Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genitourinary Resection at the Time of Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Is Not Associated with Increased Morbidity or Worsened Oncologic Outcomes: A Case-matched Study

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has gained acceptance in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with reported morbidity and mortality rates of 27–56 and 0–11 %, respectively. The safety and oncologic outcome of genitourinary repair at the time of CRS and HIPEC remains unclear.

Methods

We identified 170 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC at our institution between July 2007 and August 2011 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Thirty-four (20 %) underwent concomitant urologic reconstruction at the time of CRS-HIPEC and were matched by disease burden (intraoperative peritoneal cancer index [PCI]) and extent of surgery (ΔPCI) with a cohort of 38 (22.3 %) subjects without genitourinary involvement. The primary end points considered for this analysis included the development of major surgical (Clavien–Dindo Class III–V) complications and overall survival.

Results

Median follow-up was 9.4 months. The most commonly performed urologic interventions included partial cystectomy with primary repair in 23 (65.7 %) and segmental ureteral resection and repair in 11 (31.4 %). Patients with genitourinary reconstruction had more total organ involvement (6.5 vs. 4.3, p < 0.001) and more commonly underwent enteric anastomoses (82.4 vs. 57.9 %, p = 0.025). No significant differences were observed with regard to major morbidity, need for transfusion, operative time, intensive care unit admission, or length of stay. Among patients with appendiceal or colonic tumors (n = 46), overall survival was similar between genitourinary reconstruction and matched cohorts: 22.5 versus 15.1 months, respectively (p = 0.66).

Conclusions

Genitourinary reconstruction at the time of CRS-HIPEC occurs more commonly in patients with extensive disease burden undergoing radical debulking, yet does not adversely influence surgical morbidity or survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Franko J, Ibrahim Z, Gusani NJ, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion versus systemic chemotherapy alone for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer. 2010;116:3756–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verwaal VJ. Long-term results of cytoreduction and HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy. Cancer J. 2009;15:212–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugarbaker PH. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy for selected patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: a new standard of care or an experimental approach? Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:309417.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugarbaker PH. Cytoreductive surgery and peri-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a curative approach to pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brücher BL, Piso P, Verwaal V. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC—overview and basics. Cancer Invest. 2012;30:209–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohamed F, Moran BJ. Morbidity and mortality with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The importance of a learning curve. Cancer J. 2009;15:196–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Honoré C, Souadka A, Goéré D, et al. HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis: does an associated urologic procedure increase morbidity? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner PL, Austin F, Maduekwe U, et al. Extensive cytoreductive surgery for appendiceal carcinomatosis: morbidity, mortality, and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1056–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verwaal VJ, Bruin S, Boot H, van Slooten G, van Tinteren H. 8-year follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2426–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roviello F, Caruso S, Marrelli D. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:e38–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. St Lezin MA, Stoller ML. Surgical ureteral injuries. Urology. 1991;38:497–506.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ang C, Naik R. The value of ureteric stents in debulking surgery for disseminated ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:978–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schimpf MO, Gottenger EE, Wagner JR. Universal ureteral stent placement at hysterectomy to identify ureteral injury: a decision analysis. BJOG. 2008;115:1151–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bothwell WN, Bleicher RJ, Dent TL. Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in colon surgery. A five-year review. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:330–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coccolini F, Lotti M, Manfredi R et al. Ureteral stenting in cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a routine procedure: evidence and necessity. Urol Int. 2012;89:307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pokala N, Delaney CP, Kiran RP et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous intra-operative vs sequential prophylactic ureteric catheter insertion in re-operative and complicated colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:683–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander HR, Hanna N, Pingpank JF. Clinical results of cytoreduction and HIPEC for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Cancer Treat Res. 2007;134:343–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krane LS, Kader AK, Levin EA. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritonela carcinomatosis secondary to urachal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:258–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smeenk RM, Bex A, Verwaal VJ, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei and the urinary tract: involvement and treatment related complications. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:20–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parissa Tabrizian MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leapman, M.S., Jibara, G., Tabrizian, P. et al. Genitourinary Resection at the Time of Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Is Not Associated with Increased Morbidity or Worsened Oncologic Outcomes: A Case-matched Study. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 1153–1158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3393-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3393-8

Keywords

Navigation