Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Worse Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Unlike other human tumors, gastric cancer remains a great therapeutic challenge since no standardized postoperative treatment exists. Knowledge of molecular pathways determining the behavior of individual gastric tumors seems to be crucial for therapeutic decisions, and evaluation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression might be critical for prognosis, assessment, and identification of patients that could be treated with tailored therapies.

Methods

VEGF and EGFR determination was performed in 88 gastric cancer samples as well as 25 normal gastric mucosa specimens from non-cancer patients using a commercially available immunohistochemistry kit. In all samples, the correlation of VEGF and EGFR expression was investigated with each other, and with other prognostic indicators in all samples, and, finally, with survival rates in 69 patients undergoing potentially curative surgery.

Results

Forty-eight per cent (42 cases) of gastric cancers expressed VEGF, and 44% (39 cases) stained for EGFR. In curatively treated patients, VEGF and EGFR expression was demonstrated to correlate with worse survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Molecular profiling was shown to more accurately estimate the risk of cancer-related death than TNM stage, and, of most interest, to allow sorting out high-risk patients within the same stage.

Conclusions

These findings provide evidence that contemporary evaluation of VEGF and EGFR expression may be crucial to select gastric cancer patients with poor prognosis who may benefit of tailored treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56:106–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roukos DH, Kappas AM. Perspectives in the treatment of gastric cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2005; 2:98–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ. Status of extended lymph node dissection: locoregional control is the only way to survive gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2005; 90:153–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Novotny AR, Schuhmacher C, Bush R, Kattan MW, Brennan MF, Siewert JR. Predicting individual survival after gastric cancer resection: validation of a US-derived nomogram at a single high-volume center in Europe. Ann Surg 2006; 243:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ajani JA, Mansfield PF, Crane CH, et al. Paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy in localized gastric carcinoma: degree of pathologic response and not clinical parameters dictated patient outcome. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1237–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allal AS, Zwahlen D, Brundler MA, de Peyer R, Morel P, Huber O, Roth AD. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: long-term results of a phase I trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63:1286–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim S, Lim DH, Lee J, et al. An observational study suggesting clinical benefit for adjuvant postoperative chemoradiation in a population of over 500 cases after gastric resection with D2 nodal dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63:1279–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MacDonald JS. Gastric cancer – new therapeutic options. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:76–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:11–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized duthc gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2069–2077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hundahl SA, Wanebo HJ. Changing gastric cancer treatment in the United States and the pursuit of quality. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:605–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:2903–2909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chong G, Cunningham D. Gastrointestinal cancer: recent developments in medical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:453–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutter AP, Zeitz M, Scherübl H. Recent results in understanding molecular patways in the medical treatment of esophageal and gastric cancer. Onkologie 2004; 27:17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jüttner S, Wißmann C, Jöns T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-D and ist receptor VEGF-3: two novel independent prognostic markers in gastric adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:228–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang TB, Deng MH, Qiu WS, Dong WG. Association of serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C and lymphatic vessel density with lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13:1794–1798

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baselga J, Arteaga CL. Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2445–2459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tzanakis N, Gazouli M, Rallis G, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms in gastric cancer development, prognosis, and survival. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:624–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding S, Li C, Lin S, et al. Distinct roles of VEGF-A and VEGF-C in tumour metastasis of gastric carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2007; 17:369–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Saito H, Osaki T, Murakami D, et al. Prediction of sites of recurrence in gastric carcinoma using immunohistochemical parameters. J Surg Oncol 2007; 95:123–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kondo K, Kaneko T, Baba M, Konno H. VEGF-C and VEGF-A synergistically enhance lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer. Biol Pharm Bull 2007; 30:633–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Galizia G, Lieto E, Orditura M, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression is associated with a worse prognosis in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. World J Surg 2007; 31:1458–1468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boku N, Ohtsu A, Yoshida S, et al. Significance of biological markers for predicting prognosis and selecting chemotherapy regimens of advanced gastric cancer patients between continuous infusion of 5-FU and a combination of 5-FU and cisplatin. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007; 37:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fondevila C, Metges JP, Fuster JJ, et al. p53 and VEGF expression are independent predictors of tumour recurrence and survival following curative resection of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 90:206–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lang SA, Klein D, Moser C, et al. Inhibition of heat shock protein 90 impairs epidermal growth factor-mediated signaling in gastric cancer cells and reduces tumor growth and vascularization in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6:1123–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ito R, Nakayama H, Yoshida K, Matsumura S, Oda N, Yasui W. Expression of Cbl linking with the epidermal growth factor receptor system is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis of human gastric carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2004; 444:324–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:2787–2799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Romano M, Ricci V, Zarrilli R. Mechanisms of disease: Helicobacter pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis–implications for chemoprevention. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 3:622–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grogg KL, Lohse CM, Pankratz VS, Halling KC, Smyrk TC. Lymphocyte-rich gastric cancer: associations with Epstein-Barr virus, microsatellite instability, histology, and survival. Mod Pathol 2003; 16:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hiyama T, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, et al. Chromosomal and microsatellite instability in sporadic gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19:756–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. AJCC Cancer staging manual. 6th Edition. Ed. Springer-Verlag., pp.99–106, 2002

  32. Galizia G, Lieto E, Ferrarraccio F, et al. Determination of molecular marker expression can predict clinical outcome in colon carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:3490–3499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Galizia G, Lieto E, Ferrarraccio F, et al. Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:823–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chan YH. Biostatistics 203. Survival analysis. Singapore Med J 2004; 45:249–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Briasoulis E, Liakakos T, Dova L, Fatouros M, Tsekeris P, Roukos DH, Kappas AM. Selecting a specific pre- or postoperative adjuvant therapy for individual patients with operable gastric cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006; 6:931–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonavida B. Preface: antibody therapy for cancer. Oncogene 2007; 26:3592–3593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McCarty MF, Wey J, Stoeltzing O, et al. ZD6474, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with additional activity against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, inhibits orthotopic growth and angiogenesis of gastric cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2004; 3:1041–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ciardiello F, Troiani T, Bianco R, et al. Interaction between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways: a rational approach for multi-target anticancer therapy. Ann Oncol 2006; 17(suppl_7):vii109–vii114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Galizia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lieto, E., Ferraraccio, F., Orditura, M. et al. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Worse Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 69–79 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9596-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9596-0

Keywords

Navigation