Abstract
Background
Breast reconstruction is an option for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who elect to undergo prophylactic mastectomy to prevent breast cancer. We report on the uptake of breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy in women with BRCA mutations from eight countries.
Methods
Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were questioned regarding their cancer preventive practices. Information was recorded on prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction.
Results
A total of 1,635 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who elected to undergo prophylactic mastectomy from eight countries were included. A total of 1,137 women (69.5 %) had breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy. A total of 58.7 % of women over the age of 45 years at the time of prophylactic mastectomy had breast reconstruction compared to 77.6 % of women 35 years of age or younger [odds ratio (OR) 0.36, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.26–0.50, p < 0.001]. In addition, 62.9 % of women with a breast cancer diagnosis (contralateral prophylactic mastectomy) had breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy compared to 79.7 % of women without a previous breast cancer diagnosis (OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.38–0.61, p < 0.001). A total of 66.9 % of women from Canada had breast reconstruction after mastectomy compared to 71.9 % of American women (OR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.59–0.96, p = 0.02).
Conclusions
The majority of women elect for breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy. However, younger women and those without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer are more likely to have breast reconstruction than older women or those with a previous diagnosis of cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antoniou AC, Shenton A, Maher ER, et al. Parity and breast cancer risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R72.
Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1329–33.
Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Lynch HT, et al. Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1384–92.
Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, et al. Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2328–35.
Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1633–7.
Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Janz NK, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5325–30.
Hall SE, Holman CDcInequalities in breast cancer reconstructive surgery according to social and locational status in Western Australia. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:519–25.
Hvilsom GB, Holmich LR, Frederiksen K, et al. Socioeconomic position and breast reconstruction in Danish women. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:265–73.
Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, et al. Regional variation in use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in England. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:750–5.
Yu KD, Di GH, Wu J, et al. Development and trends of surgical modalities for breast cancer in China: a review of 16-year data. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2502–9.
Metcalfe KA, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Lubinski J, et al. International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2017–22.
Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J, et al. The use of preventive measures among healthy women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Fam Cancer. 2005;4:97–103.
Baxter N, Goel V, Semple JL. Rates and regional variation of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: viewpoint from a single payer medical system. 2002.
Polednak AP. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in Connecticut: trends and predictors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:669–73.
Alderman AK, McMahon L Jr, Wilkins EG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:695–703.
Polednak AP. How frequent is postmastectomy breast reconstructive surgery? A study linking two statewide databases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:73–7.
Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:387–8.
Joslyn SA. Patterns of care for immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1289–96.
Rosson GD, Singh NK, Ahuja N, et al. Multilevel analysis of the impact of community vs patient factors on access to immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy in Maryland. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1076–81.
Tseng WH, Stevenson TR, Canter RJ, et al. Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1815–24.
Kruper L, Holt A, Xu XX, et al. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2158–65.
Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Data Base study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:1–8.
Tseng JF, Kronowitz SJ, Sun CC, et al. The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer. Cancer. 2004;101:1514–23.
Metcalfe KA, Goel V, Lickley L, et al. Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy: patterns of practice. Cancer. 2002;95:236–42.
Metcalfe KA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P, et al. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1093–7.
Acknowledgment
Dr. John Semple is supported through the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (Ontario Chapter).
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
The members of The Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical study group are listed in the Appendix.
Appendix
Appendix
Other members of the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group who contributed to the study: William D. Foulkes, Andrea Eisen, Ophira Ginsburg, Mary Daly, Dawna Gilchrist, Albert Chudley, Talia Donenberg, Beth Karlan, Jeffrey Weitzel, Dana Zakalik, Judy Garber, Edmond Lemire, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Sofia Merajver, Howard Saal, Louise Bordeleau, Carey A. Cullinane, Wendy McKinnon, Marie Wood, Daniel Rayson, Wendy Meschino, Jane McLennan, Josephine Wagner Costalas, Pal Moller, Ava Kwong, Claudine Isaacs, Fergus Couch, Siranoush Manoukian, and Taya Fallen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semple, J., Metcalfe, K.A., Lynch, H.T. et al. International Rates of Breast Reconstruction After Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 3817–3822 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3040-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3040-4