Skip to main content

Long-Term Clinical and Functional Results of Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer

Annals of Surgical Oncology volume 21, pages 422–428 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is an alternative to abdominoperineal resection (APR) for super-low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term curability after ISR over an average 6-year observational period, to compare the postoperative functional outcomes for ISR with those for low anterior resection (LAR), and to determine whether ISR is a function-preserving surgery.

Methods

Between 2000 and 2007, a total of 77 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent curative ISR. The curability outcomes for ISR, LAR, and APR were compared. We evaluated the postoperative defecation functions, Wexner incontinence score (WIS), and defecation quality of life (QOL) for a between-groups comparison (ISR/LAR).

Results

The 5-year survival rate after ISR was 76.4 %, and the outcome was better than for APR (APR 51.2 %, LAR 80.7 %). Local recurrence after ISR occurred in 7.8 % of patients (APR 12.1 %, LAR 11.7 %). The average daily frequency of defecation was 3.7 times for the ISR patients and 3.2 times for the LAR patients, indicating no significant difference between the groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences between the groups for defecation functions. The WIS was 8.1 for ISR and 4.9 for LAR, and the defecation QOL for ISR and LAR was not significantly different (modified fecal incontinence QOL score: ISR 34.3, LAR 26.5).

Conclusions

The long-term clinical and functional results suggest that ISR may be the optimal sphincter-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancers who cannot be treated with a double-stapling technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Parks AG, Percy JP. Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1982;69:301–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1972;65:975–6.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M. Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:S43–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection; histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986;38:996–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls RJ, Hall C. Treatment of non-disseminated cancer of the lower rectum. Br J Surg. 1996;83:15–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau G, et al. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1992;163:407–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1168–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, et al. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:843–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1065–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1858–67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, et al. Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2007;94:341–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246:916–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, et al. Incidence and patterns of recurrence after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:642–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, et al. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2009;33:1750–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiser MR, Quah HM, Shia J, et al. Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection. Ann Surg. 2009;249:236–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tiret E, Poupardin B, McNamara D, et al. Ultralow anterior resection with intersphincteric dissection: what is the limit of safe sphincter preservation? Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:454–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:459–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, et al. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:832–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K, et al. Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:S13–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, et al. Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1272–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M, et al. Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:64–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollett WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1983;198:159–63.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, et al. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg. 2005;241:465–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;28:1479–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Akasu T, et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation for patients with rectal carcinoma: oncologic and functional outcome. Cancer 1996;78:1871–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mori T, Takahashi K, Yasuno M. Radical resection with autonomic nerve preservation and lymph node dissection techniques in lower rectal cancer surgery and its results: the impact of lateral lymph node dissection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:409–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K, et al. Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:986–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fürst A, Suttner S, Agha A, et al. Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1161–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hashimoto H, Shiokawa H, Funahashi K, et al. Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:928–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihl E, et al. Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients. Br J Surg. 1985;72:34–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rullier E, Laurent C, Carles J, et al. Local recurrence of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal and anterior resection. Br J Surg. 1997;84:525–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, et al.; Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:48–58.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, et al. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1994;219:365–73.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Takase Y, Oya M, Komatsu J. Clinical and functional comparison between stapled colonic J-pouch low rectal anastomosis and hand-sewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for very low rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2002;32:315–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, et al. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch: anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1434–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA, et al. Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1449–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study received no financial support. We thank the Department of Pathology staff at our institute for performing the pathologic investigations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan

    Motoi Koyama MD, Akihiro Murata MD, Yoshiyuki Sakamoto MD, Hajime Morohashi MD, Seiji Takahashi MD, Eri Yoshida MD & Kenichi Hakamada MD

Authors
  1. Motoi Koyama MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akihiro Murata MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshiyuki Sakamoto MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hajime Morohashi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seiji Takahashi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eri Yoshida MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kenichi Hakamada MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motoi Koyama MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koyama, M., Murata, A., Sakamoto, Y. et al. Long-Term Clinical and Functional Results of Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 422–428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3573-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3573-1

Keywords

  • Lower Rectal Cancer
  • Staple Anastomosis
  • Wexner Score
  • Intersphincteric Resection
  • Wexner Incontinence Score