Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and S-1 for Resectable and Borderline Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results from a Prospective Multi-institutional Phase 2 Trial

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. First-line treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is associated with promising antitumor activity with a high response rate. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of GS in the neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

In a multi-institutional single-arm phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine and S-1, repeated every 21 days, was administered for two cycles (NAC-GS) to patients with resectable and borderline PDAC. The primary end point was the 2-year survival rate. Secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, pathological effect, recurrence-free survival, and tumor marker status.

Results

Of 36 patients enrolled, 35 were eligible for this clinical trial conducted between 2008 and 2010. The most common toxicity was neutropenia in response to 90 % of the relative dose intensity. Responses to NAC included radiological tumor shrinkage (69 %) and decreases in CA19-9 levels (89 %). R0 resection was performed for 87 % in resection, and the morbidity rate (40 %) was acceptable. The 2-year survival rate of the total cohort was 45.7 %. Patients who underwent resection without metastases after NAC-GS (n = 27) had an increased median overall survival (34.7 months) compared with those who did not undergo resection (P = 0.0017).

Conclusions

NAC-GS was well tolerated and safe when used in a multi-institutional setting. The R0 resection rate and the 2-year survival rate analysis are encouraging for patients with resectable and borderline PDAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004;363:1049–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1605–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S, et al. Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas. 2004;28:219–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, et al. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007;246:734–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gutt R, Liauw SL, Weichselbaum RR. Adjuvant radiotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer: a lack of benefit or a lack of adequate trials? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:38–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ueno H, Kosuge T, Matsuyama Y, et al. A randomised phase III trial comparing gemcitabine with surgery-only in patients with resected pancreatic cancer: Japanese Study Group of Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:908–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs. gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1073–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz MH, Fleming JB, Lee JE, Pisters PW. Current status of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:1205–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reni M. Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer: time for phase III testing? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4883–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Artinyan A, Anaya DA, McKenzie S, Ellenhorn JD, Kim J. Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:2044–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palmer DH, Stocken DD, Hewitt H, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2088–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heinrich S, Pestalozzi BC, Schäfer M, Weber A, Bauerfeind P, Knuth A, Clavien PA. Prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2526–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahora K, Kuehrer I, Eisenhut A, et al. NeoGemOx: gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced, nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2011;149:311–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Okusaka T, Funakoshi A, Furuse J, et al. A late phase II study of S-1 for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:615–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morizane C, Okusaka T, Furuse J, et al. A phase II study of S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:313–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, et al. A phase I study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:421–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee GW, Kim HJ, Ju JH, et al. Phase II trial of S-1 in combination with gemcitabine for chemo-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64:707–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, et al. A pilot study for combination chemotherapy using gemcitabine and S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2009;77:300–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oh DY, Cha Y, Choi IS, et al. A multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:527–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2007;246:46–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Padhani AR, Ollivier L. The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:983–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Evans DB, Rich TA, Byrd DR, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1335–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Version 2. 2012 http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.

  30. Ioka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Piperdi M, McDade TP, Shim JK, et al. A neoadjuvant strategy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases the likelihood of receiving all components of care: lessons from a single-institution database. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Le Scodan R, Mornex F, Girard N, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, treatment effect evaluation and prognostic factors, analysis of the SFRO-FFCD 9704 trial and literature review. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1387–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7: e1000267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. VanHouten JP, White RR, Jackson GP. A decision model of therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2012;174:222–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Heinrich S, Pestalozzi B, Lesurtel M, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III study (NEOPAC study). BMC Cancer. 2011;11:346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF). Surgery. 2005:138:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007:142:761–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 21591766 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank Dr. Tetsuyuki Uchiyama for his contribution to this study.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuyuhiko Motoi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Motoi, F., Ishida, K., Fujishima, F. et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and S-1 for Resectable and Borderline Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results from a Prospective Multi-institutional Phase 2 Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 3794–3801 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3129-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3129-9

Keywords

Navigation