Bioluminescence Imaging Serves as a Dynamic Marker for Guiding and Assessing Thermal Treatment of Cancer in a Preclinical Model
- 188 Downloads
Bioluminescence has been harnessed as a dynamic imaging technique in research. This is a proof of principle study examining feasibility of using bioluminescent proteins as a marker to guide therapeutic ablation.
Mesothelioma cancer cells (MSTO-Td) were transfected with a retroviral vector bearing firefly luciferase gene, plated in serial dilutions, and imaged to compare bioluminescence signal to cell number, determining threshold of bioluminescence detection. MSTO-Td cells were subjected to thermal treatment in a heated chamber; the bioluminescence signal and number of remaining live cancer cells were determined. Mice with MSTO-Td xenografts underwent electrocautery tumor ablation guided by bioluminescence imaging; bioluminescence signal and tumor size were monitored for 3 weeks.
MSTO-Td cells emitted a bright, clear, bioluminescence signal that amplified with the cell number (P < .001) and was detectable with as few as 10 cells in cell culture. Bioluminescence decreased in a dose-dependent fashion upon thermal treatment as temperature increased from 37 to 70 °C (P < .001) and as treatment duration increased from 5 to 20 min (P < .001). This correlated with the number of remaining live MSTO-Td cells (Pearson coefficient = 0.865; P < .001). In mice, the bioluminescence signal correlated with tumor size posttreatment and effectively guided the ablation procedure to completion, achieving 0 % tumor recurrence.
Bioluminescence imaging is a sensitive, real-time imaging approach; bioluminescence reporters such as firefly luciferase can assess and guide thermal treatment of cancer. This encourages research into bioluminescence imaging as a molecular technique with potential to target tumors via biomarkers and optimize thermal treatment procedures in a clinical setting.
- 9.Klerk CP, Overmeer RM, Niers TM, Versteeg HH, Richel DJ, Buckle T, et al. Validity of bioluminescence measurements for noninvasive in vivo imaging of tumor load in small animals. Biotechniques. 2007;43:7–13, 30.Google Scholar
- 27.Oude Munnink TH, Nagengast WB, Brouwers AH, Schröder CP, Hospers GA, Lub-de Hooge MN, et al. Molecular imaging of breast cancer. Breast. 2009;18 Suppl 3:S66–73.Google Scholar