Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic versus Open Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robotic surgery is gaining momentum with advantages for minimally invasive management of pancreatic diseases. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the clinical and oncologic safety and efficacy of robotic versus open pancreatectomy.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies comparing robotic pancreatectomy and open pancreatectomy. Postoperative outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and oncologic safety were evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model.

Results

Seven studies matched the selection criteria, including 137 (40 %) cases of robotic pancreatectomy and 203 (60 %) cases of open pancreatectomy. None of the included studies were randomized. Overall complication rate was significantly lower in robotic group [risk difference (RD) = −0.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) −0.22 to −0.01, P = 0.03], as well as reoperation rate (RD = −0.12; CI −0.2 to −0.03, P = 0.006) and margin positivity (RD = −0.18; 95 % CI −0.3 to −0.06, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) incidence and mortality. The median (range) conversion rate was 10 % (0–12 %).

Conclusions

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that robotic pancreatectomy is as safe and efficient as, if not superior to, open surgery for patients with benign or malignant pancreatic diseases. However, the evidence is limited and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further clearly define this role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:904–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB. Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg. 2001;182:137–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith CD, Farrell TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE. Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg. 2001;181:547–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13:33–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic gastrointestinal surgery: phase 2—safety and efficacy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1054–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS, Academic Robotics G. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1521–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang CM, Choi SH, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robot-assisted) approach for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the distal pancreas: a single-center experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, et al. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:131–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg. 2011;35:2739–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2095–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Secrest A, Dauoudi M, Bartlett D, Moser AJ. Outcomes after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:864–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan OCY, Tang CN, Lai ECH, Yang GPC, Li MKW. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:471–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1101-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hammill C, Cassera M, Swanstrom L, Hansen P. Robotic assistance may provide the technical capability to perform a safe, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB. 2010;12:198.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh M, Chalikonda S, Saavedra JRA, Lentz G, Fung J. Laparoscopic robotic assisted Whipple: early results of a novel technique and comparison with the standard open procedure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:S221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery. 2010;148:814–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003;237:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Annibale A, Orsini C, Morpurgo E, Sovernigo G. Robotic surgery: considerations after 250 procedures. Chir Ital. 2006;58:5–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Longnecker MP. Re: “Point/counterpoint: meta-analysis of observational studies”. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:779–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abraham NS, Byrne CJ, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:238–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008;247:49–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, et al. Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery. 2008;144:995–1001; discussion 1001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

    Jie Zhang MD, Wen-Ming Wu MD, Lei You MD & Yu-Pei Zhao MD

Authors
  1. Jie Zhang MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen-Ming Wu MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei You MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yu-Pei Zhao MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Pei Zhao MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Wu, WM., You, L. et al. Robotic versus Open Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 1774–1780 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2823-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2823-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation