Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1439–1446 | Cite as

Comparison of Endoscopic and Robotic Thyroidectomy

  • J. Lee
  • J. H. Lee
  • K. Y. Nah
  • E. Y. Soh
  • W. Y. Chung
Head and Neck Oncology

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic thyroidectomy is a technically challenging procedure. Robot-assisted thyroidectomy has been recently introduced and offers improved visualization and dexterity. The present study compared conventional endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer patients in terms of perioperative outcomes and learning curve. All operations were performed by the same surgeon.

Materials and Methods

Between April 2007 and March 2010, 96 patients underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy (endoscopy group) and 163 patients underwent robotic thyroidectomy (robot group). A gasless transaxillary approach was used in both groups. The 2 groups were compared in terms of patient characteristics, perioperative clinical results, complications, and pathologic details. Learning curves for the 2 procedures were compared based on the number of cases required to reach a consistent operation time.

Results

Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The mean total operation time for thyroidectomy with central compartment neck dissection was 142.7 ± 52.1 min in the endoscopy group and 110.1 ± 50.7 min in the robot group (P = .041). Both patient groups were similar in terms of pathological features including TNM stage, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rate. However, the mean number of retrieved central lymph nodes was 2.4 ± 1.9 for the endoscopy group and 4.5 ± 1.5 for the robot group (P = .004). The learning curve was 55–60 cases for endoscopic thyroidectomy and 35–40 cases for robotic thyroidectomy.

Conclusion

Robotic thyroidectomy was found to be superior to endoscopic thyroidectomy in terms of operation time, lymph node retrieval, and learning curve. Complication rates and postoperative hospital stay were similar for the 2 procedures.

References

  1. 1.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S. Clinical benefits in endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:189–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Kurihara H. Are there significant benefits of minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy? World J Surg. 2004;28:1075–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung YS, Choe JH, Kang KH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2007;31:2302–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeong JJ, Kang SW, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, et al. Comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:477–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koh YW, Park JH, Kim JW, Lee SW, Choi EC. Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy with prophylactic ipsilateral central neck dissection via an unilateral axillo-breast approach without gas insufflation for unilateral micropapillary thyroid carcinoma: preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:188–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146:1048–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, JS Yun, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2399–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:e1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewis CM, Chung WY, Holsinger FC. Feasibility and surgical approach of transaxillary approach robotic thyroidectomy without CO(2) insufflation. Head Neck. 2010;32:121–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY. Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3186–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tae K, Ji YB, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Jeong MA, Park CW. Robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach: our early experiences. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1163-2. 2010 June 22. [Epub ahead of print].
  12. 12.
    Choi JS, Kim J, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Chang HS, Kim EK. Preoperative staging of papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of ultrasound imaging and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:871–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1167–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoon JH, Park CH, Chung WY. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach: experience of 30 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16:226–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, et al. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy using trans-axillary approach; surgical outcome of 581 patients. Endocr J. 2009;56:361–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holsinger FC, Terris DJ, Kuppersmith RB. Robotic thyroidectomy: operative technique using a transaxillary endoscopic approach without CO2 insufflation. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2010;43:381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diggle P. Time series: a biostatistical introduction. London: Oxford University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY. The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1220-z. Aug 3, 2010. [Epub ahead of print].
  19. 19.
    Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, Melamud O, Yee DS, Abraham JB, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol. 2008;22:947–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazzaferri EL. Papillary thyroid carcinoma: factors influencing prognosis and current therapy. Semin Oncol. 1987;14:315–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhattacharyya N. Surgical treatment of cervical nodal metastases in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:1101–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan CT, Cheah WK, Delbridge L. “Scarless” (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET): an evidence-based review of published techniques. World J Surg. 2008;32:1349–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slotema ET, Sebag F, Henry JF. What is the evidence for endoscopic thyroidectomy in the management of benign thyroid disease? World J Surg. 2008;32:1325–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu S, Qiu M, Jiang DZ, Zheng XM, Zhang W, Shen HL, et al. The learning curve for endoscopic thyroidectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1802–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Lee
    • 1
  • J. H. Lee
    • 1
  • K. Y. Nah
    • 1
  • E. Y. Soh
    • 1
  • W. Y. Chung
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryAjou University School of MedicineSuwonKorea
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations