Abstract
Background
Controversial results regarding the efficacy and toxicity of hypoxic abdominal and pelvic stop-flow perfusion chemotherapy (SFP) have been reported in relatively small series. Hence, because adequate assessment of its benefit in large homogenous cohorts is missing, acceptable morbidity should initially be assured in a series of adequate size. Additionally, risk factors should be assessed for eventual patient selection.
Methods
The morbidity of abdominal and pelvic SFP performed on a miscellaneous group of patients in our institute was analyzed and potential risk factors for adverse events were evaluated.
Results
Seventy abdominal (n = 42) and pelvic (n = 28) SFP were performed on 55 patients. In total, 28 adverse effects were observed after 30 % of the procedures. Severe (grade 3) adverse events were recorded only after 4 % of the procedures, while treatment-related life-threatening events and deaths were not present. Abdominal procedures when compared with pelvic ones were associated with increased systemic toxicity (36 vs. 7 %, p = 0.005). Advanced age, gender, prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, limited experience, repeated procedure, drug choice and omission of hemofiltration after SFP completion were not associated with statistically significant increase of procedures with overall or systemic adverse events.
Conclusions
In the present series, abdominal and pelvic SFP was associated with an acceptable morbidity, which was mostly mild or moderate. Abdominal procedures were associated with increased toxicity. This procedure seems to be repeatable and also well tolerated both by elderly patients and by patients who had undergone prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, while hemofiltration does not appear to decrease the incidence of systemic toxicity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pilati P, Mocellin S, Miotto D, et al. Stop-flow technique for loco-regional delivery of antiblastic agents: literature review and personal experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;28:544–53.
Aigner KR. Aortic stop-flow infusion (ASI) and hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HPP) for disseminated bulky peritoneal carcinomatosis: rationale and technique. Reg Cancer Treat. 1993;6:3.
Aigner KR, Kaevel K. Pelvic stop flow infusion (PSI) and hypoxic pelvic perfusion (HPP) with mitomycin C and melphalan for recurrent rectal cancer. Reg Cancer Treat. 1994;7:6–11.
Thompson JF, Liu M, Waugh RC, et al. A percutaneous aortic “stop-flow” infusion technique for regional cytotoxic therapy of the abdomen and pelvis. Reg Cancer Treat. 1994;7:202–7.
Strocchi E, Iaffaioti RV, Facchini G, et al. Stop-flow technique for loco-regional delivery of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pelvic cancers. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:663–70.
Roversi R, Ricci S, Rossi G, Cavallo G, Roversi M, Fiorentini G. Results of flow-controlled antiblastic perfusions (stop-flow technique) carried out with percutaneous technique: 30-month experience. Radiol Med (Torino). 1997;93:732–8.
Guadagni S, Kanavos E, Schietroma M, Fiorentini G, Amicucci G. Selected hypoxic stop-flow perfusions: indication and limits. Tumori. 2006;92:402–6.
Aigner KR. Intra-arterial infusion: overview and novel approaches. Semin Surg Oncol. 1998;14:248–53.
Fiorentini G, Poddie D, Ricci S, et al. Intra-aortic stop flow infusion (IASFI) with hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HAP) in UICC stage III/IV pancreatic carcinoma (PC): report of a phase II study. Reg Cancer Treat. 1996;9:88–91.
Wanebo HJ, DiSiena M, Begossi G, Belliveau J, Gustafson E. Isolated chemotherapeutic perfusion of pelvis as neoadjuvant or palliative therapy for advanced cancer of the rectum. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1107–16.
Iaffaioli RV, Facchini G, Tortoriello A, et al. Stop flow in abdominal and pelvic relapses. Front Biosci. 2006;11:1284–8.
Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Kalogeraki A, et al. Treatment of unresectable malignant abdominal, pelvic and thoracic tumors using abdominal, pelvic and thoracic stop-flow chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:3669–75.
Pohlen U, Rieger H, Kunick-Pohlen S, Berger G, Buhr HJ. Phase II study of regional chemotherapy using the hypoxic abdominal perfusion technique in advanced abdominal carcinoma. 5-FU pharmacokinetics, complications and outcome. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:667–74.
Lorenz M, Heinrich S, Staib-Sebler E, Köhne C-H, Wils J, Nordlinger B, Encke A. Regional chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer—is it relevant? Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:957–65.
van IJken MGA, van Etten B, Guetens G, et al. Balloon catheter hypoxic abdominal perfusion with mitomycin C and melphalan for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I–II trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:671–80.
van IJken MGA, van Etten B, Guetens G, et al. Balloon catheter hypoxic pelvic perfusion with mitomycin C and melphalan for locally advanced tumours in the pelvic region: a phase I–II trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:897–904.
Meyer F, Ridwelski K, Bebauer T, Grote R, Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Lippert H. Pharmacokinetics of the antineoplastic drug mitomycin C in regional chemotherapy using the aortic stop-flow technique in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Chemotherapy. 2005;51:1–8.
Meyer F, Gebauer T, Grote R, Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Ridwelski K, Lippert H. Results of regional chemotherapy using the aortic stop-flow technique in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Today. 2006;36:155–61.
Lorenz M, Petrowsky H, Heinrich S, et al. No benefit of isolated hypoxic perfusion with mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:542–7.
Zanon C, Goss M, Nicola F, et al. Limits of aortic stop flow infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced cancer. Panminerva Med. 2001;43:243–8.
De Santis M, Ariosi P, Calo GF, Luppi G, Franchini M, Romagnoli R. Antineoplastic perfusion with percutaneous stop-flow control in the treatment of advanced pelvic malignant neoplasms. Radiol Med. 2000;100:56–61.
Klein ES, Ben-Ari GY, Papa MZ, Adar R, Bass A. Vascular complications of total abdominal perfusion and aortic stop-flow infusion. J Surg Oncol. 1996;61:17–9.
National Cancer Institute. Enterprise Vocabulary Services. CTCAE files. NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4 data files and related documents. http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html. Accessed 12 April 2012.
Hofland J, Tenbrinck R, van Ijken MGA, van Eijck CHJ, Eggermont AMM, Erdmann W. Cardiovascular effects of simultaneous occlusion of the inferior vena cava and aorta in patients treated with hypoxic abdominal perfusion for chemotherapy. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:193–8.
Varrassi, G, Guadagni S, Ciccozzi A, et al. Hemodynamic variations during thoracic and abdominal stop-flow regional chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:377–83.
Guadagni S, Clementi M, Valenti M, et al. Hypoxic abdominal stop-flow perfusion in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II evaluation/trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:72–8.
Kuemmerle A, Decosterd LA, Buclin T, et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic study of hypoxic abdominal stop-flow perfusion with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and refractory malignant ascites. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:331–41.
Bonvalot S, Muret J, Debaere T. La perfusion pelvienne sous circulation extracorporelle dans les tumeurs pelviennes localement évoluées [Pelvic perfusion for locally advanced tumors]. Bull Cancer. 2009;96:103–9.
Bonvalot S, Muret J, Debaere T, et al. High response rates with isolated pelvic perfusion (IPP) with a pneumatic anti-shock garments (PASG) and low dose TNF-α for locally advanced pelvic sarcomas and carcinomas: a phase II unicenter trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(Suppl):10586.
Wanebo HJ, Chung MA, Levy AI, Turk PS, Vezeridis MP, Belliveau JF. Preoperative therapy for advanced pelvic malignancy by isolated pelvic perfusion with the balloon-occlusion technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:295–303.
Wouters A, Pauwels B, Lardon F, Vermorken JB. Review: implications of in vitro research on the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy under hypoxic conditions. Oncologist. 2007;12:690–712.
Kennedy KA, Siegfried JM, Sartorelli AC, Tritton TR. Effects of anthracyclines on oxygenated and hypoxic tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1983;43:54–9.
Skarsgard LD, Skwarchuk MW, Vinczan A, Kristl J, Chaplin DJ. The cytotoxicity of melphalan and its relationship to pH, hypoxia and drug uptake. Anticancer Res. 1995;15:219–23.
Pruijn FB, van Daalen M, Holford NH, Wilson WR. Mechanisms of enhancement of the antitumour activity of melphalan by the tumour-blood-flow inhibitor 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1997;39:541–6.
Rockwell S. Effect of some proliferative and environmental factors on the toxicity of mitomycin C to tumor cells in vitro. Int J Cancer. 1986;38:229–35.
Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004;36:1049–57.
Kornmann M, Butzer U, Blatter J, Beger HG, Link KH. Pre-clinical evaluation of the activity of gemcitabine as a basis for regional chemotherapy of pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:583–7.
Kroon BBR, Noorda EM, Vrouenraets BC, van Slooten GW, Nieweg OE. Isolated limb perfusion for melanoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2008;17:785–94.
Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1914–21.
Guadagni S, Aigner KR, Palumbo G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mitomycin C in pelvic stop flow infusion and hypoxic pelvic perfusion with and without hemofiltration: a pilot study of patients with recurrent unresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;38:936–44.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Eugenia Bolbasis for her English-language review.
Conflict of Interest
All authors disclose no financial or personal conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Bree, E., Romanos, J., Tsogkas, J. et al. Complications and Toxicity After Abdominal and Pelvic Hypoxic Stop-Flow Perfusion Chemotherapy: Incidence and Assessment of Risk Factors. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 3591–3597 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2383-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2383-6