Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Factors Associated with Breast Lymphedema

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The development of breast lymphedema (BLE) after breast/axillary surgery is poorly characterized. We prospectively evaluated clinical and surgical factors associated with development of BLE.

Methods

Patients undergoing unilateral breast-conserving surgery were prospectively enrolled preoperatively and followed for development of BLE. To augment the number of patients with BLE for evaluation of risk factors, postoperative patients identified in the clinic with signs and symptoms of BLE were also enrolled. Logistic regression with Firth’s penalized likelihood bias-reduction method was used for univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Of 144 women, 124 were enrolled preoperatively (38 of whom developed BLE), and 20 women with BLE were enrolled postoperatively. Any type of axillary surgery was the strongest factor associated with BLE (odds ratio, 134; 95 % confidence interval, 18 to >1,000). All 58 BLE events occurred in women with axillary surgery as compared with no events in the 46 patients without axillary surgery (p < 0.0001). Among 98 women who underwent axillary surgery, BLE did not occur more often after axillary lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (p = 0.38) and was not associated with total number of nodes removed (p = 0.52). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with the development of BLE in the axillary surgery subgroup included baseline BMI (p = 0.004), incision location (p = 0.009), and prior surgical biopsy (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Risk of BLE is primarily related to performance of any axillary surgery but not the extent of axillary surgery or number of lymph nodes removed. Other factors associated with BLE were increased body mass index, incision location, and prior surgical excisional biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petrek JA, Senie RT, Peters M, Rosen PP. Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis. Cancer. 2001;92:1368–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke D, Martinez A, Cox RS, Goffinet DR. Breast edema following staging axillary node dissection in patients with breast carcinoma treated by radical radiotherapy. Cancer. 1982;49:2295–2299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronka RH, Pamilo MS, von Smitten KA, Leidenius MH. Breast lymphedema after breast conserving treatment. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:551–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Degnim AC, Miller J, Hoskin TL, et al. A prospective study of breast lymphedema: frequency, symptoms, and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:915–922.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80:27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ploner M, Dunkler D, Southworth H, Heinze G. logistf: Firth’s bias reduced logistic regression. R package version 1.10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=logistf (2010).

  7. Loprinzi CL, Okuno S, Pisansky TM, Sterioff S, Gaffey TA, Morton RF. Postsurgical changes of the breast that mimic inflammatory breast carcinoma. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1996;71:552–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Staren ED, Klepac S, Smith AP, et al. The dilemma of delayed cellulitis after breast conservation therapy. Arch Surg. 1996;131:651–654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baddour LM. Breast cellulitis complicating breast conservation therapy. J Intern Med. 1999;245:5–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD, et al. Special report: consensus conference III—image-detected breast cancer. State-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:504–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA Jr, Soo MS, Bentley RC, Seigler HF. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg. 2001;233:769–777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The American Society of Breast Surgeons. Percutaneous needle biopsy for image detected breast abnormalities. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/statements/PDF_Statements/Percutaneous_Needle_Biopsy.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2013.

  13. McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5213–5219.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sener SF, Winchester DJ, Martz CH, et al. Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:748–752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zippel D, Siegelmann-Danieli N, Ayalon S, Kaufman B, Pfeffer R, Zvi Papa M. Delayed breast cellulitis following breast conserving operation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:327–330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goffman TE, Laronga C, Wilson L, Elkins D. Lymphedema of the arm and breast in irradiated breast cancer patients: risks in an era of dramatically changing axillary surgery. Breast J. 2004;10:405–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Senofsky GM, Moffat FL Jr, Davis K, et al. Total axillary lymphadenectomy in the management of breast cancer. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1336–41, discussion 1341–1342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication was made possible by the Mayo Clinic CTSA through Grant UL1RR024150 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Amy C. Degnim was also supported for this project by the CA90628-08 Paul Calabresi Award for Clinical-Translational Research (K12) via the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center. We also thank the women who volunteered in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy C. Degnim MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boughey, J.C., Hoskin, T.L., Cheville, A.L. et al. Risk Factors Associated with Breast Lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 1202–1208 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3408-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3408-5

Keywords

Navigation