Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Second Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Tumor Recurrence: Experience of the European Institute of Oncology

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed to determine the feasibility, accuracy, and recurrence rates of lymphoscintigraphy and the new sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences who were treated previously with conservative surgery and had negative SLNB results.

Methods

The study was conducted at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan and included 212 patients with the diagnosis of operable local breast cancer recurrence. They had been treated previously with conservative surgery and showed negative SLNB results. They subsequently underwent additional breast surgery and a second SLNB between May 2001 and December 2011.

Results

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated at least one new axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) in 207 patients (97.7 %), whereas no drainage was observed in five patients (2.3 %). One or more SLNs were surgically removed from 196 of the 207 patients. Isolation of SLNs from the remaining 11 patients could not be accomplished. The success rate for the SLNB was 92.5 %. Extra-axillary drainage pathways were visualized in 17 patients (8 %). The annual axillary recurrence rate after a median follow-up period of 48 months was 0.8 %, and the cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence at 5 years was 3.9 %.

Conclusions

A second SLNB should be considered for patients with operable local breast tumor recurrence who underwent conservative surgery and had negative SLNB results. The procedure is technically feasible and accurate for selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:546–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349:1864–1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:941–946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2028–2037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1365–1383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burger AE, Pain SJ, Peley G. Treatment of recurrent breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2013;19:310–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Intra M, Trifiro G, Galimberti V, et al. Second axillary lymph node biopsy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1216–1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:167–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Port ER, Garcia-Etienne CA, Park J, Fey J, Borgen PI, Cody HS III. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new frontier in the management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2209–2214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Ploeg IM, Oldenburg HS, Rutgers EJ, et al. Lymphatic drainage patterns from the treated breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1069–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox CE, Furman BT, Kiluk JV, et al. Use of reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur P, Kiluk JV, Meade T, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with previous ipsilateral complete axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:727–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Axelsson CK, Jonsson PE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in operations for recurrent breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:626–630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kothari MS, Rusby JE, Agusti AA, MacNeill FA. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous axillary surgery: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:8–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrenk P, Tausch C, Wayand W. Lymphatic mapping in patients with primary or recurrent breast cancer following previous axillary surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:851–856.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maaskant-Braat AJ, Roumen RM, Voogd AC, Pijpers R, Luiten EJ, Rutgers EJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Sentinel Node and Recurrent Breast Cancer (SNARB): results of a nationwide registration study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:620–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maaskant-Braat AJ, Voogd AC, Roumen RM, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Repeat sentinel node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson AV Jr, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow NE. The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics. 1978;34:541–554.

  20. Dinan D, Nagle E, Pettinga J. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in women with an ipsilateral second breast carcinoma and a history of breast and axillary surgery. Am J Surg. 2005;190:614–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Newman EA, Cimmino VM, Sabel MS, Diehl KM, Frey KA, Chang AE, Newman LA. Lymphatic mapping techniques and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87:353–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maaskant-Braat AJ, de Bruijn SZ, Woensdregt K, Pijpers H, Voogd AC, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Lymphatic mapping after previous breast surgery. Breast. 2012;21:444–448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boughey JC, Ross MI, Babeira GV, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery in locally recurrent breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;7:248–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano AE. Sentinel node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1099–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Intra MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Intra, M., Viale, G., Vila, J. et al. Second Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Tumor Recurrence: Experience of the European Institute of Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 2372–2377 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4282-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4282-5

Keywords

Navigation