Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technical Considerations in Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Position Paper from E-Surge, a Master Class in Sarcoma Surgery, and EORTC–STBSG

  • Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgery is the principal treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma. These tumors typically involve or abut multiple organs and therefore require multivisceral resections. Despite the complexity of such operations, a standardized approach has not been described. As a result, referral centers often see patients who have undergone suboptimal surgery, with gross disease left behind. This is one of the causes of the dismal prognosis of this disease.

Methods

These consensus statements came out from E-Surge, an educational symposium with live sarcoma surgery, performed by European and North American expert sarcoma surgeons illustrating an optimal technique to an international audience, held in 2010 and 2011. The content was then shared among members of the local subcommittee of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)–Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG).

Results

An attempt to describe a reproducible and standardized approach to these tumors is illustrated. A detailed description of the different procedures according to the variety of different presentations is made.

Conclusions

The approach described herein should be used as the reference standard in clinical practice and serve to perform quality check of local treatment in future trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Woodruff JM. Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution. Ann Surg. 1998;228:355–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoeckle E, Coindre JM, Bonvalot S, et al. Prognostic factors in retroperitoneal sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of a series of 165 patients of the French Cancer Center Federation Sarcoma Group. Cancer. 2001;92:359–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrario T, Karakousis CP. Retroperitoneal sarcomas: grade and survival. Arch Surg. 2003;138:248–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kilkenny JW, Bland KI, Copel EM. Retroperitoneal sarcoma: the University of Florida experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182:329–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gronchi A, Casali PG, Fiore M, et al. Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: patterns of recurrence in 167 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer. 2004;100:2448–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassan I, Park SZ, Donohue JH, et al. Operative management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a reappraisal of an institutional experience. Ann Surg. 2004;239:244–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Dalen T, Plooij JM, van Coevorden F, et al. Long-term prognosis of primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:234–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehnert T, Cardona S, Hinz U, et al. Primary and locally recurrent retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: local control and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:986–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thway K, et al. Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Br J Surg. 2010;101:520–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonvalot S, Rivoire M, Castaing M, et al. Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gronchi A, Lo Vullo S, Fiore M, et al. Aggressive surgical policies in a retrospectively reviewed single-institution case series of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwarzbach MH, Hohenberger P. Current concepts in the management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;179:301–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gronchi A, Miceli R, Colombo C, et al. Frontline extended surgery is associated with improved survival in retroperitoneal low- to intermediate-grade soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):1067–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonvalot S, Miceli R, Berselli M. Aggressive surgery in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma carried out at high-volume centers is safe and is associated with improved local control. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1507–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tseng WH, Martinez SR, Tamurian RM, et al. Contiguous organ resection is safe in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Irani JL, Ashley SW, Brooks DC, et al. Distal pancreatectomy is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity when performed as part of a multivisceral resection. J Gastroint Surg. 2008;12:2177–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berselli M, Coppola S, Colombo C, et al. Morbidity of left pancreatectomy when associated with multivisceral resection for abdominal mesenchymal neoplasms. JOP. 2011;12:138–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawaguchi N, Ahmed AR, Matsumoto S, et al. The concept of curative margin in surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop. 2004;419:165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin PP, Pino ED, Normand AN, et al. Periosteal margin in soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2007;109:598–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clarkson PW, Griffin MA, Catton CM, et al. Epineural dissection is a safe technique which facilitates limb salvage surgery. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2005;438:92–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gronchi A, Lo Vullo S, Colombo C, et al. Extremity soft tissue sarcoma in a series of patients treated at a single institution: local control directly impacts survival. Ann Surg. 2011;251:512–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gerrand CH, Wunder JS, Kandel RA, et al. Classification of positive margins after resection of soft tissue sarcoma of the limb predicts the risk of local recurrence. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1149–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gronchi A, Pollock R. Surgery in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: a call for a consensus between Europe and North America. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2107–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lahat G, Madewell JE, Anaya DA, et al. Computed tomography scan-driven selection of treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma histologic subtypes. Cancer. 2009;115:1081–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fiore M, Colombo C, Locati P, et al. Surgical technique, morbidity, and outcome of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma involving inferior vena cava. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:511–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwarzbach MH, Hormann Y, Hinz U, et al. Clinical results of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma with major blood vessel involvement. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:46–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Vreeland TC, Van Coevorden F, Zoetmulder FAN. Continuous abdominolumbar incision for exposure of the retroperitoneum. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:619–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Syvie Bonvalot MD, PhD or Alessandro Gronchi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonvalot, S., Raut, C.P., Pollock, R.E. et al. Technical Considerations in Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Position Paper from E-Surge, a Master Class in Sarcoma Surgery, and EORTC–STBSG. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 2981–2991 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2342-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2342-2

Keywords

Navigation