Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast Cancer Mastectomy Trends Between 2006 and 2010: Association with Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Immediate Breast Reconstruction, and Hospital Volume

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Analysis of mastectomy rates in breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2010 in Germany with focus on impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates, and hospital volume as possible influencing factors of mastectomy rates.

Methods

Data of a voluntary monitored benchmarking project were used to evaluate mastectomy trends across time in an unselected cohort of breast cancer patients. We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictive factors of mastectomy.

Results

A total of 142.863 cases were included into the analysis. There was an overall decrease of 5.9 % (95 % confidence interval 5.1–6.7) in mastectomy trend from 36.5 % in 2006 to 30.6 % in 2010 (P < 0.0001). Known predictive factors were confirmed. Breast MRI (odds ratio 1.42, 95 % confidence interval 1.36–1.47) and small hospitals (<150 cases per year) seem to favor mastectomy. IBR was not associated with mastectomy rates.

Conclusions

Mastectomy rates in comparable health systems differ. Performance of preoperative breast MRI and hospital volume seem to be independent influencing factors for mastectomy rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–1232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. NIH Consensus Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–4088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–2690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, Virnig BA, Al-Refaie WB, Tuttle TM. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–3441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmood U, Hanlon AL, Koshy M, et al. Increasing national mastectomy rates for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1436–1443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Etienne CA, Tomatis M, Heil J, et al. Mastectomy trends for early-stage breast cancer: a report from the EUSOMA multi-institutional European database. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(13):1947–1956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Itakura K, Lessing J, Sakata T, et al. The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11:33–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson L, Pinder S, Douek M. Multiple foci of invasive breast cancer: can breast MRI influence surgical management? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Passaperuma K, Warner E, Causer PA, et al. Long-term results of screening with magnetic resonance imaging in women with BRCA mutations. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(1):24–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pediconi F, Miglio E, Telesca M, et al. Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:128–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heil J, Buehler A, Golatta M, et al. Do patients with invasive lobular breast cancer benefit in terms of adequate change in surgical therapy from a supplementary preoperative breast MRI? Ann Oncol. 2012;23:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Perono Biacchiardi C, Brizzi D, Genta F, Zanon E, Camanni M, Deltetto F. Breast cancer preoperative staging: does contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography modify surgery? Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:757234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dragun AE, Pan J, Riley EC, et al. Increasing use of elective mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic surgery among breast conservation candidates: a 14-year report from a comprehensive cancer center. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 [Epub ahead of print].

  16. Peltoniemi P, Peltola M, Hakulinen T, Hakkinen U, Pylkkanen L, Holli K. The effect of hospital volume on the outcome of breast cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1684–1690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallwiener M, Brucker SY, Wallwiener D. Multidisciplinary breast centres in Germany: a review and update of quality assurance through benchmarking and certification. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1671–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Etienne CA, Tomatis M, Heil J, et al. Fluctuating mastectomy rates across time and geography. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(7):2114–2116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Albert US, Schulz KD; German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), German Agency for Quality in Medicine (AeZQ). Short version of the Guideline: Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Germany. An evidence-, consensus-, and outcome-based guideline according to the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) and the German Agency for Quality in Medicine (AeZQ). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130:527–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz KD, Kreienberg R, Fischer R, et al. [Stage 3 recommendations—the early recognition of breast cancer in Germany. Abridged version for medical practitioners]. Radiologe. 2003;43:495–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Malek DPR. Evaluationsbericht. 2008–2009—Ergebnisse des Mammographie-Screening-Programmes in Deutschland. 2012. http://www.mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/evaluationsbericht_2008-2009_web.pdf

  22. Samnakay N, Tinning J, Ives A, et al. Rates for mastectomy are lower in women attending a breast-screening programme. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:936–939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Malmgren JA, Parikh J, Atwood MK, Kaplan HG. Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40–49 years. Radiology. 2012;262:797–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of MRI in Breast Cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Elmore L, Myckatyn TM, Gao F, et al. Reconstruction patterns in a single institution cohort of women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3223–3229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank all participating hospitals of the WBC for participating in the multicenter analysis; a complete list is available online (http://www.brustcentrum.de).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg Heil MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heil, J., Rauch, G., Szabo, A.Z. et al. Breast Cancer Mastectomy Trends Between 2006 and 2010: Association with Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Immediate Breast Reconstruction, and Hospital Volume. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 3839–3846 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3097-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3097-0

Keywords

Navigation