Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Unilateral Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract

Background

There has been an increasing trend toward contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in the management of breast cancer (BCa). This study’s objective was to compare clinicopathologic characteristics of BCa patients who elected CPM to those who elected unilateral total mastectomy (UTM) and to determine whether CPM improved survival.

Methods

Comparison was performed on 355 patients with stage 0–III BCa matched by age and stage who underwent mastectomy from 1995 to 2008: 177 patients had CPM; 178 patients had UTM. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Women who underwent preoperative MRI were twice as likely to have CPM (40.9 vs. 19.7%, P < 0.001). MRI identified additional suspicious foci in 45% CPM and 19% UTM. Patients with history of previous breast biopsies, family history, or BRCA mutation were more likely to choose CPM than UTM (40.1 vs. 24%, P = 0.001; 64.3 vs. 41.4%, P < 0.001; 20.3 vs. 6.5%, P = 0.04, respectively). CPM patients elected nipple preservation (26 vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001) and immediate reconstruction more often (92.2 vs. 73.5%, P < 0.001); UTM patients were more likely to have attempted breast conservation prior to mastectomy (52.8 vs. 39.5%, P = 0.01). CPM identified occult BCa in 11 patients (6.6%), and three UTM patients (1.7%) developed contralateral BCa. With median follow-up of 61 months, by univariable/multivariable analyses, CPM did not improve overall, disease-free, or distant metastases-free survival.

Conclusion

Factors that may influence choice of CPM included preoperative MRI, history of prior breast biopsies, immediate reconstruction, nipple preservation, family history, and BRCA status. Those who chose CPM did not have improved survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Peto J, Mack TM. High constant incidence in twins and other relatives of women with breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2000;26:411–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Healey EA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR. Contralateral breast cancer: clinical characteristics and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:1545–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, Hellman S. Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up. Surgery. 1989;106:904–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kollias J, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Blamey RW. Clinical and histological predictors of contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:584–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nichols HB, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Lacey JV Jr, Rosenberg PS, Anderson WF. Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1564–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, Meade T, Parbhoo J, Mathias M, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, Stephens J, Farrar WB, Agnese DM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2691–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2697–704.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, Wallace J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD002748.

  10. 10.

    Lee JS, Grant CS, Donohue JH, Crotty TB, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM. Arguments against routine contralateral mastectomy or undirected biopsy for invasive lobular breast cancer. Surgery. 1995;118:640–7; discussion 647–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Goldflam K, Hunt KK, Gershenwald JE, Singletary SE, Mirza N, Kuerer HM, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Predictors of significant histologic findings. Cancer. 2004;101:1977–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Babiera GV, Lowy AM, Davidson BS, Singletary SE. The role of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast J. 1997;3:2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Peralta EA, Ellenhorn JD, Wagman LD, Dagis A, Andersen JS, Chu DZ. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;180:439–45.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Herrinton LJ, Barlow WE, Yu O, Geiger AM, Elmore JG, Barton MB, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4275–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    van Sprundel TC, Schmidt MK, Rookus MA, Brohet R, van Asperen CJ, Rutgers EJ, et al. Risk reduction of contralateral breast cancer and survival after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:287–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bedrosian I, Hu CY, Chang GJ. Population-based study of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival outcomes of breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:401–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stucky CC, Gray RJ, Wasif N, Dueck AC, Pockaj BA. Increase in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: echoes of a bygone era? Surgical trends for unilateral breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:330–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yao K, Stewart AK, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2554–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McLaughlin CC, Lillquist PP, Edge SB, Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 through 2005. Cancer. 2009;115:5404–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, Arrington A, Abraham A, Morris TJ, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hoover DJ, Paragi PR, Santoro E, Schafer S, Chamberlain RS. Prophylactic mastectomy in high risk patients: a practice-based review of the indications. Do we follow guidelines? Breast Dis. 2010;31:19–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Damle S, Teal CB, Lenert JJ, Marshall EC, Pan Q, McSwain AP. Mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates: an institutional review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1356–63.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yi M, Hunt KK, Arun BK, Bedrosian I, Barrera AG, Do KA, et al. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3:1026–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Metcalfe KA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P, Lynch H, Kim-Sing C, Frieman E, et al. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1093–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1597–605.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2158–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Quan G, Pommier SJ, Pommier RF. Incidence and outcomes of contralateral breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2008;195:645–50; discussion 650.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Sellers TA, Johnson JL, Kasner MJ, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a survival advantage in high-risk women with a personal history of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2702–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Chung MD.

Additional information

Alice Chung and Kelly Huynh are co-first-authors of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, A., Huynh, K., Lawrence, C. et al. Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Unilateral Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 2600–2606 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2299-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Contralateral Breast Cancer
  • Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
  • Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence
  • Unilateral Breast Cancer