Cancer. 2004;101:1958–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Livaudais JC, Hwang ES, Karliner L, et al. Adjuvant hormonal therapy use among women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Womens Health. 2012;21:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakhlis F, Lazarus L, Hou N, et al. Tamoxifen use in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and T1a/b N0 invasive carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:688–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yen TWF, Kuerer HM, Ottesen RA, et al. Impact of randomized clinical trial results in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on the use of tamoxifen after breast surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3251–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hird RB, Chang A, Cimmino V, et al. Impact of estrogen receptor expression and other clinicopathologic features on tamoxifen use in ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2006;106:2113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Virnig BA, Torchia MT, Jarosek SL, Durham S, Tuttle TM. Use of endocrine therapy following diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ or early invasive breast cancer. Data Points 14. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schafer J. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin DB. Inference and missing data. Biometrika. 1976;63:581–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:940–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Allred DC, Anderson SJ, Paik S, et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces subsequent breast cancer in women with estrogen receptor–positive ductal carcinoma in situ: a study based on NSABP protocol B-24. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1268–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, et al. Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1041–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson LC, Camacho F, Levine EA, Anderson RT, Stewart JH. Patterns of care analysis among women with ductal carcinoma in situ in North Carolina. Am J Surg. 2008;195:164–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feigelson HS, Carroll NM, Weinmann S, et al. Treatment patterns for ductal carcinoma in situ from 2000–2010 across six integrated health plans. Springerplus. 2015;4:24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haque R, Achacoso NS, Fletcher SW, et al. Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ among patients cared for in large integrated health plans. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:351–60.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, Wickerham L, Paik SM. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). I. Intraductal carcinoma (DCIS). Cancer. 1986;57:197–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Solin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini FA, et al. Long-term outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 2005;103:1137–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Visvanathan K, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2942–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cuzick J, Powles T, Veronesi U, et al. Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9354):296–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 1998;351(9114):1451–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1652–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Javid SH, He H, Korde LA, Flum DR, Anderson BO. Predictors and outcomes of completion axillary node dissection among older breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2172–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Berry D, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:971–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB, Tuttle TM. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:443–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement. Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ, September 22–24, 2009. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:161–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Friese CR, Pini TM, Li Y, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy initiation and persistence in a diverse sample of patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:931–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

MRF was supported by a T32 grant support from the National Cancer Institute under award CA009168. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The data used in the study are derived from a deidentified NCDB file. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology used, or for the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigators.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan R. Flanagan MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flanagan, M.R., Rendi, M.H., Gadi, V.K. et al. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Retrospective Analysis from 2005 to 2012 in the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3264–3272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4668-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4668-z

Keywords

Navigation