Skip to main content
Log in

Sentinel lymph node procedure followed by laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with IB2-II cervical cancer

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the contribution of the sentinel node (SN) procedure followed by pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy to determine lymph node status in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Patients and methods

A total of 21 women with locally advanced cervical cancer underwent a first laparoscopic SN procedure and pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCR). Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was performed after CCR when the pelvic and paraaortic nodes were not involved.

Results

SNs were detected by means of lymphoscintigraphy in 10 women (47.6%) and intra-operatively in 14 women (66.6%). Of the latter 14 patients, 9 (64%) had an involved SN and 1 of the remaining 5 had pelvic non-SN metastases. The SN false-negative rate was 10%. At final histology, 13 of the 21 women (62%) had lymph node metastases. The total number of recovered pelvic non-SNs was 262, and 10 nodes in 8 women were involved. The total number of paraaortic non-SNs was 255, and 2 nodes in 2 women were involved.

Conclusion

This study shows the poor correlation between pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy and surgical SN mapping in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. A high proportion of women had SN metastases, underlining the importance of multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining of SNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol 2001; 2(9):533–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abed Z, O’Leary M, Hand K, et al. Cervical screening history in patients with early stage carcinoma of the cervix. Ir Med J 2006; 100(1):140–142

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller AB. Quality assurance in screening strategies. Virus Res 2002; 89(2):295–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2001; 358(9284):781–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin WC, Hung YC, Yeh LS, Kao CH, Yen RF, Shen YY. Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89(1):73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeh LS, Hung YC, Shen YY, Kao CH, Lin CC, Lee CC. Detecting para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis by positron emission tomography of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced cervical cancer with negative magnetic resonance imaging findings. Oncol Rep 2002; 9(6):1289–1292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rose PG, Adler LP, Rodriguez M, Faulhaber PF, Abdul-Karim FW, Miraldi F. Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(1):41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2006; 106(4):914–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997; 350(9077):535–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Michel G, Morice P, Castaigne D, Leblanc M, Rey A, Duvillard P. Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91(3):360–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(15):1144–1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tewfik HH, Buchsbaum HJ, Latourette HB, Lifshitz SG, Tewfik FA. Para-aortic lymph node irradiation in carcinoma of the cervix after exploratory laparotomy and biopsy-proven positive aortic nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982; 8(1):13–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greer BE, Koh WJ, Stelzer KJ, Goff BA, Comsia N, Tran A. Expanded pelvic radiotherapy fields for treatment of local-regionally advanced carcinoma of the cervix: outcome and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174(4):1141–1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malfetano JH, Keys H, Cunningham MJ, Gibbons S, Ambros R. Extended field radiation and cisplatin for stage IIB and IIIB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 67(2):203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morice P, Castaigne D, Pautier P, et al. Interest of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IB and II cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73(1):106–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Houvenaeghel G, Lelievre L, Rigouard AL, et al. Residual pelvic lymph node involvement after concomitant chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 102(1):74–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hacker NF, Wain GV, Nicklin JL. Resection of bulky positive lymph nodes in patients with cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1995; 5(4):250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cosin JA, Fowler JM, Chen MD, Paley PJ, Carson LF, Twiggs LB. Pretreatment surgical staging of patients with cervical carcinoma: the case for lymph node debulking. Cancer 1998; 82(11):2241–2248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barranger E, Grahek D, Cortez A, Talbot JN, Uzan S, Darai E. Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node procedure using a combination of patent blue and radioisotope in women with cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 97(12):3003–3009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yabushita H, Shimazu M, Yamada H, et al. Occult lymph node metastases detected by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry predict recurrence in node-negative endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80(2):139–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Changes in definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156(1):263–264

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barranger E, Coutant C, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E. Sentinel node biopsy is reliable in early-stage cervical cancer but not in locally advanced disease. Ann Oncol 2005; 16(8):1237–1242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lambaudie E, Collinet P, Narducci F, et al. Laparoscopic identification of sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer: prospective study using a combination of patent blue dye injection and technetium radiocolloid injection. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89(1):84–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Plante M, Renaud MC, Tetu B, Harel F, Roy M. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91(3):494–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Altgassen C, Paseka A, Urbanczyk H, et al. Dilution of dye improves parametrial SLN detection in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105(2):329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frumovitz M, Coleman RL, Gayed IW, et al. Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194(4):1186–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dargent D, Lamblin G, Romestaing P, Montbarbon X, Mathevet P, Benchaib M. Effect of radiotherapy on pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer stages IB2-IVA: a retrospective analysis of two comparative series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15(3):468–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kupets R, Thomas GM, Covens A. Is there a role for pelvic lymph node debulking in advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2002; 87(2):163–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Houvenaeghel G, Lelievre L, Gonzague-Casabianca L, et al. Long-term survival after concomitant chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery in advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100(2):338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marnitz S, Kohler C, Roth C, Fuller J, Hinkelbein W, Schneider A. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99(3):536–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lai CH, Huang KG, Hong JH, et al. Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89(1):160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Occelli B, Narducci F, Lanvin D, et al. [Comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: randomized experimental study]. Ann Chir 2000; 125(1):9–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sonoda Y, Leblanc E, Querleu D, et al. Prospective evaluation of surgical staging of advanced cervical cancer via a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91(2):326–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Classe JM, Rauch P, Rodier JF, et al. Surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: morbidity and outcome: results of a multicenter study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer). Gynecol Oncol 2006; 102(3):523–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Radiation therapy with and without extrafascial hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89(3):343–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rouzier R, Morice P, De Crevoisier R, et al. Survival in cervix cancer patients treated with radiotherapy followed by radical surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31(4):424–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80(1):3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alain Toledano and Emmanuel Touboul (Department of radiotherapy) for their contribution to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile Daraï MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavoué, V., Bats, AS., Rouzier, R. et al. Sentinel lymph node procedure followed by laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with IB2-II cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 2654–2661 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9493-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9493-6

Keywords

Navigation