Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

False-Positive Rate of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Presumed Solitary Metastatic Adrenal Disease in Patients with Known Malignancy

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) in cancer patients undergoing adrenalectomy for presumed metastatic disease, utilizing the gold standard of histopathology.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adrenalectomies for metastatic disease performed at our institution over the last 12 years. Preoperative PET scans were compared with final pathology reports. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for continuous variables.

Results

Forty-nine adrenalectomies were performed for metastatic disease. Thirty had preoperative PET imaging and were included in this analysis. Mean age was 65.5 ± 13.6 years (29–91) and 54 % were male. Mean size was 3.8 cm (0.4–7.1). Primary tumor distribution was 61 % (n = 17) pulmonary; 11 % (n = 3) breast; 7 % (n = 2) gastric; 7 % (n = 2) renal; and 4 % (n = 1) each of brain, lymphoma, melanoma, and uterine. Mean standardized uptake value (SUV) was 11 ± 7.3 (3.2–30.0). Final pathology revealed that 80 % (25/30) were positive for metastatic disease and 20 % (5/30) were negative. The positive predictive value of PET in correctly identifying adrenal metastatic disease was 83 % (24 true-positive cases and 5 false-positive cases); there was one false-negative PET. False-positive PET results were not correlated with sex (p = 0.35), age (p = 0.24), or maximum SUV units (p = 0.26).

Conclusions

The 20 % false-positive rate for PET-positive adrenalectomies performed for metastatic disease should warrant its inclusion in preoperative counseling to the patient and interaction with the treating oncologist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moreno P, De la Quintana B, Musholt T, et al. Adrenalectomy for solid tumor metises: results of a multicenter European study. Surgery 2013;154:1215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sarela A, Murphy I, Coit D, Conlon K. Metastasis to the adrenal gland: the emerging role of laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strong V, D’Angelica M, Tang L, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for isolated adrenal metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3392–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirayama T, Fujita T, Koguchi D et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastatic adrenal tumor. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7:43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boland G, Dwamena B, Jagtiani M, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology. 2011;259:117–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison J, Ali A, Bonomi P, Prinz R. The role of positron emission tomography in selecting patients with metastatic cancer for adrenalectomy. Am Surg. 2000;66:432–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erasmus JJ, Patz EF Jr, McAdams HP, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Metser U, Miller E, Lerman H, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of adrenal masses. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:32–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Okada M, Shimono T, Komeya Y, et al. Adrenal masses: the value of additional FDG-PET/CT in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:349–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mody M, Kazerooni E, Korobkin M. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses: immediate and delayed complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:434–439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma K, Venkatesan A, Swerdlow D, et al. Image-guided adrenal and renal biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;13:100–109.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Daniel Horwitz, MS, for his assistance with data retrieval.

Disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish Parikh MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuritzkes, B., Parikh, M., Melamed, J. et al. False-Positive Rate of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Presumed Solitary Metastatic Adrenal Disease in Patients with Known Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 437–440 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4031-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4031-9

Keywords

Navigation