Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Hospital Volume on Surgical Outcome for Head and Neck Cancer

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to define the prognostic significance of surgical center case volume on outcome for head and neck cancer (HNC). Florida cancer registry and inpatient hospital data were queried for HNC diagnosed from 1998 to 2002. Of the 11,160 operative cases of HNC identified, 35.3% were treated at low-volume centers (LVCs), 32.7% in intermediate-volume centers (IVC), and 32.1% at high-volume centers (HVC). A larger proportion of high-grade tumors (27.9%) and lesions over 30 mm (39.7%) were resected at HVC (p < 0.001). Median survival was 61 months for HVC, 52 months for IVC, and 47 months for LVC (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated significantly improved survival at HVC for low-, medium-, and high-grade tumors, small tumors (<30 mm), and for cancers of the parotid, larynx, and pharynx. On multivariate analysis, corrected for patient comorbidities, treatment at a HVC was a significant independent predictor of improved survival (HR = 1.25, p = 0.001). We conclude that HNC patients treated at HVC have significantly better long-term survival and cure rates. Where possible, patients with large (>30 mm), high-grade or parotid, larynx, and pharynx tumors should be evaluated and offered care at a high-volume center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris RL. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1695–709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2008.

  3. Luft HS. The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models. Med Care. 1980;18(9):940–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutierrez JC, Perez EA, Moffat FL, et al. Should soft tissue sarcomas be treated at high-volume centers? An analysis of 4205 patients. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):952–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khuri SF, Najjar SF, Daley J, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):370–82; discussion 382–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knipp BS, Deeb GM, Prager RL, et al. A contemporary analysis of outcomes for operative repair of type A aortic dissection in the United States. Surgery. 2007;142(4):524–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, et al. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):777–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, et al. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery. 2002;131(1):6–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, et al. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(3):401–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, et al. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2002;236(5):583–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, et al. Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection. J Surg Oncol. 2003; 83(2):68–78; discussion 78–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodgson N, Koniaris LG, Livingstone AS, Franceschi D. Gastric carcinoids: a temporal increase with proton pump introduction. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1610–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perez EA, Koniaris LG, Snell SE, et al. 7201 carcinoids: increasing incidence overall and disproportionate mortality in the elderly. World J Surg. 2007;31(5):1022–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perez EA, Livingstone AS, Franceschi D, et al. Current incidence and outcomes of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors including gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(4):623–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez EA, Gutierrez JC, Jin X, et al. Surgical outcomes of gastrointestinal sarcoma including gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a population-based examination. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(1):114–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Molina M, Cheung M, Perez E, et al. African American and poor patients have a dramatically worse prognosis for head and neck cancer: an examination of 20,915 patients. Cancer. 6 Oct 2008 [Epub ahead of print].

  20. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(6):511–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Henschke UK, Leffall LD Jr, Mason CH, et al. Alarming increase of the cancer mortality in the U.S. black population (1950–1967). Cancer. 1973;31(4):763–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu KC, Miller BA, Springfield SA. Measures of racial/ethnic health disparities in cancer mortality rates and the influence of socioeconomic status. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(10):1092–100, 1102–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zell JA, Cinar P, Mobasher M, et al. Survival for patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma among ethnic groups: the effects of socioeconomic status and treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(1):66–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carey P, Gjerdingen DK. Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races. J Fam Pract. 1993;37(6):583–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang SW, Kerlikowske K, Napoles-Springer A, et al. Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography. Cancer. 1996;78(7):1395–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, et al. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA. 1994;272(12):947–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hegarty V, Burchett BM, Gold DT, Cohen HJ. Racial differences in use of cancer prevention services among older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(7):735–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu WL, Kasl S, Flannery JT, et al. The accuracy of prostate cancer staging in a population-based tumor registry and its impact on the black–white stage difference (Connecticut, United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1995;6(5):425–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Boohaker EA, et al. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12(4):282–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Optenberg SA, Thompson IM, Friedrichs P, et al. Race, treatment, and long-term survival from prostate cancer in an equal-access medical care delivery system. JAMA. 1995;274(20):1599–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Suarez L, Pulley L. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;18:41–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sung HY, Kearney KA, Miller M, et al. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan. Cancer. 2000;88(10):2283–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Baker DW, Sudano JJ, Albert JM, et al. Lack of health insurance and decline in overall health in late middle age. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(15):1106–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McWilliams JM, Zaslavsky AM, Meara E, Ayanian JZ. Health insurance coverage and mortality among the near-elderly. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(4):223–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schroen AT, Cress RD. Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2001;234(5):641–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen CS, Liu TC, Lin HC, Lien YC. Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(2):349–56.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lin CC, Lin HC. Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Surgery. 2008;143(3):343–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McKay A, You I, Bigam D, et al. Impact of surgeon training on outcomes after resective hepatic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008.

  39. Wen HC, Tang CH, Lin HC, et al. Association between surgeon and hospital volume in coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):835–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Xirasagar S, Lien YC, Lin HC, et al. Procedure volume of gastric cancer resections versus 5-year survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(1):23–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported in part by the State of Florida James and Ester King Tobacco Research Grant and the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonidas G. Koniaris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, M.C., Koniaris, L.G., Perez, E.A. et al. Impact of Hospital Volume on Surgical Outcome for Head and Neck Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 1001–1009 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0191-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0191-9

Keywords

Navigation