Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Resection and Lymph Node Dissection in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer with Unresectable Metastasis: A Propensity Score Analysis in a Multicenter Retrospective Study

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Retrospective studies have shown that primary tumor resection improves the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis (mCRC). Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in mCRC has not been examined previously. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of primary tumor resection and LND in mCRC.

Methods

A total of 1,982 patients with mCRC from January 1997 to December 2007 were retrospectively studied. The impact of primary tumor resection and LND on overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score analysis to mitigate the selection bias. Covariates in the models for propensity scores included treatment period, institution, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, tumor location, histology, depth, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, and number of metastatic organs.

Results

In a multivariate analysis, primary tumor resection and treatment in the latter period were associated with an improved OS, and age over 70 years, female sex, lymph node metastasis, and multiple organ metastasis were associated with a decreased OS. In the propensity-matched cohort, patients treated with primary tumor resection showed a significantly better OS than those without tumor resection (median OS 13.8 vs. 6.3 months; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, among patients treated with primary tumor resection, patients treated with D3 LND showed a significantly better OS than those with less extensive LND (median OS 17.2 vs. 13.7 months; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

It was suggested that primary tumor resection with D3 LND improves the survival of patients with mCRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nitzkorski JR, Farma JM, Watson JC, et al. Outcome and natural history of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy without primary tumor resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):379–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2012;17(1):1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruo L, Gougoutas C, Paty PB, Guillem JG, Cohen AM, Wong WD. Elective bowel resection for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: prognostic variables for asymptomatic patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(5):722–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Verhoef C, de Wilt JH, Burger JW, Verheul HM, Koopman M. Surgery of the primary in stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47 Suppl 3:S61–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(4):354–364; discussion 364–355.

  6. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):272–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanehara S. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. 7th ed. Kanehara & co:Tokyo; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Koch R, Ludwig K. Factors predicting survival in stage IV colorectal carcinoma patients after palliative treatment: a multivariate analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2005;89(4):211–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grothey A, Sugrue MM, Purdie DM, et al. Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(33):5326–5334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(2):229–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–2342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee WS, Baek JH, Kang JM, Choi S, Kwon KA. The outcome after stent placement or surgery as the initial treatment for obstructive primary tumor in patients with stage IV colon cancer. Am J Surg. 2012;203(6):715–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sabbagh C, Browet F, Diouf M, et al. Is stenting as “a bridge to surgery” an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):107–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Venderbosch S, de Wilt JH, Teerenstra S, et al. Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3252–3260.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slanetz CA Jr, Grimson R. Effect of high and intermediate ligation on survival and recurrence rates following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(10):1205–1218;discussion 1218–1209.

  16. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):309–318;discussion 318–321.

  17. Battaglia A, Buzzonetti A, Baranello C, et al. Metastatic tumour cells favour the generation of a tolerogenic milieu in tumour draining lymph node in patients with early cervical cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58(9):1363–1373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng L, Zhang H, Luan Y, et al. Accumulation of foxp3+T regulatory cells in draining lymph nodes correlates with disease progression and immune suppression in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(16):4105–4112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boissonnas A, Scholer-Dahirel A, Simon-Blancal V, et al. Foxp3+T cells induce perforin-dependent dendritic cell death in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Immunity. 2010;32(2):266–278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stillwell AP, Buettner PG, Ho YH. Meta-analysis of survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer managed with surgical resection versus chemotherapy alone. World J Surg. 2010;34(4):797–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Ann Rev Public Health. 2000;21:121–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed S, Howel D, Debrah S. The influence of age on the outcome of treatment of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014;5(2):133–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Leersum NJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Wouters MW, et al. Increasing prevalence of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer in the South of the Netherlands 1995-2010. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(9):2157–2163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors completed this study in collaboration with the following: K. Hirata (Sapproro Medical University), A. Murata (Hirosaki University), K. Hatakeyama (Niigata University), K. Hase (National Defense Medical College), K. Kotake (Tochighi Cancer Center), T. Watanabe (University of Tokyo), T. Masaki (Kyorin University), S. Kameoka (Tokyo Women’s Medical University), H. Hasegawa (Keio University), K. Takahashi (Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center), H. Yano (International Medical Center of Japan), K. Sugihara (Tokyo Medical and Dental University), Y. Hashiguchi (Teikyo University), K. Maeda (Fujita Health University), K. Komori (Aichi Cancer Center), Y. Sakai (Kyoto University), and K. Shirouzu (Kurume University).

Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Watanabe MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishihara, S., Hayama, T., Yamada, H. et al. Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Resection and Lymph Node Dissection in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer with Unresectable Metastasis: A Propensity Score Analysis in a Multicenter Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2949–2955 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3719-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3719-1

Keywords

Navigation