Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

No Influence of Surgical Volume on Patients’ Health-Related Quality of Life After Esophageal Cancer Resection

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies on factors that can counteract the negative impact of esophagectomy on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQL) have been sparse. This study was undertaken to examine the question whether hospital or surgeon volume influences HRQL as evaluated 6 months after such surgery.

Materials and Methods

A Swedish prospective, population-based cohort study of esophageal cancer patients treated surgically in 2001–2005 was conducted. All patients completed validated HRQL questionnaires, developed by EORTC, addressing general HRQL (QLQ-C30) and esophageal-specific symptoms (QLQ-OES18), 6 months postoperatively. Mean scores with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Clinically relevant mean score differences (≥10) between groups were further analyzed in a linear regression model, adjusted for several potential confounders.

Results

Some 355 patients were included (80% of eligible). No clinically relevant differences were found between low-volume (0–9 operations/year) and high-volume hospitals (>9 operations/year) or between low-volume (0–6 operations/year) and high-volume surgeons (>6 operations/year). Stratified analyses for tumor location did not reveal any differences between hospital or surgeon volume groups. Moreover, no material differences were found between the four individual high-volume hospitals.

Conclusion

This study revealed no HRQL advantages of being treated at high-volume hospitals or by high-volume surgeons, as measured 6 months after esophageal cancer resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2117–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998; 280:1747–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rouvelas I, Jia C, Viklund P, et al. Surgeon volume and postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33:162–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, et al. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 245:777–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Zeng W, et al. Impact of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 2007;142:113–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillison EW, Powell J, McConkey CC, et al. Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg 2002; 89:344–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Viklund P, Wengstrom Y, Rouvelas I, et al. Quality of life and persisting symptoms after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42:1407–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lagergren P, Avery KN, Hughes R, et al. Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer 2007; 110:686–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg 2006; 243:204–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:825–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:365–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39:1384–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, et al. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. 3rd ed. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:139–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 1996; 5:555–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothman K. Modern epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 1998

  17. Dresner SM, Griffin SM. Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1426–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rouvelas I, Zeng W, Lindblad M, et al. Survival after surgery for oesophageal cancer: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:864–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lagergren J. Influence of surgery-related factors on quality of life after esophageal or cardia cancer resection. World J Surg 2005; 29:841–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, et al. Satisfaction with care: an independent outcome measure in surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:817–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rutegard M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I, et al. Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection. Br J Surg 2008; 95:592–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bianco FJ Jr., Riedel ER, Begg CB, et al. Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol 2005; 173:2099–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hermanek P. Impact of surgeon’s technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:559–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Swedish Cancer Society. We are also grateful to Eja Fridsta for invaluable help with the fieldwork of the Swedish Esophageal and Cardia Cancer (SECC) register. We sincerely appreciate the collaboration of all contact doctors participating in the SECC register, namely Erik Aasberg, Gunnar Adell, Stig-Olof Almgren, Christer Andersson, Bengt Anesten, Ebbe Ankeraa, Lena Appelgren, John Blomberg, Bernt Boeryd, Poul Boiesen, Mogens Bove, Mats Broberg, Pawel Burian, Björn Bäckstrand, Tora Campbell-Chiru, Ulf Carlsson, Åke Dahlqvist, Jan Dalenbäck, Stefan Dedorson, Jan Dolata, Thomas Edekling, Kent Edin, Tom Ekstrand, Annika Elmhorn Rosenborg, Lars-Krister Enander, Mats Eriksson, Thomas Eriksson, Bo Erlandsson, Ivan Farago, Elisabeth Flashar Lindahl, Petra Flygare, Ulla Friberg, Signe Friesland, Ashok Gadré, Ulf Gerdes, Per Gullstrand, Olle Gunder, Gustav Gustavsson, Mehmet Gözen, Andrea Halasz, Marianne Hall Angerås, Ann Hammarlund, Jörgen Hansen, Poul Erik Hansen, Mats Hedberg, Lennart Hedenborg, Antti Heikkilä, Per Herlin, Leif Hoffmann-Laursen, Erik Holm, Fredrik Holmner, Hans-Olof Håkansson, Hans Högström, Leif Ingvarsson, Peter Jilcke, Bengt Johansson, Karl-Erik Johansson, Leif Johansson, Sven Johansson, Erik Johnsson, Göran Karlsson, Mats Karlsson, Staffan Kinman, Gerhard Kjellén, Wieslava Kranze, Hans Krook, Richard Kuylenstierna, Anders Kylebäck, Peter Lannes, Sven Larsson, Gustav Levin, Pontus Lidberg, Bengt Liedman, Håkan Liljeholm, Ramon Lillo-Gil, Daniel Lindahl, Gert Lindell, Christer Lindholm, Johan Lindholm, Christina Lindström, Gunilla Ljung, Anders Lundberg, Kjell Lundberg, Lars Lundell, Britta Lödén, Ulf Lönn, Ester Lörinc, Shabaz Majid, Janusz Matusik, Kai Melén, Lennart Mellblom, Hans Modig, Eva Munck-Wikland, Torbjörn Myrnäs, Ewa Mårtensson, Torben Navne, Anders Nihlberg, Erik Nilsson, Mats Nilsson, Roland Nilsson, Torgny Nordén, Tomas Norlander, Johan Nyman, Ingmar Näslund, Bengt Ohlander, Bo Ojen, Sante Olling, Bengt Olsson, Håkan Olsson, Mikael Olsson, Rickard Palmkvist, Fredrik Petersson, Johan Ramström, Gunnar Rimbäck, Pehr Rissler, Staffan Rosendahl, Claes Rudberg, Valter Ryd, Thure Rådmark, Björn Sandmark, Charles Silseth, Svante Sjöstedt, Stefan Spinnell, Roger Stenling, Dag Stockeld, Edith Stöckel, Magnus Sundblad, Erik Svartholm, Conny Svensson, Jan-Olov Svensson, Robert Szepesvari, Claes Söderlund, Claes Theander, Stefan Thelin, Maria Thorén Örnberg, Tibor Tot, Torbjörn Tuveson, Maciej Tytor, Sören Vallgren, Svend Vang Petersen, Anders Victorin, Torkel Wahlin, Kjell Wallin, Bruno Walther, Olle Wihlborg, Bo J Wilhelmsson, Åke Östh, and Görel Östberg.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Rutegård.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rutegård, M., Lagergren, P. No Influence of Surgical Volume on Patients’ Health-Related Quality of Life After Esophageal Cancer Resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 2380–2387 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9964-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9964-4

Keywords

Navigation