Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to establish possible relationships among the metabolic and vascular characteristics of breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging.
Methods
Sixty-seven female patients with invasive ductal breast carcinoma (age 32–79 years) who underwent FDG PET/CT and DCE–MRI prior to cancer treatment were included in the study. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and heterogeneity factor (HF) were derived from FDG PET/CT. The DCE–MRI parameters K trans, K ep, and V e were obtained for all tumors, and relationships between the metabolic and perfusion parameters were sought via Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological and imaging parameters in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) was also evaluated.
Results
No significant correlation between perfusion and metabolic parameters (p > 0.05) was found, except between SUVmax and V e (p = 0.001, rho = −0.391). Recurrence developed in 12 of the 67 patients (17.9 %, follow-up period 8–41 months). Age (p = 0.016) and HF (p = 0.027) were significant independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) upon multivariate analysis. The RFS of patients under 40 years of age was significantly poorer than that of older patients (p < 0.001). Survival of patients with more heterogeneous tumors (HF less than −0.12) was poorer than those with relatively homogenous tumors (p = 0.033).
Conclusions
Tumors with higher levels of glucose metabolism (SUVmax values) exhibited higher tumor cellularities (V e values). Also, of the various metabolic and perfusion parameters available, tumor heterogeneity measured via FDG PET/CT (HF) may be useful in predicting RFS in breast cancer patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology. 2008;246:116–24.
Groheux D, Espie M, Giacchetti S, Hindie E. Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer. Radiology. 2013;266:388–405.
Tateishi U, Gamez C, Dawood S, Yeung HW, Cristofanilli M, Macapinlac HA. Bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer: morphologic and metabolic monitoring of response to systemic therapy with integrated PET/CT. Radiology. 2008;247:189–96.
Lee HY, Hyun SH, Lee KS, et al. Volume-based parameter of 18)F-FDG PET/CT in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prediction of therapeutic response and prognostic implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2787–94.
Guillem JG, Moore HG, Akhurst T, et al. Sequential preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment of response to preoperative chemoradiation: a means for determining longterm outcomes of rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:1–7.
van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, van Suylen RJ et al. Correlation of intra-tumour heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET with pathologic features in non-small cell lung cancer: a feasibility study. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87:55–8.
Kidd EA, Grigsby PW. Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity of cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5236–41.
Tixier F, Groves AM, Goh V, et al. Correlation of intra-tumor 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity indices with perfusion CT derived parameters in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99567.
Yankeelov TE, Gore JC. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, analysis, and examples. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2009;3:91–107.
Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223–32.
Semple SI, Gilbert FJ, Redpath TW, et al. The relationship between vascular and metabolic characteristics of primary breast tumours. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2038–45.
Brix G, Henze M, Knopp MV, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:2058–70.
Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3628–36.
Huang B, Chan T, Kwong DL, Chan WK, Khong PL. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: investigation of intratumoral heterogeneity with FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:169–74.
Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:91–101.
Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, et al. Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2127–32.
Knopp MV, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Choyke PL. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in oncology for diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:419–26.
Higashi T, Tamaki N, Torizuka T, et al. FDG uptake, GLUT-1 glucose transporter and cellularity in human pancreatic tumors. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1727–35.
Miller JC, Pien HH, Sahani D, Sorensen AG, Thrall JH. Imaging angiogenesis: applications and potential for drug development. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:172–87.
Assi HA, Khoury KE, Dbouk H, Khalil LE, Mouhieddine TH, El Saghir NS. Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5 Suppl 1:S2–8.
Soussan M, Orlhac F, Boubaya M, et al. Relationship between tumor heterogeneity measured on FDG-PET/CT and pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94017.
Cook GJ, Yip C, Siddique M, et al. Are pretreatment 18F-FDG PET tumor textural features in non-small cell lung cancer associated with response and survival after chemoradiotherapy? J Nucl Med. 2013;54:19–26.
Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:369–78.
Lu X, Kang Y. Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors: master regulators of metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5928–35.
Leek RD, Landers RJ, Harris AL, Lewis CE. Necrosis correlates with high vascular density and focal macrophage infiltration in invasive carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:991–5.
Jimenez RE, Wallis T, Visscher DW. Centrally necrotizing carcinomas of the breast: a distinct histologic subtype with aggressive clinical behavior. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:331–7.
Chicklore S, Goh V, Siddique M, Roy A, Marsden PK, Cook GJ. Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:133–40.
Acknowledgment
Jung-Dong Lee (Office of Biostatistics, Ajou University School of Medicine) kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.
Disclosures
All authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, T.H., Yoon, JK., Kang, D.K. et al. Correlation Between F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Metabolic Parameters and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Perfusion Data in Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3866–3872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4526-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4526-z