Skip to main content

Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy After Transitioning from Open Lobectomy

Annals of Surgical Oncology volume 20, pages 2734–2740 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Open lobectomy continues to be more commonly performed than video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. We previously described the short-term safety of an approach for transitioning from open lobectomy to VATS. We now assess its long-term safety by evaluating survival results of the initial VATS cases after transition.

Methods

From a prospective database, survival of stage I non–small cell lung cancer was compared between the first 40 VATS lobectomy and the 40 open lobectomy performed just before the transitioning to VATS. All patients underwent staging by positron emission tomographic scan and mediastinoscopy. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.

Results

Patient and intraoperative characteristics were not different between the two groups, except for operative time, which was longer for VATS (median 132 vs. 150 min, p = 0.023) and tumor size, which was smaller for VATS (median 2 vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.002). There was no difference in morbidity and mortality. Median follow-up was 118 months for the open group and 81 months for the VATS group. The 5-year disease-free survival for stage IA (90 % open vs. 97 % VATS, p = 0.439) and IB (74 % open vs. 79 % VATS, p = 0.478) were not different. The 5-year overall survival for stage IA (91 % open vs. 97 % VATS, p = 0.152) and IB (55 % open vs. 67 % VATS, p = 0.198) were also not different.

Conclusions

The transition from open to VATS lobectomy is safe with regards to both short-term morbidity and long-term survival. Surgeons currently performing open lobectomy should consider transitioning to the VATS procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, Gaissert HA, Harpole DH, Wright CD. Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:247–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gopaldas RR, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, Chu D. Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1563–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:366–78.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng T, Ryder BA. Evolution to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after training: initial results of the first 30 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:551–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores RM, Park BJ, Dycoco J, et al. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:11–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:2008–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips JD, Merkow RP, Sherman KL, Decamp MM, Bentrem DJ, Bilimoria KY. Factors affecting selection of operative approach and subsequent short-term outcomes after anatomic resection for lung cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:206–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:976–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Swanson SJ, Meyers BF, Gunnarsson CL, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is less costly and morbid than open lobectomy: a retrospective multiinstitutional database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1027–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg. 2000;24:27–30.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:421–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto K, Ohsumi A, Kojima F, et al. Long-term survival after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:353–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2553–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1903–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reed MF, Lucia MW, Starnes SL, Merrill WH, Howington JA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: introduction of a new technique into a thoracic surgery training program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:376–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    Anne M. Kuritzky MD, Beth A. Ryder MD, FACS & Thomas Ng MD, FRCSC, FACS

Authors
  1. Anne M. Kuritzky MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beth A. Ryder MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Ng MD, FRCSC, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Ng MD, FRCSC, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuritzky, A.M., Ryder, B.A. & Ng, T. Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy After Transitioning from Open Lobectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 2734–2740 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2929-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2929-2

Keywords

  • Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Positron Emission Tomographic
  • Early Stage Lung Cancer
  • Open Lobectomy
  • Visceral Pleural Invasion