Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of Inpatient Death and Complications among Postoperative Elderly Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Risks of brain surgery in elderly patients with brain metastases are not well defined. This study was designed to quantify the postoperative risk for these patients after brain surgery for metastatic disease to the brain.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998–2005). Patients aged 65 years or older who underwent tumor resection of brain metastases were identified by ICD-9 coding. Primary outcome was inpatient death. Other outcomes included systemic postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charges.

Results

A total of 4,907 patients (53.6% men) were identified. Mean age was 72.1 years. Mean Charlson comorbidity score was 7.8. Inpatient mortality was 4%. The most common adverse events were pulmonary complications (3.4%). Mean length of stay was 9.2 days. Mean total charges were $57,596.39.

In multivariate analysis, patients up to age 80 years had no significantly greater odds of inpatient death, relative to their 65- to 69-year-old counterparts. Each 1-point increase in Charlson score was associated with 12% increased odds of death, 0.52 days increased LOS, and $1,710.61 higher hospital charges. Postoperative pulmonary complications, stroke, or thromboembolic events increased LOS and total charges by up to 9.6 days and $57,664.42, respectively. These associations were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Surgical resection of brain metastases among the elderly up to the ninth decade of life is feasible. Age older than 80 years and higher Charlson comorbidity scores were found to be important prognostic factors for inpatient outcome. Incorporating these factors into preoperative decision making may help to select appropriately those elderly candidates for neurosurgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer facts and figures. Statistics for 2005 http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2005f4PWSecured.pdf.

  2. Norden AD, Wen PY, Kesari S. Brain metastases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18(6):654–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanner AA, Bokstein F, Blumenthal DT, Ram Z. Surgical therapies in brain metastasis. Semin Oncol. 2007;34(3):197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaal EC, Niel CG, Vecht CJ. Therapeutic management of brain metastasis. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(5):289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson GF, Hussey PS. Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000;19(3):191–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carnes BA, Olshansky SJ. Heterogeneity and its biodemographic implications for longevity and mortality. Exp Gerontol. 2001;36(3):419–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalkanis SN, Linskey ME. Evidence-based clinical practice parameter guidelines for the treatment of patients with metastatic brain tumors: introduction. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(1):7–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson PD, Kalkanis SN, Linskey ME, Santaguida PL. Methodology used to develop the AANS/CNS management of brain metastases evidence-based clinical practice parameter guidelines. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(1):11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noordijk EM, Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H, et al. The choice of treatment of single brain metastasis should be based on extracranial tumor activity and age. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29(4):711–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW, et al. A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(8):494–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H, Noordijk EM, et al. Treatment of single brain metastasis: radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgery? Ann Neurol. 1993;33(6):583–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eiseman B. Surgical decision making and elderly patients. Bull Am Coll Surg. 1996;81(2):8–11, 65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukuse T, Satoda N, Hijiya K, Fujinaga T. Importance of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in prediction of complications following thoracic surgery in elderly patients. Chest. 2005;127(3):886–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Usman AA, Tang GL, Eskandari MK. Metaanalysis of procedural stroke and death among octogenarians: carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(6):1124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(3):347–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabeneck L, Davila JA, Thompson M, El-Serag HB. Outcomes in elderly patients following surgery for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(10):1115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barker FG II. Craniotomy for the resection of metastatic brain tumors in the U.S., 1988–2000: decreasing mortality and the effect of provider caseload. Cancer. 2004;100(5):999–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bindal RK, Sawaya R, Leavens ME, Hess KR, Taylor SH. Reoperation for recurrent metastatic brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(4):600–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bindal RK, Sawaya R, Leavens ME, Lee JJ. Surgical treatment of multiple brain metastases. J Neurosurg. 1993;79(2):210–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brell M, Ibanez J, Caral L, Ferrer E. Factors influencing surgical complications of intra-axial brain tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(7):739–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lang FF, Sawaya R. Surgical treatment of metastatic brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol. 1998;14(1):53–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paek SH, Audu PB, Sperling MR, Cho J, Andrews DW. Reevaluation of surgery for the treatment of brain metastases: review of 208 patients with single or multiple brain metastases treated at one institution with modern neurosurgical techniques. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(5):1021–34; discussion 1021–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabadan AT, Hernandez D, Eleta M, et al. Factors related to surgical complications and their impact on the functional status in 236 open surgeries for malignant tumors in a Latino-American hospital. Surg Neurol. 2007;68(4):412–20; discussion 420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sawaya R, Hammoud M, Schoppa D, et al. Neurosurgical outcomes in a modern series of 400 craniotomies for treatment of parenchymal tumors. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(5):1044–55; discussion 1055–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stark AM, Tscheslog H, Buhl R, Held-Feindt J, Mehdorn HM. Surgical treatment for brain metastases: prognostic factors and survival in 177 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2005;28(2):115–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan TC, Mc LBP. Image-guided craniotomy for cerebral metastases: techniques and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2003;53(1):82–9; discussion 89–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frazier JL, Batra S, Kapor S, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases: an institutional retrospective analysis of survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(5):1486–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lutterbach J, Bartelt S, Momm F, Becker G, Frommhold H, Ostertag C. Is older age associated with a worse prognosis due to different patterns of care? A long-term study of 1346 patients with glioblastomas or brain metastases. Cancer. 2005;103(6):1234–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Patil CG, Veeravagu A, Lad S, Boakye M. Craniotomy for resection of meningioma in the elderly: a multicenter, prospective analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(5):502–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ampil F, Caldito G, Milligan S, Mills G, Nanda A. The elderly with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer and solitary brain metastasis: does palliative thoracic radiotherapy have a useful role? Lung Cancer. 2007;57(1):60–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, et al. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37(4):745–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Patil CG, Lad SP, Santarelli J, Boakye M. National inpatient complications and outcomes after surgery for spinal metastasis from 1993–2002. Cancer. 2007;110(3):625–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pietila TA, Stendel R, Hassler WE, Heimberger C, Ramsbacher J, Brock M. Brain tumor surgery in geriatric patients: a critical analysis in 44 patients over 80 years. Surg Neurol. 1999;52(3):259–63; discussion 263–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bateman BT, Pile-Spellman J, Gutin PH, Berman MF. Meningioma resection in the elderly: nationwide inpatient sample, 1998–2002. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(5):866–72; discussion 866–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rogne SG, Konglund A, Meling TR, et al. Intracranial tumor surgery in patients >70 years of age: is clinical practice worthwhile or futile? Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;120(5):288–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pirzkall A, Debus J, Lohr F, et al. Radiosurgery alone or in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(11):3563–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(1):8–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Srivastava G, Rana V, Wallace S, et al. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage and cerebrovascular accidents in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4(3):333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Black P, Kathiresan S, Chung W. Meningioma surgery in the elderly: a case–control study assessing morbidity and mortality. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(10):1013–6; discussion 1016–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Eichler AF, Lamont EB. Utility of administrative claims data for the study of brain metastases: a validation study. J Neurooncol. 2009;95(3):427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leizorovicz A. Epidemiology of postoperative venous thromboembolism in Asian patients. Results of the SMART venography study. Haematologica. 2007;92(9):1194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. AHRQ. National Healthcare Disparities Report: US Department of Health and Human Services; July 2005.

  45. Liu JH, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, et al. Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA. 2006;296(16):1973–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mukherjee D, Zaidi HA, Kosztowski T, et al. Predictors of access to pituitary tumor resection in the United States, 1988–2005. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(2):259–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mehta M, Noyes W, Craig B, et al. A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of radiosurgery vs. resection for single-brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;39(2):445–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Woodworth GF, Baird CJ, Garces-Ambrossi G, Tonascia J, Tamargo RJ. Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(2):251–6; discussion 256–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by grants from American Physicians Fellowship (APF) (Grossman), Johns Hopkins Center for Innovative Medicine (Mukherjee), and the Department of Neurosurgery (Brem, Quiñones-Hinojosa), and Surgery (Chang) at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa MD.

Additional information

R. Grossman and D. Mukherjee are contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grossman, R., Mukherjee, D., Chang, D.C. et al. Predictors of Inpatient Death and Complications among Postoperative Elderly Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 521–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1299-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1299-2

Keywords

Navigation