Skip to main content
Log in

Multicenter Study to Assess Endoscopic Resection of 159 Sinonasal Adenocarcinomas

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and morbidity of the endoscopic endonasal approach for the treatment of sinonasal adenocarcinomas.

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicenter study of nine French tertiary referral centers, including untreated patients. All patients were operated by an endoscopic approach. Tumors were classified according to the UICC 2002. Demographic, therapeutic, histological, morbidity data, and the course of the disease were recorded. Survival rates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 159 patients were included with a mean age of 69 years. There were 19T1, 62T2 (1M1), 36T3 (1N1), 26T4a, and 16T4b (1N2a-1N2c). The mean duration of hospitalization was 4.4 days. The histologic outcomes showed that the olfactory cleft, the posterior and anterior ethmoid sinus, and the sphenoid, maxillary, and frontal sinuses were invaded in 95, 64, 55, 19, 7, and 3 % of cases, respectively. Histologic margins were positive in 17 % (1T1, 4T2, 3T3, 2T4a, and 8T4b). In total, 130 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy on the primary tumor site (58 Gy), 24 cases were not irradiated, and 5 refused treatment. The mean follow-up was 32.5 ± 24 months. The complication rate was 19 %: 6 epistaxis, 3 meningitis, 6 CSF leaks, 2 dacryocystitis, and 8 septoplasties. The recurrence rate was 17.6 % (28 cases) within 23 ± 21 months. Eleven patients underwent a second surgical procedure. Nine patients died of their disease (3T2, 2T3, 4T4b). The global and disease-specific, recurrence-free survival rate at 3 years was 74 and 84 % respectively.

Conclusions

The endoscopic approach seems to be efficient to remove sinonasal adenocarcinoma with low morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choussy O, Ferron C, Vedrine PO, et al. Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of nasoethmoidal adenocarcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:143–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choussy O, Ferron C, Vedrine PO, et al. Adenocarcinoma of Ethmoid: a GETTEC retrospective multicenter study of 418 cases. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:437–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Gabory L, Maunoury A, Maurice-Tison S, Abdulkhaleq MH, Darrouzet V, Bebear JP, Stoll D, et al. Long-term single-center results of management of ethmoid adenocarcinoma: 95 patients over 28 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lund VJ, Chisholm EJ, Takes RP, et al. Evidence for treatment strategies in sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:1168–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carta F, Kania R, Sauvaget E, Bresson D, George B, Herman P. Endoscopy skull-base resection for ethmoid adenocarcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma. Rhinology. 2011;49:74–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanna E, DeMonte F, Ibrahim S, Roberts D, Levine N, Kupferman M. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers with and without craniotomy: oncologic results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135:1219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lund V, Howard DJ, Wei WI. Endoscopic resection of malignant tumors of the nose and sinuses. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vergez S, Nadeau SH, Percodani J, Pessey JJ, Serrano E. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130:255–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, et al. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl. 2010(22):1–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen MA, Liang J, Cohen IJ, Grady MS, O’Malley BW Jr, Newman JG. Endoscopic resection of advanced anterior skull base lesions: oncologically safe? ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71:123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Gerven L, Jorissen M, Nuyts S, Hermans R, Vander Poorten V. Long-term follow-up of 44 patients with adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and sinuses primarily treated with endoscopic resection followed by radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2011;33:898–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. UICC. Paranasal sinus. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.

  13. French Guidelines for sino-nasal malignant tumors. French expert web of rare ENT cancers. www.orlfrance.org/refcor/RefcorSINUS.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2013.

  14. Nicolai P, Villaret AB, Bottazzoli M, Rossi E, Valsecchi MG. Ethmoid adenocarcinoma from craniofacial to endoscopic resections: a single institution experience over 25 years. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(2):330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolai P, Battaglia P, Bignami M, et al. Endoscopic surgery for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base: a 10-year experience. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22:308–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goffart Y, Jorissen M, Daele J, et al. Minimally invasive endoscopic management of malignant sinonasal tumours. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2000;54(2):221–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jankowski R, Georgel T, Vignaud JM, et al. Endoscopic surgery reveals that woodworkers’ adenocarcinomas originate in the olfactory cleft. Rhinology. 2007;45:308–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Gabory L, Darrouzet V, Stoll D. Morbidity assessment of degloving after sino-nasal tumor treatment: à propos of 170 cases. In Rapport du XXXVIIIeme French Head Neck Surgery Society Congress, Ed. EDK, Paris 2006. p. 179–89.

  19. Vergez S, Martin-Dupont N, Lepage B, De Bonnecaze G, Decotte A, Serrano E. Endoscopic vs. transfacial resection of sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146:848–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B, Kraus DH, Bridger PG, Cantu G, et al. Complications of craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the skull base: report of an International Collaborative Study. Head Neck. 2005;27:445–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B, Kraus DH, Bridger PG, Cantu G, et al. Craniofacial resection for malignant paranasal sinus tumors: Report of an International Collaborative Study. Head Neck. 2005;27:575–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernard P, Biller H, Lawson W, LeBenger J. Complications following rhinotomy. Review of 148 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989;98(9):684–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mertz JS, Pearson BW, Kern EB. Lateral rhinotomy. Indications, technique, and review of 226 patients. Arch Otolaryngol. 1983;109(4):235–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Ray Cooke for linguistic assistance and Dr Antoine Benard for statistic analysis.

Financial support and conflict of interest

The authors have received no financial support and have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludovic de Gabory MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vergez, S., du Mayne, M.D., Coste, A. et al. Multicenter Study to Assess Endoscopic Resection of 159 Sinonasal Adenocarcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 1384–1390 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3385-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3385-8

Keywords

Navigation