Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cervical Lymph Node Dissection for Clinically Submucosal Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purposes of this study were to clarify the risk factors for supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis and the survival benefit from cervical lymph node (LN) dissections in patients with clinically submucosal (cT1b) carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

Methods

A total of 86 patients with this disease who underwent esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify the independent risk factors for SCLN metastasis and prognostic factors, respectively. An index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at nodal basin and the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with metastasis at that basin were used to assess the therapeutic outcomes.

Results

A total of 40 patients (47 %) were found to have pathological LN metastasis. Also, 13 patients (15 %) had cervical LN metastasis: 6 and 7 with carcinoma of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus, respectively. SCLN metastasis was found in 6 patients (7 %); however, there was no independent risk factor for SCLN metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate was 72.5 %. Cervical LN metastasis was an independent prognostic factor (p = .04; odds ratio 2.55; 95 % confidence interval 1.03–6.31); however, there was no significant difference in survival between patients with SCLN metastasis and those without (p = .06). The calculated index of estimated benefit from cervical LN dissections was 6.9, following upper mediastinal LN of 15.6 and perigastric LN of 8.3.

Conclusions

We could not identify risk factors to predict SCLN metastasis. Cervical LN dissection should not be omitted in patients with cT1b carcinoma, especially of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381:400–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Obinata I, Komukai S, Hatakeyama K. Extended radical esophagectomy for superficially invasive carcinoma of the esophagus. Surgery. 1999;125:142–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Igaki H, Kato H, Tachimori Y, Daiko H, Fukaya M, Yajima S, Nakanishi Y. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with clinical Stage I squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grotenhuis BA, van Heijl M, Zehetner J, Moons J, Wijnhoven BP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer: extended or regional lymphadenectomy? Ann Surg. 2010;252:823–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Suzuki S, Kuwabara S, Hatakeyama K. Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:306–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 10th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yamashita H, Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T. Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011;254:274–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tabira Y, Yasunaga M, Tanaka M, Nakano K, Sakaguchi T, Nagamoto N, et al. Recurrent nerve nodal involvement is associated with cervical nodal metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:232–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li B, Chen H, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Li C, Hu H, et al. Pattern of lymphatic spread in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-institution experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuge K, Murakami G, Mizobuchi S, Hata Y, Aikou T, Sasaguri S. Submucosal territory of the direct lymphatic drainage system to the thoracic duct in the human esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:1343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizutani M, Murakami G, Nawata S, Hitrai I, Kimura Y. Anatomy of right recurrent nerve node: why does early metastasis of esophageal cancer occur in it? Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tachimori Y, Nagai Y, Kanamori N, Hokamura N, Igaki H. Pattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage system. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:33–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nathanson SD. Insights into the mechanisms of lymph node metastasis. Cancer. 2003;98:413–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakagawa S, Nishimaki T, Kosugi S, Ohashi M, Kanda T, Hatakeyama K. Cervical lymphadenectomy is beneficial for patients with carcinoma of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada H, Okazumi S, Matsubara H, Nabeya Y, Shiratori T, Shimizu T, et al. Impact of the number and extent of positive lymph nodes in 200 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after three-field lymph node dissection. World J Surg. 2006;30:1441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2004. Chiba: The Japan Esophageal Society, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

No commercial interest and financial or material support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-ichi Kosugi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosugi, Si., Kawaguchi, Y., Kanda, T. et al. Cervical Lymph Node Dissection for Clinically Submucosal Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 4016–4021 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0

Keywords

Navigation