Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Prognostic Value of Tumor Mitotic Rate and Other Clinicopathologic Factors in Patients with Locoregional Recurrences of Melanoma

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tumor mitotic rate (MRP) is an independent prognostic factor in clinically localized primary cutaneous melanoma, but the prognostic importance of mitotic rate in melanoma recurrences (MRR) is not known. In this study, we sought to determine the prognostic value of MRR and other clinicopathologic factors in recurrent melanoma.

Methods

Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma diagnosed between 1979 and 2006, who subsequently developed recurrence(s), were studied. Histologic sections of primary and first locoregional recurrences of melanoma were examined, and MRP and MRR were measured. Relationships between MRR, known prognostic parameters in melanoma, time to first recurrence (TTR), and postrecurrence survival were analyzed.

Results

A total of 279 patients (172 men, 107 women) had AJCC stage I (n = 97) or stage II (n = 182) melanoma. Median MRP and MRR were 4/mm2 (0–34) and 4/mm2 (0–51), respectively. There was weak association between MRP and MRR (R 2 = 0.02, p = 0.02). Independent predictors of poorer postrecurrence survival were shorter TTR (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.61–0.90, p = 0.003) and recurrence type (10-year postrecurrence survival for local, lymph node, and in-transit recurrences: 70%, 21.5%, and 11.1%, respectively; p = 0.04). MRR >0 was associated with poorer 10-year postrecurrence survival (39.1%) than if MRR = 0 (51.2%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.15). However, the difference in survival between patients with MRR >0 and those with MRR = 0 increased with time.

Conclusions

TTR is an independent predictor of postrecurrence survival. Because survival in patients with MRR >0 decreases with time (relative to those with MRR = 0), MRR should be routinely measured so that future studies can determine whether MRR has any independent predictive value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azzola MF, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, et al. Tumor mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of 3661 patients from a single center. Cancer. 2003;97(6):1488–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Francken AB, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, et al. The prognostic importance of tumor mitotic rate confirmed in 1317 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma and long follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(4):426–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogunovic D, O’Neill DW, Belitskaya-Levy I, et al. Immune profile and mitotic index of metastatic melanoma lesions enhance clinical staging in predicting patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(48):20429–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hilsenbeck SG, Allred DC. Improved methods of estimating mitotic activity in solid tumors. Hum Pathol. 1992;23(6):601–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGovern VJ, Cochran AJ, Van der Esch EP, et al. The classification of malignant melanoma, its histological reporting and registration: a revision of the 1972 Sydney classification. Pathology. 1986;18(1):12–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Francken AB, Accortt NA, Shaw HM, et al. Prognosis and determinants of outcome following locoregional or distant recurrence in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1476–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn-Cedermark G, Mansson-Brahme E, Rutqvist LE, et al. Metastatic patterns, clinical outcome, and malignant phenotype in malignant cutaneous melanoma. Acta Oncol. 1999;38(5):549–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soong SJ, Harrison RA, McCarthy WH, et al. Factors affecting survival following local, regional, or distant recurrence from localized melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67(4):228–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reintgen DS, Cox C, Slingluff CL Jr, Seigler HF. Recurrent malignant melanoma: the identification of prognostic factors to predict survival. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28(1):45–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cruse CW, Wells KE, Schroer KR, Reintgen DS. Etiology and prognosis of local recurrence in malignant melanoma of the skin. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28(1):26–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fusi S, Ariyan S, Sternlicht A. Data on first recurrence after treatment for malignant melanoma in a large patient population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91(1):94–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Markowitz JS, Cosimi LA, Carey RW, et al. Prognosis after initial recurrence of cutaneous melanoma. Arch Surg. 1991;126(6):703–7 (discussion 707–8).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meier F, Will S, Ellwanger U, et al. Metastatic pathways and time courses in the orderly progression of cutaneous melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147(1):62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scolyer RA, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of histopathologic prognostic variables in primary cutaneous melanomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(12):1571–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the support of the Cancer Institute New South Wales, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and colleagues at Melanoma Institute Australia and the Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. Dr. Murali and Professor Scolyer are Cancer Institute New South Wales Clinical Research Fellows.

Conflict of interest statement

No commercial interests declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajmohan Murali MBBS.

Additional information

Drs. Murali, Moncrieff and Hong contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murali, R., Moncrieff, M.D., Hong, J. et al. The Prognostic Value of Tumor Mitotic Rate and Other Clinicopathologic Factors in Patients with Locoregional Recurrences of Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 2992–2999 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1078-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1078-0

Keywords

Navigation