Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity Correlates with the Prognosis of Patients Who Have Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

  • Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The estimation of recurrence risk remains a critical issue in relation to gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with adjuvant therapy. The accuracy of the commonly used risk stratifications is not always adequate.

Methods

For this study, data were prospectively collected from 68 patients with GISTs who underwent R0 surgery between 2004 and 2009. The results from this analysis cohort were evaluated using the data obtained from an additional 40 patients in the validation cohort. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1)- and CDK2-specific activities were measured using a non-RI kinase assay system.

Results

The specific activities of CDK1 and CDK2, but not their expression, significantly correlated with recurrence. The specific activities of both CDK1 and CDK2 were independently correlated with mitosis and significantly correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). In the multivariate analysis, CDK2-specific activity (P = 0.0006), tumor size (P = 0.0347), and KIT deletion mutations (P = 0.0006) were significantly correlated with RFS in the analysis cohort. In the validation cohort, CDK2-specific activity (P = 0.0368) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrences with tumor location (P = 0.0442).

Conclusion

The results suggest that the specific activities of CDK1 and CDK2 may reflect the proliferative activity of GISTs and that CDK2-specific activity is a good prognostic factor predicting recurrence after macroscopic complete resection of GISTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet. 2013;382: 973–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Corless CL, Barnett CM, Heinrich MC. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: origin and molecular oncology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:865–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishida T, Doi T, Naito Y. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15:1979–1989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimaki J, Nishida T, Steigen SE, Brabec P, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:265–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schütte J, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeMatteo RP, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Demetri GD, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1097–104.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi T, Nakajima K, Nishitani A, Souma Y, Hirota S, Sawa Y, et al. An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gold JS, Gönen M, Gutiérrez A, Broto JM, García-del-Muro X, Smyrk TC, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gas-trointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1045–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi S, Miceli R, Messerini L, Bearzi I, Mazzoleni G, Capella C, et al. Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: a retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1646–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U, Oladeji O, Pink D, Ströbel P, Wardelmann E, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1854–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin-Broto J, Gutierrez A, Garcia-del-Muro X, Lopez-Guerrero JA, Martinez-Trufero J, de Sande LM, et al. Prognostic time dependence of deletions affecting codons 557 and/or 558 of KIT gene for relapse-free survival (RFS) in localized GIST: a Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS) Study. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1552–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wozniak A, Rutkowski P, Piskorz A, Ciwoniuk M, Osuch C, Bylina E, et al. Polish Clinical GIST Registry: prognostic value of KIT/PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): Polish Clinical GIST Registry experience. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, et al. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(Suppl 2):S1–41.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol.  2014;25(Suppl 3):iii21–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, Sugino Y, Minami M, Yamamura Y, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:416–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998;279:577–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirota S, Ohashi A, Nishida T, Isozaki K, Kinoshita K, Shinomura Y, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:660–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishihara H, Yoshida T, Kawasaki Y, Kobayashi H, Yamasaki M, Nakayama S, et al. A new cancer diagnostic system based on a CDK profiling technology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1741:226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim SJ, Nakayama S, Miyoshi Y, Taguchi T, Tamaki Y, Matsushima T, et al. Determination of the specific activity of CDK1 and CDK2 as a novel prognostic indicator for early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:68–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Corless CL, Ballman KV, Antonescu C, Kolesnikova V, Maki RG, Pisters PW, et al. Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1563–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reichardt P, Hartmann JT, Sundby K, et al. Response to imatinib rechallenge of GIST that recurs following completion of adjuvant imatinib treatment: the first analysis in the SSGXVIII/AIO trial patient population. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(Suppl 2):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haller F, Gunawan B, von Heydebreck A, Schwager S, Schulten HJ, Wolf-Salgó J, et al. Prognostic role of E2F1 and members of the CDKN2A network in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6589–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haller F, Löbke C, Ruschhaupt M, Cameron S, Schulten HJ, Schwager S, et al. Increased KIT signalling with upregulation of cyclin D correlates to accelerated proliferation and shorter disease-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with KIT exon 11 deletions. J Pathol. 2008;216:225–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmieder M, Wolf S, Danner B, Stoehr S, Juchems MS, Wuerl P, et al. p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome. Neoplasia. 2008;10:1154–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Romeo S, Debiec-Rychter M, Van Glabbeke M, Van Paassen H, Comite P, Van Eijk R, et al. Cell cycle/apoptosis molecule expression correlates with imatinib response in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4191–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lagarde P, Pérot G, Kauffmann A, Brulard C, Dapremont V, Hostein I, et al. Mitotic checkpoints and chromosome instability are strong predictors of clinical outcome in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:826–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hochegger H, Takeda S, Hunt T. Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: does one fit all? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:910–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Cell cycle, CDKs, and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:153–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was partly supported by the Sysmex Corporation (Kobe, Japan) and by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and by the National Cancer Centre Research and Development Fund.

Disclosure

Toshirou Nishida received grants from Novartis and Bayer, and honoraria from Pfizer, Bayer, and Novartis irrelevant to the submitted work. Sysmex Corporation (Kobe, Japan) was involved in the study design as well as measurement of CDK activities and their interpretation. Tomoko Matsushima, Yuko Kawasaki, and Satoshi Nakayama of Sysmex Corporation had analyzed activities of CDKs, and Tomoko Matsushima had access to the full raw data. Hideki Ishihara, previously affiliated with the Sysmex Corporation, was authorized for access to the primary raw data and performed the initial analysis of this study. Currently, Hideki Ishihara and Satoshi Nakayama are affiliated with the other companies, which have no relationship with the Sysmex Corporation. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshirou Nishida MD, PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10434_2015_4438_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 1 Patient selection in the analysis and validation cohorts (review only). Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 1115 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishida, T., Matsushima, T., Tsujimoto, M. et al. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity Correlates with the Prognosis of Patients Who Have Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3565–3573 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4438-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4438-y

Keywords

Navigation