Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Stratification for Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Analysis of Lymphatic Spread and Prognostic Factors

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of factors related to outcome is vital for the selection of therapeutic alternatives for patients with early (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma. This study was undertaken to determine predictors of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma following esophagectomy.

Materials and Methods

A prospectively maintained database identified 85 patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Depth of tumor invasion (T stage) was subdivided into mucosal (T1a) or submucosal invasion (T1b). Median follow-up was 59 months.

Results

Thoracoscopically assisted 3-phase esophagectomy was performed in 73 of 85 patients (86%). Lymph node metastases (N stage) were identified in 9 of 85 patients (11%). Depth of tumor invasion (T stage), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and poor differentiation were associated with N stage. The patients could be stratified into 4 risk groups for lymph node metastases: group I—T1a (0 of 35 patients [0%] with positive nodes); group II—T1b, well/moderate differentiation and no LVI (1 of 28 patients [4%] with positive nodes); group III—T1b, poor differentiation and no LVI (2 of 9 patients [22%] with positive nodes); and group IV—T1b any grade with LVI (6 of 13 patients [46%] with positive nodes). Survival analyses found T stage, N stage, LVI, and poor differentiation to be significant prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Risk stratification is possible for patents with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Local resection techniques without lymphadenectomy may be alternatives for T1a tumors. Esophagectomy should remain the standard of care for patients with T1b tumors and those with LVI or poor differentiation considered for neoadjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whiteman DC, Sadeghi S, Pandeya N, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Bain CJ, et al. Combined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus. Gut. 2008;52:173–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pera M, Manterola C, Vidal O, Grande L. Epidemiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:151–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Improved prognosis of resected esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2004;28:520–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group: Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1727–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, Foo K, Zalcberg J, Simes J. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:226–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2000;232:353–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu L, Hofstetter WL, Rashid A, Swisher SG, Correa AM, Ajani JA, et al. Significance of the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis in superficially invasive (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1079–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sampliner RE. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1888–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Falk GW, Ours TM, Richter JE. Practice patterns for surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, Fennerty MB, Sampliner R, Spechler S, et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:310–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wani S, Sharma P. The rationale for screening and surveillance of Barrett’s metaplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:829–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Corley DA, Levin TR, Habel LA, Weiss NS, Buffler PA. Surveillance and survival in Barrett’s adenocarcinomas: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:633–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper GS. Endoscopic screening and surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus: can claims data determine its effectiveness? Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:914–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbour AP, Rizk NP, Gonen M, Tang L, Bains MS, Rusch VW, et al. Lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): impact of adequate staging on outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:306–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rizk N, Venkatraman E, Park B, Flores R, Bains MS, Rusch V. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1374–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1781–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Larghi A, Lightdale CJ, Ross AS, Fedi P, Hart J, Rotterdam H, et al. Long-term follow-up of complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection (CBE-EMR) for the treatment of high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2007;39:1086–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasad GA, Wang KK, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Krishnadath KK, Nichols FC, III, et al. Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Conio M, Repici A, Cestari R, Blanchi S, Lapertosa G, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: an Italian experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:6650–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ell C, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Guenter E, Behrens A, et al. Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pech O, Gossner L, May A, Rabenstein T, Vieth M, Stolte M, et al. Long-term results of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid for superficial Barrett’s cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pacifico RJ, Wang KK, Wongkeesong LM, Buttar NS, Lutzke LS. Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy versus esophagectomy for management of early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:252–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Corti L, Skarlatos J, Boso C, Cardin F, Kosma L, Koukourakis MI, et al. Outcome of patients receiving photodynamic therapy for early esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:419–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Keeley SB, Pennathur A, Gooding W, Landreneau RJ, Christie NA, Luketich J. Photodynamic therapy with curative intent for Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia and superficial esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2406–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Laethem JL, Jagodzinski R, Peny MO, Cremer M, Deviere J. Argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia and in situ adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy. 2001;33:257–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pech O, Behrens A, May A, Nachbar L, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:1200–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Naehrig J, Sarbia M, Siewert JR. Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2005;242:566–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002:111–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1993;25: 455–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Manner H, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Günter E, et al. Early Barrett’s carcinoma with “low-risk” submucosal invasion: long-term results of endoscopic resection with a curative intent. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2589–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takubo K, Sasajima K, Yamashita K, Tanaka Y, Fujita K. Double muscularis mucosae in Barrett’s esophagus. Hum Pathol. 1991;22:1158–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hahn HP, Shahsafaei A, Odze RD. Vascular and lymphatic properties of the superficial and deep lamina propria in Barrett esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1454–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abraham SC, Krasinskas AM, Correa AM, Hofstetter WL, Ajani JA, Swisher SG, et al. Duplication of the muscularis mucosae in Barrett esophagus: an underrecognized feature and its implication for staging of adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1719–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis JT, Wang KK, Abraham SC. Muscularis mucosae duplication and the musculo-fibrous anomaly in endoscopic mucosal resections for barrett esophagus: implications for staging of adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mandal RV, Forcione DG, Brugge WR, Nishioka NS, Mino-Kenudson M, Lauwers GY. Effect of tumor characteristics and duplication of the muscularis mucosae on the endoscopic staging of superficial Barrett esophagus-related neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:620–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Miller R, Siegmund D. Maximally selected chi-square statistics. Biometrics. 1982;38:1011–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Westerterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ, Tilanus HW, ten Kate FJ, Bergman JJ, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:497–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Altorki NK, Lee PC, Liss Y, Meherally D, Korst RJ, Christos P, et al. Multifocal neoplasia and nodal metastases in T1 esophageal carcinoma: implications for endoscopic treatment. Ann Surg. 2008;247:434–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J, Werner M, Siewert JR. Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg. 2000;232:733–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gockel I, Domeyer M, Sgourakis GG, Schimanski CC, Moehler M, Kirkpatrick CJ, et al. Prediction model of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer including D2-40 immunostaining. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:191–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ancona E, Rampado S, Cassaro M, Battaglia G, Ruol A, Castoro C, et al. Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3278–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wijnhoven BP, Tran KT, Esterman A, Watson DI, Tilanus HW. An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2007;245:717–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bollschweiler E, Baldus SE, Schroder W, Prenzel K, Gutschow C, Schneider PM, et al. High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Endoscopy. 2006;38:149–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rice TW, Zuccaro G, Jr., Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH, Goldblum JR. Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:787–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Buskens CJ, Westerterp M, Lagarde SM, Bergman JJ, ten Kate FJ, van Lanschot JJ. Prediction of appropriateness of local endoscopic treatment for high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma by EUS and histopathologic features. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:703–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tajima Y, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A, Tachimori Y, Kato H, Watanabe H, et al. Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 240 surgically resected tumors. Cancer. 2000;88:1285–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Li C, Kim S, Lai JF, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi WH, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:764–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Roggin KK, Yeh JJ, Ferrone CR, Riedel E, Gerdes H, Klimstra DS, et al. Limitations of ampullectomy in the treatment of nonfamilial ampullary neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:971–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cen P, Hofstetter WL, Correa AM, Wu TT, Lee JH, Ross WA, et al. Lymphovascular invasion as a tool to further subclassify T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2008;112:1020–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pennathur A, Farkas A, Krasinskas AM, Ferson PF, Gooding WE, Gibson MK, et al. Esophagectomy for T1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1048–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Foroulis CN, Thorpe JA. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia or early cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:30–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ishihara R, Iishi H, Takeuchi Y, Kato M, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:799–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ciocirlan M, Lapalus MG, Hervieu V, Souquet JC, Napoleon B, Scoazec JY, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for squamous premalignant and early malignant lesions of the esophagus. Endoscopy. 2007;39:24–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Fritz A, Gunter E, Mayer G, et al. Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:1085–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lopes CV, Hela M, Pesenti C, Bories E, Caillol F, Monges G, et al. Circumferential endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:820–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. van Hillegersberg R, Haringsma J, ten Kate FJ, Tytgat GN, van Lanschot JJ. Invasive carcinoma after endoscopic ablative therapy for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Dig Surg. 2003;20:440–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Portale G, Peters JH, Hsieh CC, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR. Can clinical and endoscopic findings accurately predict early-stage adenocarcinoma? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:294–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Shimoyama S, Imamura K, Takeshita Y, Tatsutomi Y, Yoshikawa A, Fujishiro M, et al. The useful combination of a higher frequency miniprobe and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of T1 esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:434–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Barbour PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbour, A.P., Jones, M., Brown, I. et al. Risk Stratification for Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Analysis of Lymphatic Spread and Prognostic Factors. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 2494–2502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1025-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1025-0

Keywords

Navigation