Abstract
Purpose
This retrospective study aimed to determine the feasibility, accuracy, and recurrence rates of lymphoscintigraphy and the new sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences who were treated previously with conservative surgery and had negative SLNB results.
Methods
The study was conducted at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan and included 212 patients with the diagnosis of operable local breast cancer recurrence. They had been treated previously with conservative surgery and showed negative SLNB results. They subsequently underwent additional breast surgery and a second SLNB between May 2001 and December 2011.
Results
Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated at least one new axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) in 207 patients (97.7 %), whereas no drainage was observed in five patients (2.3 %). One or more SLNs were surgically removed from 196 of the 207 patients. Isolation of SLNs from the remaining 11 patients could not be accomplished. The success rate for the SLNB was 92.5 %. Extra-axillary drainage pathways were visualized in 17 patients (8 %). The annual axillary recurrence rate after a median follow-up period of 48 months was 0.8 %, and the cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence at 5 years was 3.9 %.
Conclusions
A second SLNB should be considered for patients with operable local breast tumor recurrence who underwent conservative surgery and had negative SLNB results. The procedure is technically feasible and accurate for selected patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:546–553.
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349:1864–1867.
Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:941–946.
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241.
Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2028–2037.
Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1365–1383.
Burger AE, Pain SJ, Peley G. Treatment of recurrent breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2013;19:310–318.
Intra M, Trifiro G, Galimberti V, et al. Second axillary lymph node biopsy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1216–1219.
Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:167–172.
Port ER, Garcia-Etienne CA, Park J, Fey J, Borgen PI, Cody HS III. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new frontier in the management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2209–2214.
van der Ploeg IM, Oldenburg HS, Rutgers EJ, et al. Lymphatic drainage patterns from the treated breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1069–1075.
Cox CE, Furman BT, Kiluk JV, et al. Use of reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:57–61.
Kaur P, Kiluk JV, Meade T, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with previous ipsilateral complete axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:727–732.
Axelsson CK, Jonsson PE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in operations for recurrent breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:626–630.
Kothari MS, Rusby JE, Agusti AA, MacNeill FA. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous axillary surgery: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:8–15.
Schrenk P, Tausch C, Wayand W. Lymphatic mapping in patients with primary or recurrent breast cancer following previous axillary surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:851–856.
Maaskant-Braat AJ, Roumen RM, Voogd AC, Pijpers R, Luiten EJ, Rutgers EJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Sentinel Node and Recurrent Breast Cancer (SNARB): results of a nationwide registration study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:620–626.
Maaskant-Braat AJ, Voogd AC, Roumen RM, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Repeat sentinel node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:13–20.
Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson AV Jr, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow NE. The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics. 1978;34:541–554.
Dinan D, Nagle E, Pettinga J. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in women with an ipsilateral second breast carcinoma and a history of breast and axillary surgery. Am J Surg. 2005;190:614–617.
Newman EA, Cimmino VM, Sabel MS, Diehl KM, Frey KA, Chang AE, Newman LA. Lymphatic mapping techniques and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87:353–364.
Maaskant-Braat AJ, de Bruijn SZ, Woensdregt K, Pijpers H, Voogd AC, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Lymphatic mapping after previous breast surgery. Breast. 2012;21:444–448.
Boughey JC, Ross MI, Babeira GV, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery in locally recurrent breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;7:248–253.
Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano AE. Sentinel node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1099–1104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Intra, M., Viale, G., Vila, J. et al. Second Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Tumor Recurrence: Experience of the European Institute of Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 2372–2377 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4282-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4282-5