Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Gastric Cancer Different in Korea and the United States? Impact of Tumor Location on Prognosis

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the characteristics and prognoses of gastric cancers by tumor location in Korean and U.S. subjects after curative-intent (R0) resection for gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

Data were collected for all patients who had undergone R0 resection at one U.S. institution (n = 567) and one South Korean institution (n = 1,620). Patients with gastroesophageal junction tumors or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Patient, surgical, and pathologic variables were compared by tumor location. Factors associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined via multivariate analysis.

Results

In the Korean cohort, significantly more upper third GC (UTG) patients had undifferentiated, diffuse type, and advanced stage cancers compared to lower third GC (LTG) and middle third GC (MTG) patients. In the U.S. cohort, however, T stage was relatively evenly distributed among UTG, MTG, and LTG patients. The independent predictors of DSS in the Korean cohort were T stage, tumor size, retrieved and positive lymph node counts, and age, but in the U.S. cohort, the only independent predictors were T stage and positive lymph node count. Tumor size significantly affected DSS of Korean UTG patients but not U.S. UTG patients.

Conclusions

There were significant differences in tumor characteristics by tumor location within and between both national cohorts. On the basis of these findings, further study to investigate the biological difference between the two countries is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW, Fraumeni JF Jr. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA. 1991;265:1287–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow WH, Blot WJ, Vaughan TL, Risch HA, Gammon MD, Stanford JL, et al. Body mass index and risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:150–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pera M, Cameron AJ, Trastek VF, Carpenter HA, Zinsmeister AR. Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:510–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blaser MJ, Saito D. Trends in reported adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in Japan. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Wu J, Ren D, Yan X, et al. A rising trend of gastric cardia cancer in Gansu Province of China. Cancer Lett. 2008;269:18–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. An JY, Baik YH, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Bae JM, et al. The prognosis of gastric cardia cancer after R0 resection. Am J Surg. 2010;199:725–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park CH, Song KY, Kim SN. Treatment results for gastric cancer surgery: 12 years’ experience at a single institute in Korea. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, Jacks LM, Gonen M, Shah M, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg. 2010;251:640–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kattan MW, Karpeh MS, Mazumdar M, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peeters KC, Kattan MW, Hartgrink HH, Kranenbarg EK, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF, et al. Validation of a nomogram for predicting disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:702–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koc M, Dizen H, Ozalp N, Keskek M, Karakose N, Tez M. External validation of a US-derived nomogram that predicts individual survival after gastric cancer resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:755–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Theuer CP. Asian gastric cancer patients at a southern California comprehensive cancer center are diagnosed with less advanced disease and have superior stage-stratified survival. Am Surg. 2000;66:821–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hundahl SA, Stemmermann GN, Oishi A. Racial factors cannot explain superior Japanese outcomes in stomach cancer. Arch Surg. 1996;131:170–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bunt AM, Hermans J, Smit VT, van de Velde CJ, Fleuren GJ, Bruijn JA. Surgical/pathologic-stage migration confounds comparisons of gastric cancer survival rates between Japan and Western countries. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:19–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Piso P, Werner U, Lang H, Mirena P, Klempnauer J. Proximal versus distal gastric carcinoma—what are the differences? Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:520–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono H, et al. Surgical outcomes for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maeda H, Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Sugimoto T, Namikawa T, Dabanaka K, et al. Clinicopathologic features of adenocarcinoma at the gastric cardia: is it different from distal cancer of the stomach? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:306–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McColl KE. Cancer of the gastric cardia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:687–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. World Health Organization classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yokoi C, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H, Oda I. Endoscopic submucosal dissection allows curative resection of locally recurrent early gastric cancer after prior endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyo Young Song MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shim, J.H., Song, K.Y., Jeon, H.M. et al. Is Gastric Cancer Different in Korea and the United States? Impact of Tumor Location on Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2332–2339 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3608-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3608-7

Keywords

Navigation