Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In-transit Melanoma Metastases: Incidence, Prognosis, and the Role of Lymphadenectomy

Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze a large, single-institution database to further understanding of melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM) with regard to incidence, prognosis, and the role of lymphadenectomy.

Methods

A total of 11,614 patients with single primary cutaneous melanomas were treated at Melanoma Institute Australia between January 1994 and December 2009. Of these, 505 developed ITM. Clinicopathologic characteristics, sentinel node (SN) status, patterns of disease progression, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

In the 505 patients with ITM, the median primary tumor thickness was 2.95 mm, and 39.4 % were ulcerated. The ITM rates for patients with primary melanomas <1 or ≥1 mm in size and in those who underwent sentinel node biopsy were 0.4, 7.8, and 7.2 %, respectively. The ITM rates for SN-positive and SN-negative patients were 21.6 and 4.7 %, respectively. The median time from primary diagnosis to the development of ITM was 17.9 months. After ITM diagnosis, the median survival time was 19.9 months, 5-year survival was 32.8 %, and 10-year survival was 27.5 %. After ITM diagnosis, primary tumor site (head/neck, trunk) and ulceration were predictors of poorer survival. Five-year survival from the time of ITM ranged from 47.9 % for nonulcerated limb primary lesions to only 13.6 % for ulcerated trunk primary lesions. Elective lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with ITM did not significantly alter overall survival.

Conclusions

This large study demonstrates that the diagnosis of melanoma ITM carries serious adverse prognostic implications and will assist in improving the accuracy of staging and prognostic estimates as well as treatment in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Coit D, Ferrone C. Recurrent regional metastases of melanoma. In: Balch C, Houghton AN, Sober AJ, Soong SJ, Atkins MA, Thompson JF, eds. Cutaneous melanoma. 5th ed. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2009. p. 487–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gershenwald JE, Fidler IJ. Cancer. Targeting lymphatic metastasis. Science. 2002;296(5574):1811–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zbytek B, Carlson JA, Granese J, Ross J, Mihm MC Jr, Slominski A. Current concepts of metastasis in melanoma. Expert Rev Dermatol. 2008;3:569–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCarthy WH. Melanoma: margins for error—another view. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:304–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilmott J, Haydu L, Bagot M, et al. Angiotropism is an independent predictor of microscopic satellites in primary cutaneous melanoma. Histopathology. 2012;61:889–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heenan PJ, Ghaznawie M. The pathogenesis of local recurrence of melanoma at the primary excision site. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weide B, Faller C, Buttner P, et al. Prognostic factors of melanoma patients with satellite or in-transit metastasis at the time of stage III diagnosis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1307–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:599–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Poll D, Thompson JF, Colman MH, et al. A sentinel node biopsy does not increase the incidence of in-transit metastasis in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:597–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf IH, Richtig E, Kopera D, Kerl H. Locoregional cutaneous metastases of malignant melanoma and their management. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(2 Pt 2):244–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heenan PJ, English DR, Holman CD, Armstrong BK. The effects of surgical treatment on survival and local recurrence of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1992;69:421–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suojarvi NJ, Jahkola TA, Virolainen S, Ilmonen SK, Hernberg MM. Outcome following local recurrence or in-transit metastases in cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2012;22:447–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kretschmer L, Beckmann I, Thoms KM, Mitteldorf C, Bertsch HP, Neumann C. Factors predicting the risk of in-transit recurrence after sentinel lymphonodectomy in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pawlik TM, Ross MI, Johnson MM, et al. Predictors and natural history of in-transit melanoma after sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:587–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pawlik TM, Ross MI, Thompson JF, Eggermont AM, Gershenwald JE. The risk of in-transit melanoma metastasis depends on tumor biology and not the surgical approach to regional lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4588–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Veenstra HJ, van der Ploeg IM, Wouters MW, Kroon BB, Nieweg OE. Reevaluation of the locoregional recurrence rate in melanoma patients with a positive sentinel node compared to patients with palpable nodal involvement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Ross MI, et al. Factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:709–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karim RZ, Scolyer RA, Li W, et al. False negative sentinel lymph node biopsies in melanoma may result from deficiencies in nuclear medicine, surgery, or pathology. Ann Surg. 2008;247:1003–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veenstra HJ, Wouters MJ, Kroon BB, Olmos RA, Nieweg OE. Less false-negative sentinel node procedures in melanoma patients with experience and proper collaboration. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:454–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller MW, Vetto JT, Monroe MM, Weerasinghe R, Andersen PE, Gross ND. False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145:606–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yee VS, Thompson JF, McKinnon JG, et al. Outcome in 846 cutaneous melanoma patients from a single center after a negative sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beasley GM, Speicher P, Sharma K, et al. Efficacy of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients who develop recurrent melanoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:686–92.

  25. Thompson JF. Local and regional therapies for melanoma: many arrows in the quiver. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109:295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Espinosa E, Grob JJ, Dummer R, et al. Treatment algorithms in stage IV melanoma. Am J Ther. In press.

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Kaye Oakley for her assistance with the preparation of the article; we also gratefully acknowledge assistance from MIA colleagues. This study was supported by Melanoma Institute Australia, the Cancer Institute New South Wales, the National Health & Medical Research Council, and the Melanoma Foundation of the University of Sydney.

Disclosure

The author’s have no conflict of interest or financial disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Thompson MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Read, R.L., Haydu, L., Saw, R.P.M. et al. In-transit Melanoma Metastases: Incidence, Prognosis, and the Role of Lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 475–481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4100-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4100-0

Keywords

Navigation