Skip to main content

Elevated Preoperative Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict Poor Outcome in Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma

ABSTRACT

Background

Systemic inflammation has been implicated in cancer development and progression. This study sought to determine whether systemic inflammatory markers can predict postoperative outcome in soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods

A total of 162 cases of primary, localized STS were reviewed. Patients with evidence of infectious or inflammatory diseases were excluded. The mean follow-up period was 46.7 months. The level of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) measured before surgery were evaluated for association with disease-specific survival and local recurrence.

Results

The mean values of CRP, ESR, and NLR were 0.79 mg/dL, 18.8 mm/h, and 2.12, respectively. Cutoff values derived from receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis were 0.20 mg/dL for CRP, 10.0 mm/h for ESR, and 2.50 for NLR. On univariate analysis, all inflammatory markers were associated with disease-specific survival (CRP: P = 0.007; ESR: P = 0.022; NLR: P = 0.030). On multivariate analysis, the CRP level (P = 0.019) and ESR (P = 0.013) remained significant. Elevation of multiple markers was a more significant prognostic factor than elevation of a single marker (P = 0.001). However, none of the inflammatory markers was associated with local recurrence (CRP: P = 0.345; ESR: P = 0.271; NLR: P = 0.570). Histologic grade was strongly correlated with inflammatory marker values (NLR: P < 0.001; ESR: P = 0.002; CRP: P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Preoperative systemic inflammatory status, assessed by using multiple serum markers, predicted disease-specific survival in STS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2

REFERENCES

  1. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Idowu OK, Ding Q, Taktak AF, Chandrasekar CR, Yin Q. Clinical implication of pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in soft tissue sarcoma. Biomarkers. 2012;17:539–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakamura T, Matsumine A, Matsubara T, Asanuma K, Uchida A, Sudo A. Clinical significance of pretreatment serum C-reactive protein level in soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2012;118:1055–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce BL, Ballard-Barbash R, Bernstein L, et al. Elevated biomarkers of inflammation are associated with reduced survival among breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3437–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, McMillan DC. The longitudinal relationship between circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in patients undergoing resection for renal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1076–80.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Future Oncol. 2010;6:149–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alifano M, Falcoz PE, Seegers V, et al. Preresection serum C-reactive protein measurement and survival among patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:1161–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karakiewicz PI, Hutterer GC, Trinh QD, et al. C-reactive protein is an informative predictor of renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality: a European study of 313 patients. Cancer. 2007;110:1241–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Z, Malhotra PS, Thomas GR, et al. Expression of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:1369–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henry-Amar M, Friedman S, Hayat M, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate predicts early relapse and survival in early-stage Hodgkin disease. The EORTC Lymphoma Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:361–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sengupta S, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, et al. The preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate is an independent prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:304–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chua W, Charles KA, Baracos VE, Clarke SJ. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1288–95.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kattan MW, Leung DH, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific death. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:791–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maki RG, Moraco N, Antonescu CR, et al. Toward better soft tissue sarcoma staging: building on American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems versions 6 and 7. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3377–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Germano G, Frapolli R, Simone M, et al. Antitumor and anti-inflammatory effects of trabectedin on human myxoid liposarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2235–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colombet I, Pouchot J, Kronz V, et al. Agreement between erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in hospital practice. Am J Med. 2010;123:863.e7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults: study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984;33:37–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts: rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001;102:5–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beltran J, Simon DC, Katz W, Weis LD. Increased MR signal intensity in skeletal muscle adjacent to malignant tumors: pathologic correlation and clinical relevance. Radiology. 1987;162:251–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanna SL, Fletcher BD, Parham DM, Bugg MF. Muscle edema in musculoskeletal tumors: MR imaging characteristics and clinical significance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:441–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kroon HM, Bloem JL, Holscher HC, van der Woude HJ, Reijnierse M, Taminiau AH. MR imaging of edema accompanying benign and malignant bone tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1994;23:261–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steen RG. Edema and tumor perfusion: characterization by quantitative 1H MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:259–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. White LM, Wunder JS, Bell RS, et al. Histologic assessment of peritumoral edema in soft tissue sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:1439–45.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rutkowski P, Kaminska J, Kowalska M, Ruka W, Steffen J. Cytokine serum levels in soft tissue sarcoma patients: correlations with clinico-pathological features and prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2002;100:463–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costenbader KH, Chibnik LB, Schur PH. Discordance between erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein measurements: clinical significance. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:746–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buess T, Ludwig C. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in comparison with erythrocyte sedimentation as routine admission diagnostic test [in German]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995;125:120–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dinant GJ, de Kock CA, van Wersch JW. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein measurement does not justify replacement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in daily general practice. Eur J Clin Invest. 1995;25:353–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suh CH, Chun HY, Ye YM, Park HS. Unresponsiveness of C-reactive protein in the non-infectious inflammation of systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with interleukin 6. Clin Immunol. 2006;119:291–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006;441:431–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayyoub M, Taub RN, Keohan ML, et al. The frequent expression of cancer/testis antigens provides opportunities for immunotherapeutic targeting of sarcoma. Cancer Immun. 2004;4:7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee SY, Obata Y, Yoshida M, et al. Immunomic analysis of human sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2651–6.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maki RG. Soft tissue sarcoma as a model disease to examine cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001;13:270–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Szkandera J, Absenger G, Liegl-Atzwanger B, et al. Elevated preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor prognosis in soft-tissue sarcoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1677–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

DISCLOSURE

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest or financial support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkyu Han MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, ES., Kim, HS. & Han, I. Elevated Preoperative Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict Poor Outcome in Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 778–785 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3418-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3418-3

Keywords

  • Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
  • Inflammatory Marker
  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma
  • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma
  • Trabectedin