Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primary Vaginal Reconstruction at the Time of Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Cancer: Morbidity Revisited

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze our experience about the benefits and morbidity of primary vaginal reconstruction in pelvic exenteration. Over a 10-year period, 64 patients underwent a pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer, except for ovarian and fallopian cancer. Twenty-nine patients underwent pelvic exenteration with vaginal reconstruction [21 cases with transverse rectus-abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and eight cases with Singapore fascio-cutaneous flap]. Thirty-five patients did not undergo vaginal reconstruction. Postoperative morbidity was recorded and a comparative analysis of morbidity between groups was made. Pelvic abscess and small bowel fistula occurred more frequently in the no neovagina group (20% versus 6.9% and 20% versus 3.4%, respectively). There were no differences between groups regarding fever, colorectal anastomosis (CRA) dehiscence–leakage, prolonged ileus, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or wound complications. Surgery time was significantly longer for the neovagina group. There was only one perioperative death, which occurred in the neovagina group. Vaginal stenosis, necrosis, and shortness occurred less frequently for TRAM flap compared with Singapore flap (19.0% versus 28.6%, 14.5% versus 50% and 0% versus 100%, respectively). CRA dehiscence–leakage appeared more frequently (83.3% versus 28.6%) in the Singapore group. Nevertheless, this complication was statistically associated (p = 0.0009) with low CRA (<5 cm). TRAM flap seems to be the preferable option for reconstructing the vagina after pelvic exenteration. The Singapore fascio-cutaneous flap carries a higher rate of complications, does not work as functional neovagina after pelvic exenteration, and does not seem to be a good choice in cases of low colorectal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlson JW, Soisson AP, Fowler JM, Carter JR, Twiggs LB, Carson LF. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for primary vaginal reconstruction. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:323–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland LJ, Hancock KC, Gershenson DM, Stringer CA, Atkinson EN, Edwards CL. Gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction concurrent with total pelvic exenteration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:1095–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith HO, Genesen MC, Runowicz CD, Goldberg GL. The rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Modifications, complications and sexual function. Cancer. 1998; 83:510 –20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller B, Morris M, Gershenson DM, Levenback ChL, Burke TW. Intestinal fistulae formation following pelvic exenteration: A review of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience, 1957–1990. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jurado M, Bazán A, Elejabeitia J, Paloma V, Martínez-Monge R, Alcázar JL. Primary vaginal and pelvic floor reconstruction at the time of pelvic exenteration: a study of morbidity. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:293–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soper JT, Havrilesky LJ, Secord AA, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for neovaginal reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:542–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center experience (1987 to 2003). Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:261–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival, morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martínez-Monge R, Jurado M, Aristu JJ, et al. Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy during radical surgery for locally advanced and recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:538–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martínez-Monge R, Jurado M, Cambeiro M, Valero J, Villafranca E, Alcázar JL. Perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced and recurrent gynecologic cancer: initial results of a phase II trial. Brachytherapy. 2006;5:203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor GI, Corlet RJ, Boyd JB. The versatile deep inferior epigastric (inferior rectus abdominis) flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:330–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tobin GR, Day TG. Vaginal and pelvic reconstruction with distally based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:62–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McGraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE. Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1076;58:176–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wee JTK, Joseph VT. A new technique of vaginal reconstruction using neurovascular pudendal thigh flaps: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:701–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woods JE, Alter G, Meland B, Podratz K. Experience with vaginal reconstruction utilizing the modified Singapore flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:270–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruiz-de-Erenchun R, Murillo J, Bazán A, Jurado M, García-Tutor E. Vaginal reconstruction using a modified rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in pelvic cancer surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:455–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saltzman AK, Carter JR, Contreras DN, Hartenbach EM, Fowler JM, Carson LF, et al. Total pelvic exenteration: the relationship between management of the pelvic floor and postoperative complications. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62:420.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Magrina JF, Masterson BJ. Vaginal reconstruction in gynecologic oncology: a review of techniques. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981;36:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pursell SH, Day TG, Tobin TG. Distally based rectus abdominis flap for reconstruction in radical gynecologic procedures. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;37:234–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Soper JT, Rodriguez G, Berchnuck A, Clark-Pearson DL. Long and short gracilis myocutaneous flaps for vulvovaginal reconstruction after radical surgery: comparison of flap-specific complications. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Surgery on the urinary tract. In: Morrow CP, Curtin JP, editors. Gynecologic cancer surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 269–322.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soper JT, Secord AA, Havrilesky LJ, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparison of gracilis and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap neovaginal reconstruction performed during radical pelvic surgery: flap-specific morbidity. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:298–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirhashemi R, Averette HE, Estape R, et al. Low colorectal anastomosis after radical pelvic surgery: a risk factor analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Risk factors for, and management of anastomotic leakage in rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis . 2001;3:135–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alberts JC, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ. Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:478–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Reconstructive surgery. In: Morrow CP, Curtin JP, editors. Gynecologic cancer surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 323–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ. A classification system and reconstructive algorithm for acquired vaginal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:1058–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Casey WJ 3rd, Tran NV, Petty PM, Stulak JM, Woods JE. A comparison of 99 consecutive vaginal reconstructions: an outcome study. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:27–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ratliff CR, Gershenson DM, Morris M, et al. Sexual adjustment of patients undergoing gracilis myocutaneous flap vaginal reconstruction in conjunction with pelvic exenteration. Cancer. 1996;78:2229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matías Jurado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurado, M., Bazán, A., Alcázar, J.L. et al. Primary Vaginal Reconstruction at the Time of Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Cancer: Morbidity Revisited. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 121–127 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0171-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0171-0

Keywords

Navigation