Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lumboaortic and Iliac Lymphadenectomy for Lymph Node Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic Value of the MSI Phenotype

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Some patients have isolated lumboaortic and/or iliac lymph node recurrences (ILNR) of colorectal cancer. Current guidelines recommend the use of chemotherapy. The aim of our study was to assess the carcinological results of lymphadenectomy for ILNR and to identify prognostic factors that may be used to select patients for this aggressive surgical approach.

Methods

Medical notes, pathological findings, and surgical procedure of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for ILNR of colorectal cancer between 1998 and 2005 were reviewed.

Results

Ten patients (four women) underwent lymphadenectomy for ILNR. Lymphadenectomy was performed after a mean of 37 ± 16.6 months after colon or rectal resection. Two patients developed a postoperative complication. Mean number of lymph nodes removed was 5.7 ± 3.3. After a median follow-up of 30.7 months, four patients were alive, including two patients without recurrence at 95 and 96 months after colectomy and two with local and distant recurrences at 114 and 70 months. Among the three patients with microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumors, two were free of disease at 61 and 81 months, respectively, and one died of recurrent disease 20 months after lymphadenectomy.

Conclusion

Lymphadenectomy for ILNR of colorectal cancer is a feasible therapeutic option for selected patients. These preliminary results suggest that resection should be proposed for MSI patients because cure is possible, but to be confirmed, the findings require larger studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasdemir O, Cöl C, Yalcin E et al. Local recurrence and survival rates after extended systematic lymph-node dissetion for surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52:455–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leggeri A, Roseano M, Balani A et al. Lumboaortic and iliac lymphadenectomy: what is the role today? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:S54–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bismuth H, Adam R, Levi F et al. Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 1996;224:509–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam R, Miller R, Pitombo M et al. Two-stage hepatectomy approach for initially unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2007;16:525–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Welter S, Jacobs J, Krbek T et al. Long-term survival after repeated resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishimura G, Funaki H, Michiwa Y et al. [A case of a combined aortectomy with dissection of recurrent paraaortic lymph nodes of sigmoid colon cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2000;27:2001–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashimoto M, Komatsu H, Naruse Y et al. Resection of paraaortic lymph node metastasis of colon cancer with graft replacement. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:709–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Halling KC, French AJ, McDonnell SK et al. Microsatellite instability and 8p allelic imbalance in stage B2 and C colorectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1295–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh E et al. Tumour microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;342:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Watanabe T, Wu TT, Catalano PJ et al. Molecular Predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1196–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hemminki A, Mecklin J-P, Järvinen H et al. Microsatellite instability is a favorable prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. Gastroenterology 2000;119:921–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Grieu F et al. Association of tumour site and sex with survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Lancet 2000;355:1745–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright CM, Dent OF, Barker M et al. Prognostic significance of extensive microsatellite instability in sporadic clinicopathological stage C colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2002;87:1197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parc Y, Gueroult S, Mourra N et al. Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability determined by immunohistochemical staining of MSH2 and MLH1 in sporadic T3N0M0 colon cancer. Gut 2004;53:371–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ribic CM, Sargent DJ, Moore MJ et al. Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:247–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cawkwell L, Gray S, Murgatroyd H et al. Choice of management strategy for colorectal cancer based on a diagnostic immunohistochemical test for defective mismatch repair. Gut 1999;45:409–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lanza G, Gafa R, Maestri I et al. Immunohistochemical pattern of MLH1/MSH2 expression is related to clinical and pathological features in colorectal adenocarcinomas with microsatellite instability. Mod Pathol 2002;15:741–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stone JG, Robertson D, Houlston RS. Immunohistochemistry for MSH2 and MHL1: a method for identifying mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:484–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcus VA, Madlensky L, Gryfe R et al. Immunohistochemistry for hMLH1 and hMSH2: a practical test for DNA mismatch repair-deficient tumours. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:1248–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cunningham JM, Kim C-Y, Christensen ER et al. The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:780–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rigau V, Sebbagh N, Olschwang S et al. Microsatellite instablity in colorectal carcinoma: the comparison of immunohistochemistry and molecular biology suggests the interest of hMSH6 immunostaining. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:694–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ewald J, Rodrigue CM, Mourra N et al. Immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair proteins, and its relevance in the diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94:1020–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremie H. Lefevre MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lefevre, J.H., Rondelli, F., Mourra, N. et al. Lumboaortic and Iliac Lymphadenectomy for Lymph Node Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic Value of the MSI Phenotype. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 2433–2438 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0007-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0007-y

Keywords

Navigation