Skip to main content

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Phenotype: Does Dose Matter?

Abstract

Background

Duration and type of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has been associated with increased breast cancer risk and the development of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors. The effect of HT dose on breast cancer tumor characteristics remains undefined. We sought to determine if HT dosing regimens influence breast cancer phenotype.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of incident female breast cancers occurring in the year 2003 listed in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Cancer Registry. Type of HT, dose, number of tablets dispensed, tumor phenotype, stage, grade, and histology were obtained from electronic records for women aged ≥50 years who had more than 1 year of uninterrupted pharmacy data (= 1701). A dose index of HT exposure was created and odds ratios were used to determine if tumor phenotype varied between exposure groups. These results were compared with a previously published analysis of HT duration on tumor phenotype conducted with the same dataset.

Results

The cumulative effect of estrogen and progesterone hormone therapy as calculated by factoring both dose and duration of HT use prior to breast cancer diagnosis did not reveal any new associations that were not previously identified by analysis of HT duration of exposure alone. Low-dose-index combination-HT users were less likely to have tumors with an ER-positive phenotype. An overall trend developed in which low- and high-dose-index exposed women had the lowest rates of ER- and progesterone receptor (PR) -positive tumors.

Conclusion

Duration of use is an adequate surrogate for determining overall exposure to HT when considering the effect of HT on breast cancer phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Berry DA, Ravdin PM. Breast cancer trends: a marriage between clinical trial evidence, epidemiology. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1139–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, et al. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1670–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288:321–33.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brewster AM, Do KA, Thompson PA, et al. Relationship between epidemiologic risk factors and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4438–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 1997; 350:1047–59

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cobleigh MA, Norlock FE, Oleske DM, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and high S phase in breast cancer. JAMA 1997; 281:1528–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang ES, Chew T, Shiboski S, et al. Risk factors for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Arch Surg 2005; 140:58–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen WY, Hankinson SE, Schnitt SJ, et al. Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 101:1490–500.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li CI, Malone KE, Porter PL, et al. Relationship between long durations and different regimens of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2003; 289:3254–63.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD, et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA 2003; 289:3243–53.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, et al. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:606–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reeves GK, Beral V, Green J, et al. Hormonal therapy for menopause and breast-cancer risk by histological type: a cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:910–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar AS, Cureton E, Shim V, et al. Type and duration of exogenous hormone use affects breast cancer histology. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:695–703.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hersh AL, Stefanick ML, Stafford RS. National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence. JAMA 2004;291:47–53.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinzone JJ, Stevenson H, Strobl JS, et al. Molecular and cellular determinants of estrogen receptor alpha expression. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:4605–12.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth R. Garwood BS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garwood, E.R., Kumar, A.S. & Shim, V. Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Phenotype: Does Dose Matter?. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 2526–2532 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0019-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0019-7

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Hormone replacement therapy
  • Hormone therapy
  • Estrogen receptor
  • Histology
  • Menopause