Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aberrant Gene Methylation Is a Biomarker for the Detection of Cancer Cells in Peritoneal Wash Samples from Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

  • Translational Research and Biomarkers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess whether gene methylation in peritoneal fluid (PF) is clinically feasible for determining micrometastasis to the peritoneum in gastric cancer.

Methods

The gene methylation of BNIP3, CHFR, CYP1B1, MINT25, SFRP2, and RASSF2 were analyzed in 107 specimens of PF by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. All patients were placed into one of 3 groups: group A (n = 42), patients with depth of cancer invasion at muscularis propria (MP) or less than MP; group B (n = 45), depth of cancer invasion beyond the MP; and group C (n = 20), histologically diagnosed peritoneal metastasis or cancer cells cytologically defined in the peritoneal cavity. Patients in both groups A and B were diagnosed as having no cancer cells by peritoneal cytology and histology.

Results

The methylation status of the 6 genes was found to be significantly different among the 3 groups (group A, 0–5%; group B, 0–15%; group C, 15–45%; P < 0.01). Furthermore, the rate of positive methylation in any of the 6 genes was significantly different in each group (group A, 7%; group B, 20%; group C, 75%; P < 0.001). Three of 9 patients in group B with positive methylation in any of 6 genes experienced peritoneal recurrence. On the other hand, only 1 of 36 patients without gene methylation experienced peritoneal recurrence (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

DNA methylation in PFs is a possible marker detecting occult neoplastic cells on the peritoneum. Methylation analysis along with a cytological examination might therefore improve the positive detection of cancer cells in PF of gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoo CH, Noh SH, Shin DW, Choi SH, Min JS. Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2000;87:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujiwara Y, Doki Y, Taniguchi H, et al. Genetic detection of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of the patient with gastric cancer: present status and future perspectives. Gastric Cancer. 2007;10:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee CC, Lo SS, Wu CW, et al. Peritoneal recurrence of gastric adenocarcinoma after curative resection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:1720–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mori K, Suzuki T, Uozaki H, et al. Detection of minimal gastric cancer cells in peritoneal washings by focused microarray analysis with multiple markers: clinical implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1694–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto M, Baba H, Toh Y, Okamura T, Maehara Y. Peritoneal lavage CEA/CA125 is a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007;133:471–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Da MX, Wu XT, Guo TK, et al. Clinical significance of telomerase activity in peritoneal lavage fluid from patients with gastric cancer and its relationship with cellular proliferation. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3122–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiraki M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, et al. Aberrant gene methylation in the peritoneal fluid is a risk factor predicting peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:330–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Okami J, Simeone DM, Logsdon CD. Silencing of the hypoxia-inducible cell death protein BNIP3 in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5338–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Lau KK, So LK, Lam YW. CHD5 is down-regulated through promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer. J Biomed Sci. 2009;16:95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiraki M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, et al. Aberrant gene methylation in the lymph nodes provides a possible marker for diagnosing micrometastasis in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang GH, Lee S, Cho NY, et al. DNA methylation profiles of gastric carcinoma characterized by quantitative DNA methylation analysis. Lab Invest. 2008;88:161–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu CS, Lu YJ, Li HP, et al. Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 2 silencing by DNA hypermethylation possesses tumor suppressor function in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:2542–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe Y, Kim HS, Castoro RJ, et al. Sensitive and specific detection of early gastric cancer with DNA methylation analysis of gastric washes. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2149–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Du P, Ye HR, Gao J, et al. Methylation of PTCH1a gene in a subset of gastric cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3799–806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagasaka T, Tanaka N, Cullings HM, et al. Analysis of fecal DNA methylation to detect gastrointestinal neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1244–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, et al. MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:E32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carvalho AL, Jeronimo C, Kim MM, et al. Evaluation of promoter hypermethylation detection in body fluids as a screening/diagnosis tool for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:97–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katayama H, Hiraki A, Aoe K, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation in pleural fluid DNA for diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:2191–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fackler MJ, Malone K, Zhang Z, et al. Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR analysis doubles detection of tumor cells in breast ductal fluid. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3306–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibanez de Caceres I, Battagli C, Esteller M, et al. Tumor cell-specific BRCA1 and RASSF1A hypermethylation in serum, plasma, and peritoneal fluid from ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6476–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klump B, Hsieh CJ, Dette S, et al. Promoter methylation of INK4a/ARF as detected in bile-significance for the differential diagnosis in biliary disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1773–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsubayashi H, Canto M, Sato N, et al. DNA methylation alterations in the pancreatic juice of patients with suspected pancreatic disease. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1208–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Roupret M, Hupertan V, Yates DR, et al. Molecular detection of localized prostate cancer using quantitative methylation-specific PCR on urinary cells obtained following prostate massage. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1720–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiko Kitajima MD, PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiraki, M., Kitajima, Y., Koga, Y. et al. Aberrant Gene Methylation Is a Biomarker for the Detection of Cancer Cells in Peritoneal Wash Samples from Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 3013–3019 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1636-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1636-0

Keywords

Navigation